Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Timelessblur said:
I think basicly the iMac in short has shortcoming that are not very forgiveble for a desktop to many people (me being one of them). These short coming are fine for a laptop and hell even higher shortcoming are forgiveble for laptops. Problem is this is the new imac is almost like a wanna be Desktop and a wanna be laptop at the same time. So you get shortcomings of both. You get some advatages of each but still gets it short comings

Good point.

imac G5: the power of a laptop with the portability of a desktop!

-vga4life
 
QCassidy352 said:
see a lot of G5 laptops around at $1300, do you? 🙄

I didn't say it had the price of a laptop.

And I'd take a Radeon 9700 Mobility over a GeForce 5200FX any day.

-vga4life
 
i'd like to see more digital hub stuff:
i'm happy to put in airport and bluetooth by bto.
a built in camera would be nice, but an isight is probably more practical.
graphics is good enough for me.
i'd like to have a tv card (HDTV, digital?) and be able to use it as digital videorecorder (of course as bto, of course it won't be cheap).
i'd like to use it as phone/answering machine/fax.
i'd like to be able to use a second monitor (not a mirror)
i'd like to use the internal monitor for as second monitor for my notebook or PC.

aside of the videostuff everything seems to be possible already now.

so apple go ahead and bring a 23" rev. b next year and i'll shell out the money.

andi
 
andiwm2003 said:
i'd like to use it as phone/answering machine/fax.
i'd like to be able to use a second monitor (not a mirror)

mac can already receive faxes... as well as send any files as a fax image, i believe. the only thing it lacks is the ability to scan a document and fax it. i don't think that's very practical to be incorporated into an iMac since it would add a lot of bulk.

using voice IM or voip, i'd think any computer with a microphone can function as a phone, with an added software, if needed...

display mirror/span is done as a part of product differentiation. so i don't that will change. the best you can hope for is a hack.
 
jxyama said:
mac can already receive faxes... as well as send any files as a fax image, i believe. the only thing it lacks is the ability to scan a document and fax it. i don't think that's very practical to be incorporated into an iMac since it would add a lot of bulk.

using voice IM or voip, i'd think any computer with a microphone can function as a phone, with an added software, if needed...

display mirror/span is done as a part of product differentiation. so i don't that will change. the best you can hope for is a hack.

yes, the mac can send recieve faxes, do voicemail. but what i would like to see is it being more integrated. i imagine an airport express hooked up to the phone line in the basemant and that is it. a call wakes the mac from sleep and i can videochat.

the same with videorecording. an airport express to the tv cable and go.

a remote control (of course bto) for itunes and using the mac as tv would be great.

so i'm looking for a vision for an ultimate home entertainment center/computer. apple is moving towards the digital hub and that's what i want. having everything wireless would make it easy. so i think apple is on the right way. they just have to go it all the way.

and they should give up crippling computers for product differentiation.

my 2 cents, andi
 
Trying to be pragmatic, the items that I feel that are truly missing from the iMac G5:

- Built-in BT and AE

- Bundled BT keyboard and mouse

- Built-in 512mb RAM at the cost they have the current offerings

- A BTO option for 128mb video card

On the first three points, the cost would out weigh the extra sales they would receive. With the thrid point being what everyone else is offering.
 
Chip NoVaMac said:
Trying to be pragmatic, the items that I feel that are truly missing from the iMac G5:

- Built-in BT and AE

- Bundled BT keyboard and mouse

- Built-in 512mb RAM at the cost they have the current offerings

- A BTO option for 128mb video card

On the first three points, the cost would out weigh the extra sales they would receive. With the thrid point being what everyone else is offering.

I don't think standard BT makes sense yet. Too many don't want it. If they did, we'd have a lot more choice in BT peripherals.

Apple offering BT, KB and mouse for $99 is a very sweet deal.
 
While I think it would be awesome to see all of these suggestions added as BTO options. I think the only thing they really screwed up on is the memory. The 1.8 GHz models should come with 512MB standard. Everything else (BT, AE, 128MB VRAM, etc.) should be options, not standard.

My 2¢.
 
rdowns said:
I don't think standard BT makes sense yet. Too many don't want it. If they did, we'd have a lot more choice in BT peripherals.

Apple offering BT, KB and mouse for $99 is a very sweet deal.

