I am just wanting to use this poll to help settle a workplace debate...
For those asking: two Canadian actors. Mr. Reynolds is from my hometown of Vancouver and is by all accounts a very nice guy in real life. I don't recall having watched Mr. Gosling in anything, but Ryna Reynolds has been in a couple of "superhero" films (Green Arrow and Deadpool the latter which was rather successful) , which I know are not really to most tastes hence why the queries.
Hey I was thinking of starting a "sci-fi babes" thread to say who is the hottest space chick !*I don't think I've heard anybody ask a question like this since about second grade.
I don't think I've heard anybody ask a question like this since about second grade.
Yes.
The question as posed is hideously reminiscent of the vacuous - and exceedingly boring - conversations that filled the classroom at break time on schooldays.
I am not sure that the internet is the place to seek answers to superficial questions of what is deemed 'attractive' as such things are also determined by age, culture, and where one is from - in social terms , class terms, geographical terms, fashion terms - possibly ethnic criteria.......this is not something that is static.
OP, you should have included pics.
This sounds way to logical.
But... I'm not in the habit of judging relative male handsomeness, but say they are too close based on facial appearance alone to make a call.
![]()
![]()
Thank you, @Huntn.
Perhaps I am being too "logical", but, while 'logic' doesn't always dictate what one finds attractive, cultural conditioning often has more say in what one is allowed to - or encouraged to - deem attractive than one might wish to admit.
Having said that, neither appeal; both are too "American" to my jaundiced eyes - a look that - candidly - leaves me cold; besides, their eyes are too closely set together - that is a very American feature, and - moreover - I cannot see how one would make much of a distinction between them.
Same stupid haircut and awfully similar facial features. Meh.OP, you should have included pics.
This sounds way to logical.
But... I'm not in the habit of judging relative male handsomeness, but say they are too close based on facial appearance alone to make a call.
![]()
![]()
Same stupid haircut and awfully similar facial features. Meh.
So you would take both?Notice, I did not make a pick.![]()
Ha! Well played.So you would take both?![]()
Is said debate an official portion of workplace duties? That said, is beauty not in the eyes of the beholder? Physical appearance often means little where the value of a human being is concerned.I am just wanting to use this poll to help settle a workplace debate...
So you would take both?![]()
Neither are my taste in men, but I voted Reynolds.
Clean up in isle 3.No, not either. If I was to pick the best looking actor of all time, it might be Paul Newman, Robert Redford, or Cary Grant, but there is the pretty boy vs the rugged hansom, they they were too pretty. Rugged might be Steve McQueen, Clint Eastwood, Marlin Brando, Richard Burton or a bunch more... hah.
Personally it is the cookie cutter Hollywood "type" similarity that I find boring.Don't get yourself into trouble.On a beauty scale, I'd never discount someone's attractiveness because they are too English. I think the question was about about physical attractiveness, not personality, habits, or accents.
For myself, physical attributes are just one part of a person's attractiveness, always trumped by personality. And all we really have to go on with actors, if they are not making buffoons of themselves in their personal lives, is their onscreen personalities, which might be accurate to some degree, but more times than not leads you astray if you are trying to figure out what kind of person this actor really is.![]()