Just curious which screen are the best out of the two manufacturers that I've seen around here.
The consensus tells me the 9c99 is better?
The consensus tells me the 9c99 is better?
Just curious which screen are the best out of the two manufacturers that I've seen around here.
The consensus tells me the 9c99 is better?
Reading this thread, everyone seems happier with the 9c99.
I personally have the 9c99 and am pleased.
I do think all the screens are dimmer in the 17 UMBP's though compared to the previous model and 15 inch unibodies..
This is something rumored to be fixed in a software update next week.
I have the 9c99 and its looks great! Personally, I don't have any issues in the way of brightness. I don't even have my brightness up to the half way point. This display is the best I have seen on a laptop.![]()
So by your logic Apple should keep making the Display brighter with each revision just so on paper they can say its better then the old one.
At which point should we complain about having our faces melted off?![]()
at least make its brightness options equivalent to last years 17 inch MBP and 15 inch UMBP. It is much dimmer at equal settings when putting it side by side to these old laptops.
Who will be using the new 17" side-by-side with one of last year's 15"?
He's just asking that the new 17" be as bright as the 15". What's wrong with that? Why are you drawing absurd conclusions where none is even implied? Or are you trying to belittle people who have reasonable complaints and concerns?
You obviously think your 17" display is bright as it should be and can go as bright as the 24" display, but there are 17" MBPs in stores that are so dim that they're hardly usable in a bright or moderately lit environment. The 15", on the other hand, is bright enough.
Just because you have a perfect MBP display doesn't mean that problems don't exist for other people.
I think Apple should set the options so that when your laptop is set to max brightness, the screen is as bright as the specification of the LED safely allows. It's a simple solution, no? Max = maximum that the LED can emit within spec. If that's why the 17" MBP's screen isn't as bright as the 15" MBP at max brightness, then so be it.
I don't think Apple should simply make both the 17" and 15" have equal brightness. That would mean intentionally limiting one of the machines so that one doesn't look brighter than the other. I think it sets a bad precedent.
If they need to set the LED to produce slightly more light than its specifications say it can, just so that customers feel that their screen is as bright as a 15" MBP, then perhaps people are being unreasonable.
I got the 17" 2.66 with the 9c98. It has the annoying bluish tint out of the box and also is dimmer than my 15" uni. I'm going to see if i can swap for another 2.66 with a 9c99 screen.
I know what you mean. Have you considered calibrating it at all ? I don't own a calibrator myself but like with the 15" unibody several posters uploaded their color profiles and that drastically improved my previous 15" Unibody. The 9c98 screen is gorgeous, I feel that it is bright enough but it would be nice to know that it can go brighter, and like you said it's just a little on the blue side, but that can easily be fixed.
NStocks
System Preferences > Displays > Color > Open Profile > Click on 13
...but the screen flickers. It stops when I have 3 bars up for brightness plugged in and 4 bars running battery.