Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For people saying inflation, no. You can calculate it out yourselves, but Apple also added a ****load of money on top of that inflation. It's R&D, inflation, and Apple's extra "tax" (Quite ironic) for these latter two, and the premium costs.
 
I'm sure the 2008 and 2012 MacBook Pros were quite expensive for their time too. People have just forgotten how much new tech costs because it's been too long for them.

Exactly, people are just forgetful and have selective memory. It's like they're not even realizing that the models this year have 256gb SSD's as the base storage which used to be a $200-$300 upgrade. Either that or their spoiled and simply complaining for the sake of complaining.

Lets look at the price of the 13-inch MacBook Pro back in 2012 with the 256gb SSD version shall we?
https://www.apple.com/pr/library/20...-13-inch-MacBook-Pro-with-Retina-Display.html
The 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display is available with a 2.5 GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor with Turbo Boost speeds up to 3.1 GHz, 8GB of memory and 128GB of flash storage starting at $1,699 (US); and with 256GB of flash storage starting at $1,999 (US).

Not so expensive now eh? :rolleyes:

***this post applies to people in the U.S.A. only as I'm not getting into the whole Brexit / VAT / exchange rate argument.
 
Last edited:
There was an article on another Mac site that suggested computers in general were priced higher to offset lower volumes.
This because less and less people are buying desktops/computers but buying smart phones instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luba and Ghost31
There was an article on another Mac site that suggested computers in general were priced higher to offset lower volumes.
This because less and less people are buying desktops/computers but buying smart phones instead.

Which I think is just stupid logic. It's punishing those who are already looking for computers, and making those considering to purchase possibly not buy. It's a negative-feedback loop with horrific ramifications.
 
Not just inflation. But also research and development. This isn't just a spec bump, which is what a lot of people seem to be treating it as. As much as the new MacBook Pros share with their predecessors cosmetically, the new models are completely redesigned. The form factor is different, the trackpad larger, the keyboard uses a different mechanism, and hinges are all-new, et cetera.

I'm sure the 2008 and 2012 MacBook Pros were quite expensive for their time too. People have just forgotten how much new tech costs because it's been too long for them. I'm sure the cost for components like the CPU, RAM, and SSD aren't that much more for Apple over the last-gen components, but new stuff like the OLED panel in the Touch Bar, the TouchID reader, all-new T1 security enclave, et cetera should add to the cost as well.
Issue with that is wages haven't increased really from 2008/2012
 
Have the component parts gone up in price? I would think the component prices (SSD, GPU, etc.) have gone down or stayed the same in price over the years. Has Apple identified a new demographic they can exploit? Or perhaps, the top of line 15" MacBook have taken a huge jump in performance?

For a long time, you could get a decent performing entry level MacBook for $1200, but now that decent entry level has crept up a couple of hundred dollars. And you could get "last year's model" for under $1200.

For a long time, a top of the line 15" MacBook would cost around $2,500, or if you max'd it out completely it would be just under $3,000. Now, it's over $4,000! Some configurations of the Mac Pro cost less the new MacBook!
It's a combination between a better processor, r&d and OLED touch bar.
 
Make up for earnings reports. This is a company that uses proprietary ports for their phones so companies wishing to use it pay a massive per unit licensing fee. Not to mention the fact these dongles cost less than a buck to make over at Foxconn, yet there's a $49 premium. For a ****ing cable.

You cannot, in good faith, tell me Apple increased prices because of R&D costs, ACROSS THE BOARD FOR ALL THEIR HARDWARE, to make up for R&D costs. Not to mention increasing the prices of refurbished units. You've got to be kidding me. They're used hardware that's more than 2 years old. Why is that getting a price increase? This is a company that was once revolutionary and pushed PC OEMs to increase their quality. The hardware now and three years ago is vastly different. All thanks to Apple putting the pressure on.
I used to hear people saying exactly what you're saying and dismiss them as just stupid disgruntled people that have a negative view of apple

...now I believe every word you said. This is pure profit. Nothing else. Not inflation. Not cost to accommodate new tech. Nope. Just "I want money. You're gonna pay it. I know it"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avalontor
Exactly, people are just forgetful and have selective memory. It's like they're not even realizing that the models this year have 256gb SSD's as the base storage which used to be a $200-$300 upgrade. Either that or their spoiled and simply complaining for the sake of complaining.

