If it turns out the Apple has abandoned Titanium for the Pro phones so quickly back to Aluminium,
What reason do you think they’ll go for?
What reason do you think they’ll go for?
That makes a lot of sense for a handheld device that can be dropped.Weight.
Titanium is about ~66% heavier than aluminum by volume.
Or a unique military nomenclature such as T-7075 Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy"Performance" seems like a nice vague reason to run with.
That and they'll invent a name for it like "spacecraft grade" (instead of boring-old "aircraft grade") and the crowd will go wild.
Although what you say is right, I doubt very much that Apple’s going to use it as a public reason to go back to aluminum. They may focus on the much reduced weight, the better thermals, or outright not mentioning the material change. That last one would be quite “Apple”.Likely a cost saving. Aluminum is also more easy to machine.
^^This.OP presumes two things:
- That one material is "better" than the other, without also including the context of how it is used.
- That consumers will care. They won't.
Given that the Air is rumored to use titanium, that would cause a bit of cognitive dissonance.Mother Nature says aluminum takes less carbon to produce.
Then she will hug Tim with her aluminum wand in hand and magically produce the new iPhone for him to share with the world!
Weight.
Titanium is about ~66% heavier than aluminum by volume.
That makes a lot of sense for a handheld device that can be dropped.
Less weight = less energy dissipated on impact = less damage.