Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The colours of pink, blue, yellow, along with the rumours of lower cost, make me think that this will be the "MacBook" that is equivalent to the base iPad in the tablet lineup. I'd still rather they made an ultra-thin, high end MBA - but if they can go as low as £699 then it could be a great product.

Hopefully it launches with 256gb storage and that will force them to pushup the storage options on the Air/Pro.
 
Upon Steve Jobs return to Apple, his first order of business was to scrap the massive product lineup with confusing points of differentiation and created a simple product matrix.

Grid-of-4-2.png



This quite literally saved the company. Tim Cook is heading in the direction of Gil Amelio. I'm an Apple enthusiast and I have trouble explaining to friends what the point of difference is between the Air, Pro, Max, Plus, suffixes across product lines.
 
Hopefully Apple renames this chip to M-Something.

There is no real advantage to confusing their chip lineup even more. The M-series chips are "upgraded" iPhone chips anyway. So why muddy the water with this? Just call it M4-Lite or M4-ULP (Ultra Low Power) or something... Not like the chip names are etched in stone or whatever.
 
If it will cost $700 with 8GB and such a processor, it would be e-waste. Imagine buying the 16GB version for $900 of this to save... nothing in comparison to the M4 Air in next year?
 
The more I read about it, the more I see a baseline iPad with built-in keyboard running iPadOS and not a Macbook subset - and for only distinguishing marker to have the name MacBook slapped on it for sales/positioning reasons.
 
Upon Steve Jobs return to Apple, his first order of business was to scrap the massive product lineup with confusing points of differentiation and created a simple product matrix.

View attachment 2525386


This quite literally saved the company. Tim Cook is heading in the direction of Gil Amelio. I'm an Apple enthusiast and I have trouble explaining to friends what the point of difference is between the Air, Pro, Max, Plus, suffixes across product lines.
This quite literally saved the company, *when it was months away from bankruptcy*. Now Apple is a huge and successful company, and they still make way less products than any comparable hardware company.
 
Given the changes in OS26 there is no way this isn't running iPadOS which would be a lot better under an A18, given the iPad Mini is an A17. Would be the perfect time to resurrect the 13" white polycarbonate model of yore, only thinner and lighter.
 
The more I read about it, the more I see a baseline iPad with built-in keyboard running iPadOS and not a Macbook subset - and for only distinguishing marker to have the name MacBook slapped on it for sales/positioning reasons.
I bet it won’t happen. Just as macOS on a touch-first device would result in an awful experience, iPadOS wouldn’t be great on a mouse-first device. The chip has nothing to do with the OS of the device, it’s mainly the form factor.
 
No reason to buy this if its anything above 599, in the price ladder a18 pro to m4 would be the most cost effective upgrade, especially if Apple releases this w 8gb ram for 699 and its only 150-200 dollars extra to get M4 and double the RAM.
For $599, I would prefer a base iPad Air.
 
Pretty strange move, IMO. I'd love for Apple to refocus on a simple product matrix and make each product the best it can be at that price/performance level. Instead, they seem to have moved from an attitude of not worrying about self-cannibalization to actively encouraging it, as long as it involves pushing customers further up the price ladder. Long-term, this is a worse strategy, as it will reduce customer satisfaction when more people realize they overpaid for a machine that is beyond their needs.

I may be surprised when this comes out if it's actually reasonably priced and isn't a straight up rip off compared to the base M4 MBA, but I really don't expect that to be the case.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: G5isAlive
I bet it won’t happen. Just as macOS on a touch-first device would result in an awful experience, iPadOS wouldn’t be great on a mouse-first device. The chip has nothing to do with the OS of the device, it’s mainly the form factor.

It’s such a silly idea, not sure why they insist it’ll run iPadOS. They probably bet the farm the first iPad Pro with M1 would run macOS.
 
As I bought the M3 13'6 MBA last year, I will wait to 2nd version/year of this smaller MacBook.
To see and hear what users says, what can be better to next version etc.
But I really love that they are making this smaller Mac's again - exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mvdrl
I bet it won’t happen. Just as macOS on a touch-first device would result in an awful experience, iPadOS wouldn’t be great on a mouse-first device. The chip has nothing to do with the OS of the device, it’s mainly the form factor.
At least we know iPadOS works with a pointing device, as per the trackpad present on keyboard covers/contraptions (plus there is keyboard and mouse support in iPadOS) - unlike macOS that is not touch friendly at all, the UI isn't made for it.
 
So which would you rather have? a decent m4 laptop, an overpowered m4 iPad, a decent entry-level iPad or an underpowered a18 mac?
 
Upon Steve Jobs return to Apple, his first order of business was to scrap the massive product lineup with confusing points of differentiation and created a simple product matrix.

View attachment 2525386


This quite literally saved the company. Tim Cook is heading in the direction of Gil Amelio. I'm an Apple enthusiast and I have trouble explaining to friends what the point of difference is between the Air, Pro, Max, Plus, suffixes across product lines.
I agree with you to a point but we have not reached that level just yet...
 
  • Like
Reactions: progx
It’s such a silly idea, not sure why they insist it’ll run iPadOS. They probably bet the farm the first iPad Pro with M1 would run macOS.
You're probably not reacting to my initial post, but I feel the need to specify that I don't want this thing to run iPadOS, but I cannot see what alternative it can run - macOS on an Axx chip would need to be heavily restricted app-wise to maintain performance on 8 GB of RAM and limited storage, which could be Apple's plan for a limited Chromebook-like device anyway.

Anytime is possible, but I doubt Apple will sell this at the right pricepoint to matter - it will be too expensive for its limited usefulness, stuck somewhere between iPads and Macbooks, and no expandability whatsoever as to not endanger either existing product lines.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.