I see your point. Yet for the $99 that Apple charges it would have given them them the possibility of a cleaner system, and with the the AE "router" a possibility of just a power cord to the iMac G5.
 
so for the ultimate machine, we have:

23"
built-in:
ae
bt
standard 512 ram
upgrade to 128 vram
bluetooth remote control
fax/telephone capabilities
the capability to use as digital tv recorder
and maybe a 'built-in' isight

at the prices these new imacs are at, i'm very very surprised that they
don't offer an "ultimate" imac


for this config:
• 512MB DDR400 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
• 250GB Serial ATA drive
• AirPort Extreme Card
• Bluetooth Module
• iSight
• Bluetooth Module + Apple Wireless Keyboard & Mouse + Mac OS X - U.S. English
• 20-inch widescreen LCD
• 1.8GHz PowerPC G5
• SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
• NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra w/64MB video memory


Subtotal $2,451.00

isn't this still well below the top of the line g4 imac?



***edit***

update with info from apple-history

"The 17" model, with an 80 GB hard drive, 256 MB of RAM, 64 MB of VRAM, and a CD-RW/DVD-R "SuperDrive" was $1799.


In November 2003, Apple introduced a 20" flat-panel iMac, with specs otherwise identical to the 17" model, for $2,199. All models were discontinued in July 2004."


take off the isight and keyboard/mouse and you have

g5 1.8
extreme
bluetooth
250 gig hd
512 ram


for the same price as

g4 1.25
80 gig hd
256 ram

no extreme, no blue tooth.

quite a difference it seems
 
Never really been a fan of the iMac's. Here you are paying for this pretty good display that will certainly outlast the usefulness of speed and components, and in the end, you are just tossing the display away. When anyone ever asks me what to get between a iMac and Powermac, I almost always recommend a Powermac, especailly if they already have a display.
 
jkaz said:
i like it alot though, and if the vram would be at 128, i would likely bite.

comments?

(64mb of vram is max, right?)

After a search for geforce 5200 on nVidia's site I found this article...

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/geforce_fx_5200_ultra/page2.asp said:
Like previous GeForce architectures, the GeForce FX 5200 family utilizes DDR memory with a 128-bit memory interface. Up to 128MB of memory is supported, although we will see 64MB boards from some manufacturers.

So I think Apple has no excuse for not including 128mb at least as a buy to order!
 
As I've said plenty of times before, Apple should provide OPTIONS OPTIONS OPTIONS!

It wouldn't harm to have a built-to-order iMac with 128 MB VRAM or a RADEON 9800 - many people who needed it would pay the extra cash to upgrade. And buying a G5 Tower is not always the solution - they are still more expensive and do not include a screen and are much more powerful.
 
I'm torn between the iMac and Powermac myself. I love the price and design of the iMac, and am pleased with the speed, however I really want a 23" screen. If Apple made the iMac in a 23" version, I'd be all over that, but they won't because I'm sure it'd eat into PM sales.

I don't think BT should be standard, but I think Aiprort should be...and never should the iSight be standard.

Regardless, 256MB of RAM is a joke, and the video card is almost as laughable.
 
joshua_msu said:
Never really been a fan of the iMac's. Here you are paying for this pretty good display that will certainly outlast the usefulness of speed and components, and in the end, you are just tossing the display away.

Well, I would be selling the machine and recovering a lot of the money, not tossing it away, but in any case:

I think there's something missing to this argument. I only have to tell you what the the back of my desk looks like for you to see what I mean. I have cables going everywhere. Cables to carry power from the wall to power bricks, cables to carry power from power bricks to components, cables to carry keyboard and mouse signals around, cables to carry network signals around, cables to carry cable TV signals around, cables to carry audio around. Cables, cables, everywhere. Then there's the dust that settles in between cables, on the cables, around the connectors on the components, in the components, in the air filters that are supposed to protect the components but instead cause overheating, and so on. And all the computers are sitting on the ground (there's no way I'm putting them next to my ear, on the desk) sucking in all the floor-area dust. It's really disgusting to look at it.

Now, suppose I am ready to be rid of all of that. I would be happy to move my PVR machine (call it a home-brew Tivo) into the closet and watch the recorded shows streamed over the network. I would be happy to toss the Windows PC into a less work-oriented area. No more cables, no more dust inhaler, but no more computer, either.

