Apple's benches tend to be on the high side, so I'm expecting the 2.8 to beat the 2.26 by a slight margin.
A question: Who are these computers designed for? Certainly not for someone like myself who wants to stay in the "PowerMac" line to play games and compress lots of video. Strangely, the upper model doesn't make much sense to buy as a professional either unless you're a company with a serious budget.
That's why I prefer 3rd party. At least the potential exists for less bias.
For some reason, I was under the impression many users (graphics/video pros), tend to be smaller companies and independants.
Any idea?
Even with educational discounts, it may be out of reach for many video/graphics students. I would think this would hurt Apple in the future, as they won't be so familiar with Macs and demand them from their employers or buy them for their own businesses. Perhaps a shift from Mac to, dare I say it, PC's as a result?
Assuming this is the case, I think Apple has been drinking too much of their own Koolaid these days.
At least when they determined MSRP.