Lets look at the price of the 13-inch MacBook Pro back in 2012 with the 256gb SSD version shall we?
https://www.apple.com/pr/library/20...-13-inch-MacBook-Pro-with-Retina-Display.html


Not so expensive now eh? :rolleyes:

***this post applies to people in the U.S.A. only as I'm not getting into the whole Brexit / VAT / exchange rate argument.
Cool. How about next year Apple changes nothing then and then starts the price off as $1200 MORE than what it is right now because now a 2tb ssd is standard. Then you can come in and say "well last year it was a built to order option at the same price. So you see. They didn't increase the price at all really! Kinda"
 
These prices are really unprecedentedly high. I am curious to see how well they sell a quarter from now. I think apple may have priced them so high that consumers are simply not going to buy it. Apple has crossed a line this time. I don't think many people can simply afford these laptops. Looks like a Cartier ring. Many want, few can afford.
[doublepost=1477763678][/doublepost]
These prices are really unprecedentedly high. I am curious to see how well they sell a quarter from now. I think apple may have priced them so high that consumers are simply not going to buy it. Apple has crossed a line this time. I don't think many people can simply afford these laptops. Looks like a Cartier ring. Many want, few can afford.

I also fully agree. Apple needs better stock performance and a huge increase in selling price is going to help their stock. The pure profit they are making is an extra $200-500 on average per laptop. If they moved half to 1/3 of their usual volume they will still break even. I think they are counting on being able to sell 55% of their usual volume at these prices. I can't imagine these notebooks will sell in the volumes that apple is used to. Crazy high prices
 
I used to hear people saying exactly what you're saying and dismiss them as just stupid disgruntled people that have a negative view of apple

...now I believe every word you said. This is pure profit. Nothing else. Not inflation. Not cost to accommodate new tech. Nope. Just "I want money. You're gonna pay it. I know it"
Yep... it's a perfect example of a free-market economy. They sell high quality, well designed products and charge a high price because there are plenty of people interested in paying it. High end Car companies, and watch makers, and clothing manufacturers, and dozens of other industries do the same... Would you really do differently if you ran a similar company? Their "greed" is no different than the "greed" of consumers who express indignation and demand the same product for a lesser price... we're not entitled to have these products, after all. They're not basic necessities like water and electricity. If you think a Bently is overpriced, just buy a Honda or a Chrysler instead...
 
Last edited:
tim nods! The problem is that nowadays, competition is not shipping so much junk.
You mean that $3000 desktop filled with legacy tech that MSFT released isn't MSFT shipping junk? It was interesting to see MSFT releasing an all-in-one but Apple has had those specs in their all-in-one for a year already and for half the cost.
[doublepost=1477764694][/doublepost]
These prices are really unprecedentedly high. I am curious to see how well they sell a quarter from now. I think apple may have priced them so high that consumers are simply not going to buy it. Apple has crossed a line this time. I don't think many people can simply afford these laptops. Looks like a Cartier ring. Many want, few can afford.
[doublepost=1477763678][/doublepost]

I also fully agree. Apple needs better stock performance and a huge increase in selling price is going to help their stock. The pure profit they are making is an extra $200-500 on average per laptop. If they moved half to 1/3 of their usual volume they will still break even. I think they are counting on being able to sell 55% of their usual volume at these prices. I can't imagine these notebooks will sell in the volumes that apple is used to. Crazy high prices
Apple is going to drop the price in six months just like they did in 2012.
 
greed....and I guess...euhhhh greed. And what else? greed? yeah, I think greed

but you know, there's a Apple logo on the back, so its allowed, these prices.
 
Exactly, people are just forgetful and have selective memory. It's like they're not even realizing that the models this year have 256gb SSD's as the base storage which used to be a $200-$300 upgrade. Either that or their spoiled and simply complaining for the sake of complaining.

