I have 2 Sport watches and alternate them. I wear one of them 24/7 pretty much. I have a sleep tracker app so I wear one through the night for that. If the watch I've worn in the day has more than 35% left at bed time I wear it for the night and change in the morning. If not I switch at bedtime.
You need to get off the couch and workout some.Also it is obvious that you are not utilizing your
Watch's features (notifications, Siri, weather, directions, music, music control, .....) to any degree so why not just wear a regular watch?
It should be a badge of honor to end every day with less than 20% left.
Well within the limit of accuracy for the battery meter of any modern electronic device. The test would be to run it to shutdown and see if that was any longer/shorter with each charge method.You know what, I don't actually think it's beneficial to charge the watch EVERY NIGHT, even when the battery is above 50%.
I normally only charge mine if the battery drops to 30% or less and I know it won't last me the next day. However, as a test, I put my watch on the charger last night (the battery showed 60% and it would easily have got me through today, so normally, would not have charged it) and have just taken it off the charger now. As soon as I took the watch off, the battery instantly dropped to 99%. Then, a minute later, it dropped to 98%. I have been wearing my watch less than 20 minutes and the battery is now showing 97%.
In my normal charging cycles (when I charge it when it gets to 30% or less, and I know it won't last the next day), when I remove it from the charger, it stays on 100% for at least an hour, before it drops to 99%.
It seems that if I charge my watch EVERY night no matter what the battery shows, the watch will not hold the initial 100% charge for very long at all, before it drops to 99% or less.
And if I am 100% honest, I experience the exact same results with my iPhone 6 - if charged EVERY night no matter what the battery shows, the initial 100% charge drops VERY quickly, however if I ONLY charge it when it drops to 20% (which I do anyway), the initial 100% charge holds for at least an hour and I can sometimes get through a whole day and the battery will still show around 95%!
I do like the nightstand mode - it's basically a digital alarm clock, but the screen only comes on if the watch detects motion. tap it or even nudge the bedside table and it comes on displaying the time in large green numbers, then the display sleeps after a few seconds.
I agree. It could be an optional setting for those who prefer it as it is now. I doubt the battery charge time would be affected too much. But perhaps there could be an issue with burn-in? I thought those days were over with OLED but perhaps not when it comes to the AW. I doubt that would be the case but it seems odd that "nightstand mode" would not stay on all the time. I have never seen a nightstand clock or alarm clock that only displayed the time when you disturbed it in some way.My request is for the watch to stay on while on the charger without having to tap to see the time.
Minor preference for bedtime and during the day at work.
I doubt the battery charge time would be affected too much. But perhaps there could be an issue with burn-in? I thought those days were over with OLED but perhaps not when it comes to the AW.
Correct, but the iPhone and iPad do not have OLED displays--they are LCDs. Some of Samsung's early OLED phones suffered from burn-in. I was just wondering if the AW might have the same susceptibility..... though I HIGHLY doubt it.I'm accustomed to iPhone and iPads been lit up for long periods and the screen works perfectly. The AW has the same screen function.
I'm accustomed to iPhone and iPads been lit up for long periods and the screen works perfectly. The AW has the same screen function.
No, it doesn't. The AW is AMOLED whereas iPhone/iPad are LCD. Two different technologies.
I always charged my watch at night while sleeping when I only had one. now one charges while I wear the other!
What experience would you have if you wore both at once?
➰