Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


Apple's first foldable iPhone, rumored for release next year, may turn out to be smaller than most people imagine, if a recent report is anything to go by. According to The Information, the outer display on the book-style device will measure just 5.3 inches – that's smaller than the 5.4-inch screen on the ‌iPhone‌ mini, a line Apple discontinued in 2022 due to poor sales. The report has led some people to wonder why Apple would settle on such a compact form factor.

iPhone-Fold-Vertical-Feature.jpg

Using The Information's reported dimensions, content creator Ben Geskin has shared some images and video of a printed version of the device (embedded below) that help envision what it could look and feel like in the hand. They also hint at Apple's design strategy, suggesting it is related to an unavoidable trade-off between the outer and inner displays of a book-style foldable.

A taller, phone-like outer screen generally leads to a more square inner panel once unfolded, which can be awkward for many types of content, like videos and two open windows in Split View. Conversely, a more rectangular inner display that better supports multi-window use inevitably forces the outer display to become wider or smaller, making it less comfortable to hold and less conventional in use.


Reports suggesting Apple has opted for a roughly 4:3 aspect ratio on the inner display strongly suggest Apple is favoring the latter approach. A 4:3 inner display would allow Apple to more easily transfer established multitasking features from iPadOS into a foldable form. Here the unfolded state becomes the main mode of use, prioritizing a lightweight, ultra-portable iPad experience over a stretched-out smartphone.

That said, the ‌iPhone‌ Fold in its closed state is likely to feel more like a smaller everyday phone than other foldables on the market. Compare the rumored 5.3-inch outer screen size with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, which has a 6.5-inch front display, or the Google Pixel Pro Fold, whose cover screen comes in at 6.3 inches. Indeed, the ‌iPhone‌ Fold's front display would be smaller than almost all current major foldables, suggesting Apple is deliberately diverging from the "outer screen as primary phone" philosophy.

When choosing size, Apple will of course have a very deliberate product strategy in mind. While Samsung and Google largely treat the cover display on their foldables as a full-time smartphone screen, Apple may see the device's folded state as a secondary experience, suited to notifications, quick replies, and other glanceable interactions, while reserving the main experience for when the device is unfolded.


However, software too has its limits. If users expect to browse, type extensively, or use third-party apps in the folded state, no amount of interface refinement will fully overcome a physically smaller canvas. That's what makes the comparison to the ‌iPhone‌ mini so notable – especially for a device expected to command a price premium of anywhere between $2,000 and $2,500, which would make it Apple's most expensive ever iPhone.

Ultimately, the rumored dimensions suggest Apple is betting on the value of the unfolded experience rather than the comfort of the folded one. The company seems willing to accept a smaller, less conventional outer display if it ensures the inner display can shine at the system and app level. If users come to think of the device not as a larger iPhone, but as an iPad that happens to fold into a pocket, the design trade-offs start to look far more intentional, and far more Apple-like.

ben-geskin-iphone-fold-mock-up-iphone-pro-max-e1766495091611.jpg

16:9 video playback on 7.7-inch display vs. 6.9-inch iPhone 17 Pro Max display (image credit: @BenGeskin).

What do you think of the alleged dimensions of Apple's rumored foldable iPhone? Let us know in the comments. The "iPhone Fold," which some are calling it, is expected to launch alongside the iPhone 18 Pro models in September 2026.

Article Link: Why Apple's Foldable iPhone May Be Smaller Than Expected
Edit: as was pointed out to me, I was looking at the wrong tables, so ignore my beautiful logic below… 😖

Here’s a detail that gives this rumour credibility:

A 5.3 inches 2:3 screen is 2.94 inches wide.

An iPhone Air is 2.94 inches wide.

In other words, the “fat” design of the folded state is shorter than an iPhone Air, but not wider. It will not be more unwieldy than an iPhone Air.

Have an iPhone Air (or a standard iPhone which is just a few mm narrower)? Use the Reachability feature (slide down at the bottom of the screen) and play around manually width the height, until the format is about 2:3. That will be the size of the folded state. Same width as a normal iPhone, but less tall. Makes total sense.
 
Last edited:
Here’s a detail that gives this rumour credibility:

A 5.3 inches 2:3 screen is 2.94 inches wide.

An iPhone Air is 2.94 inches wide.

In other words, the “fat” design of the folded state is shorter than an iPhone Air, but not wider. It will not be more unwieldy than an iPhone Air.

