ChemicalGeoff said:Surely the core will provide it's own power?
I'm sure you can get away with a cheap unpowered hub.
No I've never worked for Framatome, however I know that there are or have designed this side of the system. I believe there still calling it Framatome ANP here in the U.S. I don't believe there called Areva at least not yet. I checked on their website and it says it is a "An AREVA and Siemens Company." Currently I'm getting my MS in nuclear eng and have a BS already in it. I've mainly worked more on the health physics side. I don't particularly like Framatome because the bastards never called me back or any of my classmates back for an interview.... I personally would like to work for Duke Energy...MacHarne said:Nuc, do you work at one of those locations? I interned at Framatome ANP for several years - was a very nice experience. Now, though, I believe they are Areva or another version of the Framatome-Areva name combination, yet still the same company. I wish they could go ahead and choose a name to stick with for a few decades. In the past 10 years, I think they have changed names five or six times.
What else is there to do with the North? Best thing for it, really.dr bognus said:yes we cordoned off north england
Dr Bognus
Nickygoat said:What else is there to do with the North? Best thing for it, really.
homerjward said:agreed. do you really want to control a nuclear power plant with a $500 consumer computer? note to self: dont ever go near sellafield!
Nuc said:This is the last place you need to be looking for advice about nuclear systems.... Changing out the computer (new or old) is a huge undertaking for one person to do, either your yanking our chain or your getting yours yanked. Even for a small test reactor here in the US it is a large undertaking, and it would be overseen by the NRC and also supporting companies. I'm currently getting my MS in nuclear engineering and my friend who works at a power plant says that this is a multimillion dollar undertaking, and even then it has to be approved by the NRC... So no $500 dollar computer will solve your problem.
You really need to contact other companies that are currently doing this. I would first look at Framatome, Westinghouse, GE, etc. Ask them what they recommend. From there you should be able to get a good idea. Best of luck.
mkrishnan it's nice to know there is another NE on this forum.
ChemicalGeoff said:It's true, the only thing worse than chavs is chavs with super powers!
punkbass25 said:basicly if you need it to not crash, because peoples lives could be endangered, look elsewhere.
mkrishnan said:True that. I continue to recommend Windows ME. Someone mentioned that the Packard Bell is an ideal platform to provide optimal stability under ME, and I wholeheartedly agree with that too.
_pb_boi said:Don't forget the pretty stock images Windows ME offers for your background. Always important in a nuclear setting!
geese said:All the important bits- you know the bits that glow in the dark and go up and down in some kind of 'reactor'.
Although I've just worked out that with there being 4 reactor cores, I'll need 4 USB ports to connect to each reactor. Do you reckon I'll need a powered USB hub?
_pb_boi said:Don't forget the pretty stock images Windows ME offers for your background. Always important in a nuclear setting!
I think the mini would be fine; I'd leave the RAM at 256, plenty of room to spare for all your nuclear reactor-ing needs. Hook it up to a sweet 13in CRT (VGA, naturally - the adaptor's included!) and you're all set. As for software, I think wwwdoteverything-for-your-newklear-reactordotcom are running specials - 2 for 1's and such. That way, if Sellafield blows again, you haven't really lost out, have you?
And hey - you can thank me later.
andy.
Oh, and - you gotta LOVE this picture
Edit: Just read the website in its entirety - still crying with laughter![]()
ChemicalGeoff said:You sure about this? I always thought beta particles could be absorbed by the body (with plenty ill effects).
Gamma rays, though, are a different story.