Lets look at the price of the 13-inch MacBook Pro back in 2012 with the 256gb SSD version shall we?
https://www.apple.com/pr/library/20...-13-inch-MacBook-Pro-with-Retina-Display.html


Not so expensive now eh? :rolleyes:

***this post applies to people in the U.S.A. only as I'm not getting into the whole Brexit / VAT / exchange rate argument.
Good point as the new 13" MBP at $2k gets you 512GB of SSD storage. But 4 years later I would think/feel SSD prices would go down even further than just getting us double the storage (512 vs 256). After 4 years, 1TB feels more like it. Then again, the new MBP has Touch Bar, so I suppose the pricing of the new MBP isn't out of the ordinary for Apple.

But somehow this time it feels like Apple took an extra jump in price, even though your example shows it's more of the same. Maybe because the top of the line 15" is now $4,300 which is shocking to me. Are the specs of that top of the line 15" like a high end custom gaming laptop? Does it perform in the league of the entry level 2013 Mac Pro (black trash can)?
 
You mean that $3000 desktop filled with legacy tech that MSFT released isn't MSFT shipping junk? It was interesting to see MSFT releasing an all-in-one but Apple has had those specs in their all-in-one for a year already and for half the cost.
[doublepost=1477764694][/doublepost]
Apple is going to drop the price in six months just like they did in 2012.

Put down the shill pill. No Apple desktop or laptop has a touchscreen, none of them use Nvidia chipsets, and the 980m crushes the 395m
[doublepost=1477764957][/doublepost]
Good point as the new 13" MBP at $2k gets you 512GB of SSD storage. But 4 years later I would think/feel SSD prices would go down even further than just getting us double the storage (512 vs 256). After 4 years, 1TB feels more like it. Then again, the new MBP has Touch Bar, so I suppose the pricing of the new MBP isn't out of the ordinary for Apple.

But somehow this time it feels like Apple took an extra jump in price, even though your example shows it's more of the same. Maybe because the top of the line 15" is now $4,300 which is shocking to me. Are the specs of that top of the line 15" like a high end custom gaming laptop. Does it perform in the league of the entry level 2013 Mac Pro (black trash can)?

You can get 1tb sata ssds on sale for $130-$150. You are damn right prices have dropped. They always do, the difference is Apple raises their prices.
 
You have the touch bar and you have all of the apps that were updated to include the touch bar. Those app updates are being offered for free, but the money to develop those updates has to come from somewhere, so I'm guessing it's coming from the hardware costs.
 
Cool. How about next year Apple changes nothing then and then starts the price off as $1200 MORE than what it is right now because now a 2tb ssd is standard. Then you can come in and say "well last year it was a built to order option at the same price. So you see. They didn't increase the price at all really! Kinda"

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If they want to as a company they are free to keep increasing the storage, ram, etc and pricing people out. They made a calculation and if you don't like it feel free to vote with your wallet.

You could also use your argument above for any price increase and say something like "well 6 years ago we had 64gb SSDs and 2gb of RAM so I can't believe they made 128gb SSD and 4gb of RAM standard and increased the price $200 more! Those bastards!"

My point is that its not like they aren't including something substantial with the price increase (256gb SSD is a nice 'punishment'). You guys make it seem like Apple simply increased the price without offering anything in return :rolleyes:
 
You people arguing that a touch bar is worth a $300-$500 price increase are hilarious considering I got a:

Alienware 13 r2
8gb ram (Now 16)
256gb pm951 pcie-ssd (Which tbh I changed to a Samsung 950 pro)
i5-6200u
960m
2560x1440 OLED touchscreen

For around $1200. That's right, an entire high res oled touchscreen.

Oh and this keyboard is bigger and far better then my old macbooks. I can actually type pretty fast on it.
 
I think it's pretty obvious. $200 was added to recoup the costs of R&D. $300 was added for the Touch Bar (plus the Apple Watch chip that powers it).

Prices will come down by about $200 over the next couple refreshes.
And there was no R&D on the previous generation?
 