Then I buy an iMac and put it on my desk. One power cord, no brick, goes into the wall. AE for network. BT keyboard and mouse. It's quiet so I don't mind it being up on my desk, off of the floor and away from the dust.

I think that sounds pretty darn nice.
 
sushi said:
What do you need FW8 for? (In a consumer computer)

Pro model, yes. Well even maybe right now since very few devices support it.

Let's be realistic here. This is a consumer computer model. Not a pro model.

Sushi

Can anyone confirm if we need FW800 for HDTV (1080p), or if FW400 would suffice?
 
jsw said:
I must be missing the offensiveness in the post by jkaz. Also, although his post count is low, he's been posting for about seven months and has been around longer than about a quarter of the membership.

I also missed where jkaz argued that the iMac sucks for gaming.

Threads are free. I've yet to understand why people complain about new ones. It's not like the posts will take up less room if they add to an older thread, and sometimes it's nice to not have to dig through 500 previous posts to catch up on a thread so as to not have someone complain that your post was just like one 200 posts previously.

I agree with the VRAM/GPU complaints. I like that BT and AE are best left as options, although I think Apple should either make BT a user-upgradeable option without requiring an external 3rd party dongle or make it standard. I'd also like to see a DVI or VGA in port to allow the iMac to be used as a monitor for an external system.

And yes, I'm sure 300 other people have mentioned the same things.

Thank You I was thinking the same things.
 
Whoa!

The iMac is perfect in every way. At least for its intended purpose. The option that pushed me to the tower/powerbook is the left off DVI out. But with a 20" version, who can ask for a better iAppliance? My current iMac has kept up well for 3 yrs. Anyone picking up one of these beauties will be well served for at least that long. Now come Dual 3's!!!
 
joshua_msu said:
Never really been a fan of the iMac's. Here you are paying for this pretty good display that will certainly outlast the usefulness of speed and components, and in the end, you are just tossing the display away. When anyone ever asks me what to get between a iMac and Powermac, I almost always recommend a Powermac, especailly if they already have a display.

Yeah, but we a disposable society. So if the system last 3 to 5 years for a persons needs, and the smaller foot print is what they are looking for, the iMac is the answer. There are those that also get caught up into the speed thing. Regardless if that speed will make a difference for their tasks.
 
johnnyjibbs said:
As I've said plenty of times before, Apple should provide OPTIONS OPTIONS OPTIONS!

It wouldn't harm to have a built-to-order iMac with 128 MB VRAM or a RADEON 9800 - many people who needed it would pay the extra cash to upgrade. And buying a G5 Tower is not always the solution - they are still more expensive and do not include a screen and are much more powerful.

Given the Apple BTO program, I can only think that there are tech hurdles to offering 128mb VRAM. Heck, look at the extra amount they charge for 128mb VRAM in the PB 15" vs. the 17". It is a profit center. IMO it is not an issue of not wanting to compete with the PM G5 series, now that they are dual processors.
 
after having read the messages here, i'm starting to think that in my perfect world, airport extreme, bluetooth and even built-in isight

would be a standard feature on all macs just as firewire and usb are.


the potential for all of these products is great but are currently under utilized.

instead of the aforementioned items being the bto options, i see the potential, desire and the rumors taking the apple in the direction
of media center.

remote controls, digital tv recording, internet streaming all from your 30 inch imac.

this is the direction i see coming very soon.


i'm impressed by the design and the processor, but simply having the same old bluetooth and airport and even isight as your only spruce it up options has run its course for me.
 
jkaz said:
after having read the messages here, i'm starting to think that in my perfect world, airport extreme, bluetooth and even built-in isight

would be a standard feature on all macs just as firewire and usb are.


the potential for all of these products is great but are currently under utilized.

instead of the aforementioned items being the bto options, i see the potential, desire and the rumors taking the apple in the direction
of media center.

remote controls, digital tv recording, internet streaming all from your 30 inch imac.

this is the direction i see coming very soon.


i'm impressed by the design and the processor, but simply having the same old bluetooth and airport and even isight as your only spruce it up options has run its course for me.

my word. i totally agree. i wonder how expensive a 30" imac would be though.

andi
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.