Because if I pay a lot for something, I expect to get what I want, wouldn't you?
I understand if I paid a contract price for it.
I dont think that's too much to ask, seeing they have an abundance of supply now.
Do you think I have a case in getting a new one in sealed box, granted I bought it at full price without contract instead of discounted price with a contract?
Sorry for he rant ..... It just pisses me off when ppl say that you're not entitled to something when it's clearly not your fault as to your current issue with your device.
JP
Sorry for he rant ..... It just pisses me off when ppl say that you're not entitled to something when it's clearly not your fault as to your current issue with your device.
JP
If I paid for a product that is deemed to work for x amount of years
If this was the case, The latest iPhone would have most/if not everything that most consumers have been asking for.
But what do they do ?, they implement dumb things such as finger print sensor to unlock your phone..... What the heck do we need this for ATM ?.
It's just a "cool" factor, that's all.
Other then that, it's the most frustrating dumbest thing ever! My sensor rarely works on my 5s as I'm sure most are experiencing the same.
I say If something is not up to par with your device given that you bought into their propaganda and reviews then you should complain your ass off until you get what they "promised" you !.
....
Sorry for he rant ..... It just pisses me off when ppl say that you're not entitled to something when it's clearly not your fault as to your current issue with your device.
JP
Actually makes no difference. If anything, a few days old refurb with brand new battery, screen and case commands a higher premium than a year old phone when it's time to sell.
Personally, I think its B.S that ppl here have been programmed to think that one is not Entitled nor feel that they do not deserve what he/she is asking for if not in the window of their "company" return period.
This is absolutely ludicrous to me.
If I paid for a product that is deemed to work for x amount of years and are a leading company in this industry, but have x amount of products that are Mickey moused just to have it out and about to the masses. Why should I now down to them because of a fault of their product that is not mine nor any user for that matter ?.
It's pretty disgusting to know that fellow forum followers and others see it as the company has its consumers best interest.
If this was the case, The latest iPhone would have most/if not everything that most consumers have been asking for.
But what do they do ?, they implement dumb things such as finger print sensor to unlock your phone..... What the heck do we need this for ATM ?.
It's just a "cool" factor, that's all.
Other then that, it's the most frustrating dumbest thing ever! My sensor rarely works on my 5s as I'm sure most are experiencing the same.
So like I said, these big name manufacturers are out for themselves competing with other big company's for bragging rights.
I say If something is not up to par with your device given that you bought into their propaganda and reviews then you should complain your ass off until you get what they "promised" you !.
No way should you let them run all over you. You paid an arm and a leg (not really but it's one of the most expensive phones on the market) for your device so HECK yes!, fight and get what you deserve !.
Sorry for he rant ..... It just pisses me off when ppl say that you're not entitled to something when it's clearly not your fault as to your current issue with your device.
JP
Contract or not, you aren't entitled to anything buddy. You accepted the terms and want to cheat the system. You will be wasting their time.
I have bought a lot of cars. I don't demand a new one just because I don't like something. Close to 1k is cute. I spent thousands on Mac and Apple products.
I don't think the OP wishes to cheat the system. For example, a car doesn't come in a box like a phone, but when shopping for an old classic car, one with "matching numbers" for the engine and transmission is usually more desirable, thus stimulating interest from more people and an exclusive set of shoppers, and a potentially higher return.
Like car shopping, an iPhone 5s with a matching box/receipt is much more desirable when it comes to reselling the next year to cushion the cost of staying up to date with the latest model, which I assume is the intent of the OP. Considering s/he spent more than the average cost of the base model, he has more money at stake, and less likelyhood of maximizing his return.
I don't think the OP wishes to cheat the system. For example, a car doesn't come in a box like a phone, but when shopping for an old classic car, one with "matching numbers" for the engine and transmission is usually more desirable, thus stimulating interest from more people and an exclusive set of shoppers, and a potentially higher return.
Like car shopping, an iPhone 5s with a matching box/receipt is much more desirable when it comes to reselling the next year to cushion the cost of staying up to date with the latest model, which I assume is the intent of the OP. Considering s/he spent more than the average cost of the base model, he has more money at stake, and less likelyhood of maximizing his return.
Sure, but he wants it for free. Your example is good but it's like he bought a car off the dealership, comes back two months later, and wants a new one. He's buying new, not buying classics.
Except it doesn't work that way in practice when it comes to the iPhone. If you screen the sold prices of original vs. replacement (usually mentioned within description) on ebay, you'll find no difference. In fact, a few days old replacement iPhone in mint condition (with brand new battery, screen and case) can go for more than a year-old original, number-matched unit.