Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People who wanted the watch bought it over a year ago. Now people are waiting for the next Apple Watch.
 
People who wanted the watch bought it over a year ago. Now people are waiting for the next Apple Watch.
do you think that if no new apple watched is announced at the conference next week, there will be a resurgence of apple watch interest?
 
do you think that if no new apple watched is announced at the conference next week, there will be a resurgence of apple watch interest?
No, because the people who are interested in the watch have bought them. Apple cut the price a few months ago which presumably helped drive more sales. There's no further motivation or action (other then another price cut) to see a spike in sales on a watch that is over a year old and people are expecting a new model.
 
The other issue is that unless you happen upon exactly the right buyer, the price floor is really set by the cheapest someone can buy the Sport model, not the SS model, because the vast majority of people looking to buy new are by definition price conscious. This is why iPhones and iPads with anything more than the base storage bring very little extra on the second-hand market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjh
The other issue is that unless you happen upon exactly the right buyer, the price floor is really set by the cheapest someone can buy the Sport model, not the SS model, because the vast majority of people looking to buy new are by definition price conscious. This is why iPhones and iPads with anything more than the base storage bring very little extra on the second-hand market.
yeah, that's a really good point. i'm positive there are some people out there that would find this a bargain, the tricky thing is actually finding them
 
I'm reminded of when I tried to sell my iPad Air 2 earlier this year. It was only a few months old and in perfect condition. I think I ended up with about 50% what I paid for it. There was no interest at all.
 
I'm reminded of when I tried to sell my iPad Air 2 earlier this year. It was only a few months old and in perfect condition. I think I ended up with about 50% what I paid for it. There was no interest at all.
yikes, maybe i should be looking to stay in a hostel instead of a room on airbnb, then
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRxROBOT
I'm reminded of when I tried to sell my iPad Air 2 earlier this year. It was only a few months old and in perfect condition. I think I ended up with about 50% what I paid for it. There was no interest at all.

The iPad Air 2 is, what, two years old? 50% of the original value is about pretty much normal. One-year-old iPhones also sell at 50% of original price. You'd get far less, if not basically nothing, if they weren't Apple products.
 
No, because the people who are interested in the watch have bought them. Apple cut the price a few months ago which presumably helped drive more sales. There's no further motivation or action (other then another price cut) to see a spike in sales on a watch that is over a year old and people are expecting a new model.

Well for most of the world, the Watch is not even 6 months old. Add to the fact that Apple only just started selling the watch in Target and Wal-Mart stores about 6 months ago. Add to that, Apple has recently launched a huge billboard marketing campaign for the watch.

I'm willing to bet very few people in the market for an Watch are actually talking about whether there's a second model coming soon. For many people worldwide, the watch has only recently come into their consciousness.

It seems clear to me that at is point Apple has managed to put the watch in front of most of its potential customers (iPhone owners), and those customers aren't interested -- not because they think there's a new watch due any time now.

That's not to say there won't be a spike when the second gen watch is due, if not just from many of the original watch owners who will jump at the improved experience they are already enthusiastic about. And, there will most definitely be a smaller subset of new customers who have been sitting back to see what the second gen watch brings after liking, but passing on what the original watch offers. But overall, not encouraging for stimulating a lot of growth for Apple, especially at the current retail prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
It seems clear to me that at is point Apple has managed to put the watch in front of most of its potential customers (iPhone owners), and those customers aren't interested -- not because they think there's a new watch due any time now.

That's like saying after one year of the iPad, Apple has managed to put the iPad in front of most of its potential customers and those customers aren't interested. It's a fact that they've sold more AWs after one year compared to the iPad, and it can only go up from there.
 
That's like saying after one year of the iPad, Apple has managed to put the iPad in front of most of its potential customers and those customers aren't interested. It's a fact that they've sold more AWs after one year compared to the iPad, and it can only go up from there.

Sorry, I must have missed the official Apple press release announcing the total number of Watches sold, unlike Steve Jobs specific announcements of iPad numbers shipped during its first year.

Of course in 2010, there were also a lot fewer iPhones in the world (in the hundreds of millions I think).

And last I checked, what goes up must come down. Apple's iPhone sales have gone down for the last quarter year over year. And the iPad has been in decline for years. So clearly, sales can't only go up for an Apple product. In fact there doesn't even seem to be a correlation as to when in a typical product's life cycle they will go down.

So nice try to discredit an opposing viewpoint, but without actual facts, I guess we'll both just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Sorry, I must have missed the official Apple press release announcing the total number of Watches sold, unlike Steve Jobs specific announcements of iPad numbers shipped during its first year.

Of course in 2010, there were also a lot fewer iPhones in the world (in the hundreds of millions I think).

And last I checked, what goes up must come down. Apple's iPhone sales have gone down for the last quarter year over year. And the iPad has been in decline for years. So clearly, sales can't only go up for an Apple product. In fact there doesn't even seem to be a correlation as to when in a typical product's life cycle they will go down.

So nice try to discredit an opposing viewpoint, but without actual facts, I guess we'll both just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.

You know perfectly well we have extrapolated numbers available to us, and they didn't merely pull these out of their butts. Apparently you think a 'flop' sold twice as fast as iPhone in its first year, and you're no different from all the other pundits who unrealistically deem the first generation AW a flop because it didn't sell in as many numbers as the iPhone, which has been around for nearly 10 years.
 
Craiglist in my opinion has become more difficult to sell things on. Takes longer. :(
the only texts i've had from craigslist are people wanting me to send it to their grandma in nigeria, so many fakes. posted it on a local garage sale board on facebook, too, but nada there either
 
that's a good idea actually! thanks for the tip
Do you not know that Apple doesn't allow you to post here? You can get your employment terminated and seeing that your case is very specific I don't think its very hard for Apple to track you down. So are you sure you wanna risk that?

It was the first thing that we were told at the Apple training (I no longer work for Apple so I'm fine :) ).
So, is this thread worth the risk?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.