Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No way I'm going to read through to see if somebody already addressed this, but the different cell radios in each phone account for something here. Absolutely one will run hotter than the other. And even regardless of which radio you have, gsm or cdma, these tests should be performed with the radio turned off for apples to apples.
Power usage would also be contingent on (among other things) tower proximity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgelin
The Samsung-made A9s are going to start flashing subliminal messages to buy Galaxy S6s and Samsung TVs, hence the lower battery power. It makes perfect sense.
 
You should add another option to the poll...

"I prefer to bypass all the reactionary misinformation, and am going to wait until there are more controlled tests, instead of relying on FUD based "reports" from multiple clickbaiting blogs, all referencing the exact same unscientific tests performed on exactly 2 phones (out of 13 million) by a random kid on Reddit, who had a SIM card in one phone but not the other."
 
Had a Samsung chip in the AT&T 64GB 6S. No issues with the phone beyond not being happy with battery life (not necessarily blaming the chip for poor battery performance, though). Returned the 6S today and replaced it with a T-Mobile 128GB 6S+ for better battery life. It's TSMC.
 
Had a Samsung chip in the AT&T 64GB 6S. No issues with the phone beyond not being happy with battery life (not necessarily blaming the chip for poor battery performance, though). Returned the 6S today and replaced it with a T-Mobile 128GB 6S+ for better battery life. It's TSMC.
Annnd, and? Better battery life, huh? :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poontaco
Ok well sorry for not telling the full story:

-Bought phone full price on preorder at Apple.com
-You can return it within 14 days without any reason

After returning the phone I told the employee I wanted another one with the same specs, she looked at me like "ok..." so I told her the story (#chipgate), she didn't seem interested at all but I got my replacement right away...

Credit went back again to my CC, employee said it might take 5 days but everything went smooth.

Once I got home and crossed my fingers I found out I got a brand new TSMC iPhone :D #WIN

That's it.

That's crazy . If I would of gone to my Apple Store , and tell them your story they probably would laugh at me,because most of the employees in the store there know me there. I would actually be embarrassed lol. I had the Samsung chip on my iPhone 6s Plus. I went the Apple Store today to downgrade to the 6s because of comfort not because a chip. My iPhone ran smooth with no issues with the Samsung chip. Came home and just for curiosity I checked and my iPhone had the TSMC. Both chips run the same in my opinion. No lag no Bs. I believe people are blowing this topic out of proportion. Just my two cents.


Edit: Yeah,apparently is not the lag were talking about here hehehe. (I feel stupid)

Anyways ..... Austin (youtuber) posted this interesting video. I guess there's is a difference.


 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iAstonish
I really wish they wouldn't label it 'good or bad', there's far too little information still to call one good and one bad, and even then those terms are far too absolute.

But then how would they get all the clicks? Make no mistake, anything that even hints at a problem with an Apple product is a goldmine for the blogs.
 
Of course the Samsung chip is better in every way. Hasn't this always been the case with apple products? 2 suppliers, one is Samsung (the champ) and one is the loser. I would return it for the Samsung chip. Its the better, faster more efficient of the two. If you went to the store and bought a computer expecting an intel chip inside and came home and found out it was the cheaper AMD would you keep it?

Samsung chip is 10% smaller, so 10% more power efficient, 10% faster and just 10% better. Since this is the case the TSMC chipped phones should be 10% cheaper.

Oh boy. Gonna be a lawsuit. Looks like the Samsung chip being 10% more efficient is going to get and extra hour or so of battery life and be a little quicker. We need to figure out how to identify the chip based on the info on the box so we can cherry pick the good ones from the bad crappy ones.


http://9to5mac.com/2015/09/28/a9-samsung-tsmc-speed/

If in the next 15 pages the tide turns against TSMC , this guy is going to be doing cartwheels in this thread
 
I checked and my iPhone had the TSMC. Both chips run the same in my opinion. No lag no Bs. I believe people are blowing this topic out of proportion. Just my two cents.

Perfect example of how crowd mentality overtakes reason and things escalate in about twenty seconds to a ridiculous place; because people don't even bother reading. The discussion about the chips is not about lag. It's about battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SR71 and jlevy73
Perfect example of how crowd mentality overtakes reason and things escalate in about twenty seconds to a ridiculous place; because people don't even bother reading. The discussion about the chips is not about lag. It's about battery life.

Well said. There is no discernible difference in processing speeds between the two chips. The only issues now is the anomaly in the geekbench battery bench which shows TMSC with a 20% advantage.
 
I actually got my phone replaced because the battery was horrible. It had the TSMC. My replacement has a Samsung and the battery life is a little better. Not as good as my iPhone 6.
 
Run Antutu 3 times in a row. That's what I got on my first run but second and third runs were higher.

Thanks. Second test got this.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    379.5 KB · Views: 193
  • Like
Reactions: jlevy73
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.