Can they put the “traffic lights” on their own glass pill and bump the sidebar down a little
Apple has truly lost its marbles.My lord, this is painfully bad in so many ways
![]()
What is that black stuff gathering at the top like burnt roasted marshmallows?
It took me a minute to realize what I am looking at. That black shade appears to be an indication that there is stuff "above" that is out of view because the "pane" has been scrolled down.Your guess is as good as mine.
It took me a minute to realize what I am looking at.
"we need to extend your content into the toolbar area so you can see more of your content....Your guess is as good as mine.
This is rough
Taste is subjective, of course, and there is no right or wrong answer here, but care to share what it is about the Tahoe version that you like over Sequoia, and by a long-shot?I prefer Tahoe to Sequoia. By a longshot.
I mean, it’s still headed by “lets just hide everything behind gestures” Alan Dye … the guy designs pretty UIs with hard to discover tools and functions.It's remarkably "incorrect" to have the stoplight icon cluster on a floating window.
That gives the understandable impression that the close button (red), for instance, would close the floating sidebar it's within, as opposed to the entire window.
This design is so bad -- on so many levels.
They have people doing this who are totally inept as actual interface designers.
![]()
I like it because it is the first major redesign of MacOS in years. I like the Liquid glass display since it reminds me a lot of Windows 7.Taste is subjective, of course, and there is no right or wrong answer here, but care to share what it is about the Tahoe version that you like over Sequoia, and by a long-shot?
At this point, Sequoia; but if they refine Tahoe to scale down the size of the UI elements and apply a lighter weight to the text in the sidebar, I think Tahoe may take the win. I am a big fan of Sequoia which is one reason I’ve held off on installing the 26 beta - I feel like they really got the OS to a good place design-wise so I’m very hesitant on Tahoe.
A user on Mastodon mocked up a better alternative to what Apple has put forth thus far in the beta.
Thoughts?
I think it's much better.
![]()
...and at the same time, pointless. As good as it looks, this won't sway Apple.far superior
God! Much, much better!!A user on Mastodon mocked up a better alternative to what Apple has put forth thus far in the beta.
Thoughts?
I think it's much better.
![]()
Honestly this really clarifies something for me. The floating button approach maybe can be argued for smaller phone phone screens. But when you have a larger window the visual hierarchy just doesn’t make sense without a consistent bar like this. Everything just turns into noise otherwise.A user on Mastodon mocked up a better alternative to what Apple has put forth thus far in the beta.
Thoughts?
I think it's much better.
![]()
That screenshot is really sad to look at. Just about everything is a step backwards in terms of usability and, dare I say, taste.Honestly this really clarifies something for me. The floating button approach maybe can be argued for smaller phone phone screens. But when you have a larger window the visual hierarchy just doesn’t make sense without a consistent bar like this. Everything just turns into noise otherwise.
Regarding the menu bar: while I can understand what you say with your last sentence, and having a sleek glass bar with the new glass optical distortion effect could be cool… when I imagine a magnifying glass just like the one we have on the Liquid Glass sliders, sliding across the menu… Frankly, I’m quite happy they left the menu bar as minimalistic as possible.The menu bar leaves me speechless. If they're taking a 'glass' approach to their UI, then surely the Sequoia menu bar is closer to this vision since it is quite literally a diffused bar behind the menu items? No background on the menu bar does absolutely nothing to improve productivity, since I'm one of those users that keeps windows below it?
Okay, who’s going to be the first to send this concept to the Cupertino design team?A user on Mastodon mocked up a better alternative to what Apple has put forth thus far in the beta.
Thoughts?
I think it's much better.
![]()
I do agree that caution is the best strategy, but it just seems that they (Apple) would rather go for a uniform approach across all platforms rather than considering how users interact with their devices.Regarding the menu bar: while I can understand what you say with your last sentence, and having a sleek glass bar with the new glass optical distortion effect could be cool… when I imagine a magnifying glass just like the one we have on the Liquid Glass sliders, sliding across the menu… Frankly, I’m quite happy they left the menu bar as minimalistic as possible.
I mean, I’m starting to dislike all this exaggerated liquid glass effects, especially on sliders, and I haven’t even tried the beta. I feel everything is… a bit too much. And while I’m all for the new glass texture, I’d rather keep the UI as minimal and, why not, as flat as possible. That doesn’t mean having a bit of prominence, less flat that what we had until now. But… with caution.
Yes the funny thing is they where like “transparent menu bar makes the screen seem bigger”.I think the big issue at play is that they have prioritised 'consistency' with interfaces rather than the input methods of each interface.
This is so obviously not a pointer interface it's baffling, and proves that TC has no backbone whatsoever when it comes to making big decisions.