Agreed. They’ll go 12s, then 14. Or, more likely, they’ll use this version to drop numbers completely.
Sounds like an excellent idea. They should collaborate with the gaming companies to make PC style games compatible to Apple TV that will compete heavily with a PS5 and Series X with ease. I can’t image Fortnite on a M1X hitting over 100fps in 4K.Way out on the dream limb here and I'm not a gamer (spelling), how about an M1 variant with somewhat less general CPU cores than the predicted M1X but all the M1X GPU cores and put it in an AppleTV form factor for a gaming console? You could use CPU core binned M1Xs. It would probably run games quite well as well as run TVOS programs.
Apple wants to move consumer purchases for the MacBook Pro and iMac's from an average of 6 years ownership to 3 years. But keeping the price the same. I call BS, Oh look the M2 processor has come out now! time to upgrade like my iPhone. This is perfect with alinement with AppleCare 3 year program. Oh and we are going to devalue your old Mac if you want to trade it in, so we get more money for Apple stock holders.
Why is my Mac running so slow, oh it only has a M1 processor and Apple has upgraded the OS.
Will 2021 be the year internet people update their color pallet out of 30 years ago and discover there are more hues than in the 1992 Klein bicycle catalog?
I doubt it, they didn't skip iOS 13, why would they skip iPhone 13?The number drop is something they need to do. They also should standardize their model naming conventions. The iPhone 19 Plus Pro Max S!!
I think Apple will just focus on the service side with ATV+ and less on providing the hardware.Apple will exit the Apple TV business, as they already have, over time. They've proven it by putting their Apple TV app on the Roku and Amazon Fire Stick.
Looking for the same, tho IMO it should start at 3k and then allow you to configure upward. Especially if they are going to keep the ARM Mac mini as limited as it currently is.Please please please a new mid tower Mac Pro! I don’t need another $6000 base model system but an upgradable tower at around $4k that was just like the 2000’s Mac Pro’s would be the sweet spot.
absolutely! I’m finding Apple’s product fragmentation under Cook to be reverting to Scully era. Not just naming schemes but too many of the same lines with ”Pro“ being mostly an excuse to add a wanted feature onto the higher end models and charging more. I’d also love to see a dedicated display line as Apple had in the 2000’s - most don’t need a $6000 display but a nice solid display. I miss the 30” and 23“ CCFL LCD‘s. It wouldn’t be a big cost issue for Apple to use an iMac LED panel in a display chassis and sell them. unlike some I’m loving my LG 5K UltraFine displays - have 3 with my Mac Pro’s - but I wouldn’t mind a nicely designed Apple display along with a midtower Mac Pro. There’s definitely a lot of people who don’t need or want an iMac Pro as they have external displays and need an upgradeable system.The number drop is something they need to do. They also should standardize their model naming conventions. The iPhone 19 Plus Pro Max S!!
absolutely! I’m finding Apple’s product fragmentation under Cook to be reverting to Scully era. Not just naming schemes but too many of the same lines with ”Pro“ being mostly an excuse to add a wanted feature onto the higher end models and charging more. I’d also love to see a dedicated display line as Apple had in the 2000’s - most don’t need a $6000 display but a nice solid display. I miss the 30” and 23“ CCFL LCD‘s. It wouldn’t be a big cost issue for Apple to use an iMac LED panel in a display chassis and sell them. unlike some I’m loving my LG 5K UltraFine displays - have 3 with my Mac Pro’s - but I wouldn’t mind a nicely designed Apple display along with a midtower Mac Pro. There’s definitely a lot of people who don’t need or want an iMac Pro as they have external displays and need an upgradeable system.
a guy can dream... meanwhile, cut back on the product fragmentation and simplify and streamline products.
No. I thought that too. But I looked it up the other day.There's a mistake here. "Mini-LED" displays are definitely not going to use "local dimming" that "dims the backlight," because "mini-LED" (I usually see these displays called "micro-LED") displays don't have backlights. Just like OLED displays.
LCD's have a white backlight, and then selectively filter that light to get RGB. Micro-LED's just have... microscopic LED's. Direct red, green, and blue lights. There's no backlight to dim. All "blacks" are true blacks, like on OLED's, because you aren't trying to completely block out a backlight, you're just not emitting any light from your LED's. So it's "perfect" blacks.
Well Apple had a huge market share in laptops with the Powerbooks.I agree with your observation to a point In the comparison to the Scully era. The difference is that the company is thriving right now even with all of the product fragmentation. Under Scully, Apple almost went belly up. I wonder why the different successes now as opposed to the mid to late 90s. Similar fragmentation, different results it would seem.