Have an iPhone Air (or a standard iPhone which is just a few mm narrower)? Use the Reachability feature (slide down at the bottom of the screen) and play around manually width the height, until the format is about 2:3. That will be the size of the folded state. Same width as a normal iPhone, but less tall. Makes total sense.

It will be a bit wider since the Air measurement is including bezels and without any extra space for a hinge on the foldable while the display on the foldable would be 2.94 inches. Adding 9-10 mm for all that should give a “worst case” and means we are talking around 5 mm wider than the Pro Max. Nothing to stress about in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lioness~
It will be a bit wider since the Air measurement is including bezels and without any extra space for a hinge on the foldable while the display on the foldable would be 2.94 inches. Adding 9-10 mm for all that should give a “worst case” and means we are talking around 5 mm wider than the Pro Max. Nothing to stress about in my opinion.
Dang, you are right, I was looking at the wrong table. You just destroyed all my beautiful logic 😄😄
 
  • Like
Reactions: ofarlig
If they made the aspect ratio sqrt(2):1 (≈ 7:5), then the folded and unfolded screens would have the same aspect ratio.

If they did this, then a 5.3" diagonal folded screen would be ≈ 3" x 4.3".
 
This makes me cautiously optimistic. One of my concerns with foldables is that the larger screener on many is too square and thus not really as useful as a tablet screen of the same diagonal measure.

I don’t know why you would spend all the extra on a foldable phone, just to primarily use the outer phone display anyway. The whole benefit of a foldable is that inner screen, so prioritizing that one makes sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
Just give me an iPhone mini that can be opened to double size.

The rumoured format in this article will feel slightly too big to me, I suspect.
But I hope that Apple might sell several options of the iFold and/or iFlip.
 
At that aspect ratio unfolded this is not usable. When I heard 5.3 outer screen I was sold but like this no way. Hard pass.
When you say “unfolded”, do you mean outer screen? I would argue the inside screen is “unfolded”, and at iPad Mini size, that is very much usable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ellnicklin
I see many people saying something along the lines of “focusing on the unfolded state is brilliant”… what else would they possibly do??
 
Really can’t wait for this device. Only downside camera wise won’t be as good as pro max but feel will be better for everything else
 
5.3 will be fine due to being very wide
For the hardcore iPhone lover who's never owned a folding phone, this iPhone model may appeal.

Conversely for those who do have folding phone experience this model is far too small and limited in its usefulness.

My Samsung Z Fold7 has educated me as to the potential and productivity possibilities of the folding form factor. Even better will be the larger display area of the upcoming Samsung TriFold I plan to purchase.

Further advancements being created by the eight major manufacturers of folding smartphones are leading the way. It will be interesting to see if Apple can catch up and present a proper competitor.
 
For the hardcore iPhone lover who's never owned a folding phone, this iPhone model may appeal.

Conversely for those who do have folding phone experience this model is far too small and limited in its usefulness.

My Samsung Z Fold7 has educated me as to the potential and productivity possibilities of the folding form factor. Even better will be the larger display area of the upcoming Samsung TriFold I plan to purchase.

Further advancements being created by the eight major manufacturers of folding smartphones are leading the way. It will be interesting to see if Apple can catch up and present a proper competitor.

I have the tri fold and it is great yes

However this form factor will work very well too as while smaller screen being wider should make no shortcomings just means chances are you will need to hold with both hands
 
These will sell great. I think I speak for the majority of people when I say the biggest problem with the current iPhone design is that 1) it doesn't fold enough times, and 2) it doesn't have a giant crease in the middle of the screen.
 
5.3 will be fine due to being very wide
I think you misunderstood my position. It’s unusable because it’s so damn wide. I tried the surface duo. This is the same. The surface duo sucked and for me it was entirely because of the wide size. I want an iPhone mini folded, and a double iPhone mini unfolded. Easy one handed phone with larger screen unfolded.
 
Keeping my jingle in my pocket instead of Apple's pocket.
Enjoy the computing that you accomplish "Keeping my jingle in my pocket instead of Apple's pocket."

Personally I find the rumored iFold interesting and look forward to holding a real device in my hands. And testing its pocketability. My guess is that I will want one, except that it probably will have limited camera capability and therefore fail for my needs.
 
Last edited:
I’ve never been able to use the pro or max models as they’re too wide so this design would be unusable to me. These models account for around 40% of total users so could be a hit for those with bigger hands.
 
I hope the phone won’t have an “ass” like it looks on the mock-ups. Would look and feel terribly unfolded.
 
If it is true that the foldable will have Touch ID instead Face ID, I’m out. Touch ID fails a lot when I used it on iPad mini, it drove me nuts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.