I think it's safe to say that the future of computing will be in tablets, and as we have seen since 2010, the iPad is getting more and more useful for everyday tasks. Whilst today, I wouldn't dare say it can take over mainstream computers for everyone, as it lacks power and functionality of a file system (and many other things..), I would go as far to say that it will * someday * be our main computers, doing all tasks from design, to databases, to hardcore gaming and everything in between..
My question to the forum is, when?
Obviously, no one knows, but with some discussion, could be conclude on a realistic and potential year?
Only when it runs OSX and enables me to have the flexibility of a proper OS instead of the locked down iOS. Probably never then.
Nope. Never. And quite honestly I don't want them to ever screw the iPad up trying to make it a hybrid or whatever. What's wrong with having separate products for separate use cases? STOP with this everything in one chassis stuff.
UGH!![]()
This stop everything in one chassis argument doesn't sit well from me. People made the same argument about combining a GPS, Palm Pilot, and cell phone. Now we have an iPhone and nobody is making the claim we should separate the devices.
I am a big ipad fan, but multitasking is still a problem. Caused by little ram , super slow storage and no paging to it.I'm able to do all my work on the Dell which has less juice than both the iPads. I'd say we're already there my friend.
Obviously, there are those out there who need much more power than I do. And there will always be the need for various niche computers like Mac Pros and servers and supercomputers and such. But as far as the everyday personal computer? For many, the iPad is already there. Developers just need to catch up writing apps that can take advantage of the power at their disposal.
I don't think there's any app out there that uses the A7's full potential.
I am a big ipad fan, but multitasking is still a problem. Caused by little ram , super slow storage and no paging to it.
The storage is slow. Ssds in macbooks do about 700mb/s. The ipads NAND flash 20mb/s.Slow storage? You mean slow RAM?
According to geekbench, memory scores are far better on the iPad than my Dell I mentioned.....
Obviously, more RAM = better multitasking. But "multitasking" is, IMO, overrated.....unless you can hook the iPad up to multiple monitors or split screen.
Those are two place where an iPad would lose out to this Dell I'm on. Because this Dell is hooked up to two monitors and I have two windows up simultaneously.
The point of my post was, based on processor power - we're there. Its just a matter of writing software that takes advantage.
The storage is slow. Ssds in macbooks do about 700mb/s. The ipads NAND flash 20mb/s.
I also use my ipads as extentions of my computers and I multitask all the time.
if ios could swap and they would put ssds in them i would benefit greatly.
This stop everything in one chassis argument doesn't sit well from me. People made the same argument about combining a GPS, Palm Pilot, and cell phone. Now we have an iPhone and nobody is making the claim we should separate the devices.
iPad is already the "main computer" for light usage.
Modern tablets are sidekicks for PCs, not full-blown PC replacements.
Fair enough. We can disagree on this. I just feel that in order to try and make a device be everything to everyone will force it to have shortcomings that it wouldn't have if it was used for just it's intended purpose. The phone, GPS, palm pilot thing is a little different than trying to make a full blown computer and a tablet be the same thing. MUCH more complicated doing the computer thing, IMO.
That classic saying "jack of all trades, master of none" keeps coming to mind.
Maybe I'm taking this too far. I think for iPad's to keep being relevant Apple needs to keep adding features. Thinner and faster is dandy for a few generations but I would like to eventually see more functionality.
Maybe I'm taking this too far. I think for iPad's to keep being relevant Apple needs to keep adding features. Thinner and faster is dandy for a few generations but I would like to eventually see more functionality.
my ipad air is my main computer...
i sold my macbook air because i didn't use it....
ipad air can already be the main computer... as i wrote in another thread many people use their macbook air or retina pro for simple tasks that you can do even better with an ipad...
obviously if you use adobe literoom or Photoshop in heavy tasks you need a macbook
but for 99% of tasks is enough... especially browsing... music...
Seriously dont you ever download any torrents?
If "downloading torrents" is all someone can come up with when asked if the iPad can be a main computer, I'd say it already is.
Oh....btw....
http://www.maketecheasier.com/download-torrents-without-jailbreaking/
Thanks... how do i add subs too?
Just joking mate...
My iPad story is: every year i buy the newest ipad or mini and usually after 3-5 months i usually sell it.... because it is my go to go toilet device.
- Safari autorefresh is frustrating when i open lots of tabs and i am about to post sth on forums.
- I even prefer in bed my MBA which i think is more stable while laying down and watching a movie.
- Copy and paste still has not reached "natural levels" of usability.
- Swipe in MBA between apps is a lot more natural and quicker than "multitasking" on ipad.
- MBA is light enough to use it everywhere in the house... if i want to check sth like tweetbot or an email i will do it on my iphone...
The problem is that after some months of owning an iPad i try to find ways in order to use it... and honestly i dont need it when i have the perfect combo for me which is MBA and iPhone.... i even read ibooks on my iphone without any problem. I hope Apple will give us a retina and even lighter MBA.![]()