We've entered the era of the mobile market, demand for pc has been shrinking for years. It is once again a niche market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdonisSMU
Put down the shill pill. No Apple desktop or laptop has a touchscreen, none of them use Nvidia chipsets, and the 980m crushes the 395m
Still that doesn't justify a cost of $3000 starting. Having a touch display and a better graphics chip doesn't justify the machine being double the price of a comparable iMac. Sorry, I burst your bubble and made so much sense that you had to start name calling. If I'm a shill I'm terrible at it because I've also criticized Apple in previous threads over the price of the new MacBook Pros and questioned various other decisions they've made previously.
[doublepost=1477768941][/doublepost]
You people arguing that a touch bar is worth a $300-$500 price increase are hilarious considering I got a:

Alienware 13 r2
8gb ram (Now 16)
256gb pm951 pcie-ssd (Which tbh I changed to a Samsung 950 pro)
i5-6200u
960m
2560x1440 OLED touchscreen

For around $1200. That's right, an entire high res oled touchscreen.

Oh and this keyboard is bigger and far better then my old macbooks. I can actually type pretty fast on it.
I hate big keyboards with way too much travel. I am a light touch person. I don't rest my wrists on the keyboard. I also don't appreciate the noise generated by keyboards with lots of travel. We had a guy at work you used them and everyone in the office was annoyed by his use of the high travel keyboard and would say so when he wasn't around.

Everyone who I know that owns a touch display laptop or desktop has admitted they simply don't use it that way. When I myself had a touchscreen HP desktop and a Surface I also never used the touch display. I'm trying to do work with my laptop not play games in my moms basement. I don't need features tacked on just to check off a box on a spec sheet that I'm never going to use.

We are in agreement that the price is steep for the new MacBook Pros though. However, I suspect that once the R&D is recouped the price on them will go down on MacBook Pros. I say 6 months from now the current MacBooks will drop in price by $200 bucks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31
Still that doesn't justify a cost of $3000 starting. Having a touch display and a better graphics chip doesn't justify the machine being double the price of a comparable iMac. Sorry, I burst your bubble and made so much sense that you had to start name calling. If I'm a shill I'm terrible at it because I've also criticized Apple in previous threads over the price of the new MacBook Pros and questioned various other decisions they've made previously.
[doublepost=1477768941][/doublepost]
I hate big keyboards with way too much travel. I am a light touch person. I don't rest my wrists on the keyboard. I also don't appreciate the noise generated by keyboards with lots of travel. We had a guy at work you used them and everyone in the office was annoyed by his use of the high travel keyboard and would say so when he wasn't around.

Everyone who I know that owns a touch display laptop or desktop has admitted they simply don't use it that way. When I myself had a touchscreen HP desktop and a Surface I also never used the touch display. I'm trying to do work with my laptop not play games in my moms basement. I don't need features tacked on just to check off a box on a spec sheet that I'm never going to use.

We are in agreement that the price is steep for the new MacBook Pros though. However, I suspect that once the R&D is recouped the price on them will go down on MacBook Pros. I say 6 months from now the current MacBooks will drop in price by $200 bucks.

You are either shilling or being obtuse. This isn't a typical desktop, it's also a touchscreen workstation. A 27" Wacom pen and touch device is $2,800:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1113580-REG/wacom_dth_2700_cintiq_27qhd_27_creative.html

Perhaps they should come up with a non touch screen version, but the imac is not comparable in it's current form.
 
Exactly, people are just forgetful and have selective memory. It's like they're not even realizing that the models this year have 256gb SSD's as the base storage which used to be a $200-$300 upgrade. Either that or their spoiled and simply complaining for the sake of complaining.

That's not a good reason.

The price of SSD has gone down significantly since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Count Blah
Any expensive computer can eventually pay for itself thanks to the miracle of free entertainment from the Internet. Even if you don't want to pirate copyrighted content, you can still be entertained for hours with YouTube, Pandora, or any legal or mature sites out there.

We get HALF A DECADE or more usage with MacBooks. That's cool. With smartphone, we get more attached but by saying we love it but we also can grow tired of it very quickly and start hating it since we look at it and abuse it all the time. That's also another reason for the shorter life cycles.

$1500 for a MBP 13 is not a bad deal when you consider the contracts we are put in with carriers and cable/satellite provider contracts that matches that cost within a year and nobody is even watching most of the stuff on TV since everyone is too busy being online on their phone, tablet, or computer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.