Seems like a huge disadvantage when comparing it to the Surface. Is Apple afraid of crippling the MacBook market?
A trackpad needs a cursor on screen in order to function. Adding a cursor into an iOS will transform it into a mess because it was designed for touch input, not for mouse input.
Microsoft has been trying to mix touch with mouse input for some time and Windows still looks like a combination of two worlds apart.
You want mouse, keyboard and trackpad - you want a Macbook.
A trackpad needs a cursor on screen in order to function. Adding a cursor into an iOS will transform it into a mess because it was designed for touch input, not for mouse input.
Microsoft has been trying to mix touch with mouse input for some time and Windows still looks like a combination of two worlds apart.
You want mouse, keyboard and trackpad - you want a Macbook.
Seems like a huge disadvantage when comparing it to the Surface. Is Apple afraid of crippling the MacBook market?
Apple likes to do things incrementally. The introduction of the 2-finger drag on the onscreen keyboard to move the text cursor was the first step. That is very useful and I can see Apple offering a follow on keyboard cover that provides a trackpad space that simply mimics that behavior. Very doable. I wouldn't be surprised to see it within a year.Seems like a huge disadvantage when comparing it to the Surface. Is Apple afraid of crippling the MacBook market?
Actually it wouldn't "transform it into a mess". Some of us have used the BT Mouse tool available for jailbroken iPads and it works with iOS in the same manner as a physical keyboard. When it isn't detected, there's no pointer.A trackpad needs a cursor on screen in order to function. Adding a cursor into an iOS will transform it into a mess because it was designed for touch input, not for mouse input.
Are you saying that because Microsoft can't get it right that it is impossible to do? If Apple believed that, they would never have attempted the iPad in the first place. Back in 1999-2001, Microsoft and their partners produced tablets. They were horrible.Microsoft has been trying to mix touch with mouse input for some time and Windows still looks like a combination of two worlds apart.
That is an oversimplification of the usefulness and flexibility of having a tablet that supports an optional keyboard and trackpad.You want mouse, keyboard and trackpad - you want a Macbook.
A trackpad needs a cursor on screen in order to function. Adding a cursor into an iOS will transform it into a mess because it was designed for touch input, not for mouse input.
Microsoft has been trying to mix touch with mouse input for some time and Windows still looks like a combination of two worlds apart.
You want mouse, keyboard and trackpad - you want a Macbook.
What slippery slope was created by providing support for a hardware keyboard? (which by the way Apple produced on day-1 for the iPad 1). What applications were produced that took advantage of keyboard shortcuts that were only viable via a physical keyboard? What slippery slope was created by providing a hardware-assisted Pencil?iOS was designed to be used with a finger. If you want precision input, you can use a Pencil, which is basically a much more precise finger. This is how Apple envisioned their touch devices from the very beginning. The users must interact with the screen directly, not through intermediary devices moving a cursor on the screen. Like it or not, there is simply no place for a cursor in iOS. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it does not belong there.
And if they start mixing things and adding support for a cursor in iOS, it'll be a slippery slope. Some users will demand support for mouse in all apps. Then they'll want OS X on the tablet because hey, if it has mouse, trackpad and keyboard, why not just run OS X on it? And if an iPad runs OS X, how about adding a touchscreen to a Macbook? And add support for finger interactions in OS X? Do you really think Apple is willing to go down that road? I don't think so.
As has been pointed out in other threads, if jailbroken cursor can be there with mouse attachment. Jail break didn't add cursor gui functionality ....it just unlocked the feature already in place. These people aren't asking for a new feature....its there already.
What slippery slope was created by providing support for a hardware keyboard? (which by the way Apple produced on day-1 for the iPad 1).
The further down you go on the slippery slope the weaker you make your case.
A trackpad needs a cursor on screen in order to function. Adding a cursor into an iOS will transform it into a mess because it was designed for touch input, not for mouse input.
Microsoft has been trying to mix touch with mouse input for some time and Windows still looks like a combination of two worlds apart.
You want mouse, keyboard and trackpad - you want a Macbook.
iOS was designed to be used with a finger. If you want precision input, you can use a Pencil, which is basically a much more precise finger. .
Seems like a huge disadvantage when comparing it to the Surface.
Now that Apple has officially launched iPad pro with a keyboard, the gorilla arms problem is still an issue.
Are you saying that because Microsoft can't get it right that it is impossible to do? If Apple believed that, they would never have attempted the iPad in the first place. Back in 1999-2001, Microsoft and their partners produced tablets. They were horrible.
But this is nothing more than habit. And habit should not dictate anything.
The iPad has an ENTIRE OS AND USER INTERFACE designed for touch. Adding any sort of cursor tracking is not an option, and not happening. Its just not. It is touch OS, not a mouse OS, and thats the end of it.
Moving on.
if you ever try writing web apps that need to work with touch & mouse: getting them to work, sort-of, with both is easy - getting them to work well with both is hard. You just don't design mouse-driven apps and touch-driven apps the same way.
Imagine a mouse/trackpad pointer for MS office for ios. Total win--its just the nature of the task that lends itself to a curser
I'm a software developer and getting them to work well is not hard, but it does require some upfront design. But that's not what anyone is advocating. We're not talking about designing apps optimized for both, but keeping the apps optimized for touch but allowing mouse navigation.NB: if you ever try writing web apps that need to work with touch & mouse: getting them to work, sort-of, with both is easy - getting them to work well with both is hard. You just don't design mouse-driven apps and touch-driven apps the same way.
Like it or not--ipad pro plus keyboard is very laptop like. Where apple wants to go with this is unclear.This is where I think Apple made a mistake by offering the type cover. It basically tricks people into thinking the iPad Pro is similar to a laptop, which is certainly not.
It most definitely is similar to a laptop. It isn't identical. There's a difference.This is where I think Apple made a mistake by offering the type cover. It basically tricks people into thinking the iPad Pro is similar to a laptop, which is certainly not.
Do you think that Zagg, Logitech, etc. also made mistakes by offering keyboard covers for the iPad? I get the impression that you think that the iPad Pro is the first iPad to have a keyboard option.