broken_keyboard said:Two things missing from Tiger are Internet Explorer and Stuff It Expander.
Well, I wouldn't exactly say I've been *missing* them.
broken_keyboard said:Two things missing from Tiger are Internet Explorer and Stuff It Expander.
Safari is not Netscape. Mozilla, Firefox and Netscape are all built on the same core rendering engine (just different releases of the engine). Safari is not.snickelfritz said:Safari does not work with my online print services' press submission utility.
Only IE will function. (I think it's a netscape issue, so I doubt that Safari 2.0 will address the issue)
broken_keyboard said:The Finder has built in support for zip files.
And of course Apple has their .dmg
rendezvouscp said:But I've got to wonder what "all your search are belong to us" means.
-Chase
Mechcozmo said:The only issue is that .zip files aren't always small enough. .sitx files have been able to, for me, cut a file down to half its size. Useful for large files (1.5 GB).
I'd like to see Aladdin work on making the compression go faster, but for a 1.5 GB file, anything is faster than sending it raw!
Linkety to the website. Look at Video #1.
rvmartinez said:And as for Internet Exploder, haven't you heard? It's already dead on the Mac - no more developement. All Apple is doing is giving it the burial that is due for it.
rvmartinez said:I for one have problems connecting to some financial institutions with Safari, and in those cases, I am forced to use IE... any suggestions?
rendezvouscp said:But I've got to wonder what "all your search are belong to us" means.
-Chase
jelloshotsrule said:just curious, what alternative would you recommend using? rather than stuffing (.sit)..?
Get a better bank? My bank specifically lists Safari as one of the supported browsers.rvmartinez said:I for one have problems connecting to some financial institutions with Safari, and in those cases, I am forced to use IE... any suggestions?
Yes, of course...weg said:A command line freak will of course prefer tar and gzip ;-)
The earlier trackpads are different of course and not all of them have the ability to scroll using the trackpad. I've been using the iScroll2 on my PowerBook without issues. The iScroll2 website has a page on how to tell if your iBook/PowerBook can do two finger scrolling.Kingsnapped said:I, for one, hope that cleardock and sidetrack still work. I can't stand going on other people's computers who don't have sidetrack. Is it possible that Tiger will give all laptops the trackpad functionality (two finger scrolling) that the newer Powerbooks have?
http://www.macmaps.com/browser.htmlrvmartinez said:And as for Internet Exploder, haven't you heard? It's already dead on the Mac - no more developement. All Apple is doing is giving it the burial that is due for it
I for one have problems connecting to some financial institutions with Safari, and in those cases, I am forced to use IE... any suggestions?
jelloshotsrule said:just curious, what alternative would you recommend using? rather than stuffing (.sit)..?
jholzner said:I would think .zip. It is pretty much a standard on Windows and 10.3 has a built in app to zip and unzip files.
Actually it's a GnuZip derivative that adds a special __MACOSX folder to zip files to deal with resource forks. The standard GnuZip doesn't do this because resource forks are Mac-specific.gopher said:Actually Zip on Mac OS X 10.3's Archive function is GnuZip instead of the Winzip/PkZip found on PCs. Not that there aren't freeware that support both standards on both platforms, but it is interesting they use different versions of Zip for both.
wrldwzrd89 said:I think I'll need to find a new program for unarchiving .RAR files, which I get all the time. I currently use Stuffit Expander for doing this.
wrldwzrd89 said:
Windows XP (Home and Pro) has a built-in zip compression and decompression utility.mkrishnan said:Ahhhh...*senses a pattern* I see. I may start using the RAR format just because it's so much fun to say! *rawr* But then again, tarball is fun to say too.Gnu people are so silly!
Out of curiousity, do the latest builds of Windows have zip built in (either via command line or clicking), or is WinZip still required?