Apple's competition in the 15" space starts with 16GB ram & 512 GB SSDs standard at far lesser prices.
The value proposition is interesting to ponder.
15" MacBook Air
M2 with 10-core GPU
8GB RAM
512GB SSD
$1,699
Upgrade to a model with 16GB RAM:
$1,899
Would that work for people?
I'd like to see that backed up by hard data. You could be comparing to much lower-tiered products.Apple's competition in the 15" space starts with 16GB ram & 512 GB SSDs standard at far lesser prices.
My apologies. I overstated this.I'd like to see that backed up by hard data. You could be comparing to much lower-tiered products.
If you want to make a solid comparison, you should first find a 15" model with comparable performance (Geekbench 6 SC, MC, and Open CL scores), battery life, and display*, and then cost it out with 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB SSD. *For the display, you'd want to find comparable quality and resolution (≈220 ppi => ≈2900 x 1900) to what would be expected for a 15.5" Air.
Actually, that XPS-15, with its RTX3050, offers about double the graphics power of the M2. However, its i7-12700H CPU is less performant. A better comparison would be the i7-13700H, which is a bit slower SC and a bit faster MC than the M2. And the Dell's HD display isn't as good.None of these are in the same league as far as performance goes, especially graphics, nor in many cases screen resolution. However, what are the tradeoffs consumers make?
And none of them have Messages - so I'm out.Actually, that XPS-15, with its RTX3050, offers about double the graphics power of the M2. However, its i7-12700H CPU is less performant. A better comparison would be the i7-13700H, which is a bit slower SC and a bit faster MC than the M2. And the Dell's HD display isn't as good.
Looking at the big picture, if the 15.5-inch MacBook were simply a puffed up M2 MBA, it wouldn't take Apple so long (9 to 12 months after MBA) to launch it. Rather, that's the time it takes to design a new cooling system and chassis. I don't expect 15.5-inch to come with a full heatsink/fan like MBP, but rather something close to Intel-based MBA.
The poll results aren't surprising because most people visiting this forum already have an Apple Silicon mac. Why would they vote for anything other than "no"?I'm very surprised by the poll results. I thought the 15" MB(A) was a much desired config. Does nothing for me, but I thought there was a ton of pent up demand for a machine of this size/specs.
If anything, a 15" model would fit into the MacBook Air line instead of the Pro. With a 13", 14" and 16" Pro already in the market, there is no logical reason to shoehorn a 15" model into that lineup. With the Air product line though, there has been a groundswell of support for a 15" model for a while now.
This is what makes me believe a 15" MacBook with an M2 Pro is not going to be branded an air. If Ming-Chi Kuo didn't bring up this possibility I'd be solidly in the 15" MacBook Air camp. Since he has been right on occasion in the past, it's clouded my view. What's also clouded my opinion is that this 15" MacBook would sit above the 13" MacBook Pro in the pricing. That's awkward.How confusing would it be to have a 15-inch MacBook Air with an M2 Pro chip, and a 13-inch MacBook Pro with an M2 chip? I really hope Apple doesn't do that. Give the 15-inch an M2 and price it aggressively enough that it does not step on the toes of the 14-inch MBP. It is not that difficult!
And "MacBook Air" in particular probably has a huge amount of goodwill still attached to it from the heyday of the 2010-2017 model. No amount of marketing could replicate such a reputation.I think they decided (probably based on some market research) that people like the names with modifiers. “MacBook Air” sounds more special than “MacBook,” even though these days the Air is the entry level laptop.
It is, but functionally the AS Air is much more like the Intel Air than the Intel MacBook, since the MacBook was a low-powered (some would say underpowered) budget model, while the AS Air has quite a bit of performance. I.e., the AS Air doesn't fit into the Macbook product category.I think they decided (probably based on some market research) that people like the names with modifiers. “MacBook Air” sounds more special than “MacBook,” even though these days the Air is the entry level laptop.
Yeah, the Air's "brand recognition" is extraordinarily valuable, and it wouldn't make sense to give up. It would be kind of like GM retiring the Corvette name, or Hermes retiring the Birkin Bag.I think they decided (probably based on some market research) that people like the names with modifiers. “MacBook Air” sounds more special than “MacBook,” even though these days the Air is the entry level laptop.
We know 13.6-inch Air can fit an M2 logic board, so a 15.5-inch will have plenty of space. Without adding a fan, what would Apple do with the extra space adjacent to the logic board? Insert a plastic space filler?
With a 15" M2 Air, they could increase the battery size. But, since it's an Air, they'll probably want to keep the battery size close to the 52.6 WHr on the 13" M2 Air (maybe just enough bigger to compensate for the extra power draw from the larger display), to keep the weight and cost down. Plus if they keep the battery size down they could make the case even thinner than on the 13" M2 Air (not sure if they'll do that, though). I don't think the battery will be anywhere near to the 100 WHr airplane max.Bigger battery, get as close to the 100wh as possible, or yes as you said insert a plastic space filler.
That's what Apple did with the touchbar and non touchbar versions of 13" MacBook Pros. The touchbar version had 2 fans. The non touchbar had only 1 fan. What did they do with the extra space? Bigger battery and plastic spacer around the single fan. Exactly as you said lol.
Edit: they could also use the space to add more ports.
My apologies. I overstated this.
View attachment 2168828
View attachment 2168829
View attachment 2168830
None of these are in the same league as far as performance goes, especially graphics, nor in many cases screen resolution. However, what are the tradeoffs consumers make?