Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SandboxGeneral

Moderator emeritus
Sep 8, 2010
26,481
10,008
Detroit
I have no one-stop-shop for apps on OS X. I usually search the Internet or the MAS for what I am looking for. I do that in no particular order with no preference for either.

But, at the same time, I don't get apps on OS X all too often. I have my core set of apps that serve my needs and that's usually all I stick to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel

The Economist

Suspended
Apr 4, 2011
293
40
Mexico
Sometimes I Just google what I need, which sometimes leads me to an old thread right here (Macrumors). That's how I found Handbrake and VLC so many years ago.
 

flynz4

macrumors 68040
Aug 9, 2009
3,214
110
Portland, OR
MAS or developer site. Developer site first, MAS second.
I do the same... except that in most cases, if the same software is available on both MAS and Developer site... I prioritize the MAS first.

My rationale: In most cases, it vastly simplifies updates. Non MAS software mostly checks for new updates when you launch the application... which for convenience, is the absolute worst time to perform an update... because it is exactly when you want to use the application. Microsoft Office updates frustrate me the most... because they are usually somewhat slow updates.

By contrast, the MAS facilitates updates asynchronous to their use... so they update at more convenient times.

A second advantage of the MAS is that the software is generally easier to share across multiple computers and family members. Most MAS software also supports family sharing, which makes it more economical if you have several family members who need the same applications.

The downside of MAS is that sometimes, Apple restrictions (ex: sandboxing) limit the functions that developers can place in the MAS version of their products. An example that I've come across is TextExpander, where the developer version has higher feature sets than the MAS version. Sometimes these restriction are good, but sometimes they get in the way. Of course, the opposite also true. For example, one of my favorite applications (1Password) at one time had (or maybe still does) restrictions on the developer site version where it would not support iCloud synchronization... hence the MAS version is more highly featured.

Still... at the end of the day, the convenience of updates from the MAS almost always have me choose the MAS version first.

/Jim
 
Last edited:

Evren Carven

macrumors regular
Dec 16, 2014
238
21
I use MAS to download apps. The reason is simple, when the apps have a update, you will be automated to update without more operation from the MAS updates. As we know, due to Apple's rule, some apps cannot be loaded in MAS. In this situation, you can only get them from website.
 

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
387
.nl
I do the same... except that in most cases, if the same software is available on both MAS and Developer site... I prioritize the MAS first.

My rationale: In most cases, it vastly simplifies updates. Non MAS software mostly checks for new updates when you launch the application... which for convenience, is the absolute worst time to perform an update... because it is exactly when you want to use the application. Microsoft Office updates frustrate me the most... because they are usually somewhat slow updates.
I do it the other way, order via developer first and only via MAS if no other option or if this is the best option. Ordering via the developer allows me to first use a trial version and register it if I like the app. It allows me to get discounts when upgrading to a newer version, when buying another product, when buying in bulk and/or when buying a bundle pack (say app a + b + c or OS X + Windows version). That means that it is a lot cheaper to get things directly from the developer.

Updating the MAS also comes at an inconvenient time but the advantage is indeed that you can hit 1 button and update everything at once. When buying apps via the developer you need to go through them all 1 by 1. However, you don't have to continuously check for updates because the apps and the app store do it themselves. They'll bug you about it and you can either go ahead and install it or simply ignore it till the next time. You can pick your own convenient time ;) The MAS makes this a bit easier though and can even do it automatically (which is not to be recommended since crappy updates are also installed which can render the app useless). There are 3rd party apps that do this for non-MAS apps as well (MacUpdate has one for example).
The biggest problem is the update intervals of the MAS. They have to be reviewed first and can be rejected. Via the developer you are only limited by their speed. This has led to security updates and bug fixes being brought out much quicker for non-MAS apps. When you have a zero day exploit that is already being actively exploited speed is essential.

A second advantage of the MAS is that the software is generally easier to share across multiple computers and family members. Most MAS software also supports family sharing, which makes it more economical if you have several family members who need the same applications.
That depends on the license. Lots of apps already had a license that allowed you to install it on every machine you control/own/work on, some have introduced this after the MAS. There also equivalent licensing that allows you to use it on up to x number of machines. I've seen licenses from non-MAS apps that are much better then what the MAS offers. I get to use it on my work machines for example.
MAS does allow for family sharing but only if the developer allows it too. In reality not that many apps are allowed to be used with family sharing plus there are lots of other issues with family sharing itself (simply put: it is not working). If you don't have a family where you want/can share the apps this is useless anyway.

I have mixed feelings about the MAS. It can be quite convenient but it can also be a very very inconvenient place. Especially when it comes to upgrades and bundles. Apple really needs to fix those things and add a trial function to it as well. Microsofts store is better in that regard.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.