Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But, there ARE use cases for it. There are times I want a quiet, low volume song playing in the background, not worried about quality. For example, in bed, dosing off into sleep... It would be awesome to have it playing soothing songs until I fall asleep. Just ONE of the several use cases. ;-) R. (PS. Blowing the speaker? Nonsense. 🤣)

Blowing the speaker isn't an issue, I agree; but sound quality would be. What is acceptable in a voice output would not be with music and the you'd have a pretty poor experience. Apple does not want taht as people would complain about the sound of music and not be glad it can even play music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
Thing is I can't wear any type of headphones, ear phones while working inside a distribution center. It's against the policy. Which is why I wanted to be able to listen to it directly from the watch. I already own AirPods.
In a pinch, I've put my iPhone in my shirt pocket upside down and played audio with the speakers pointed up. It's not a great experience, but passable for a podcast or something. And surely a lot better than the audio from an Apple Watch would be, especially coming from your (presumably) moving wrist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
There are hearing aids with bluetooth so they double as wireless ear buds.

Curiously enough, while the sound quality of speech streamed to my ReSound hearing aids is fantastic, the sound quality of music is abysmal. But sound quality when wearing both hearing aids and good-quality over-the-ear headphones is perfect. I’m reasonably (but not absolutely) confident that music would sound better played from the watch than streamed to the hearing aids.

Blowing the speaker isn't an issue, I agree; but sound quality would be. What is acceptable in a voice output would not be with music and the you'd have a pretty poor experience. Apple does not want taht as people would complain about the sound of music and not be glad it can even play music.

Let me argue the other side of the coin. While I’m all for accurate sound reproduction when listening to music … as, yes, a classical musician with an university degree in performance, there are all sorts of cases where a pair of tin cans with string gives you all the sound quality you need. Anybody who would seek out, for example, recordings of Caruso originally sold on wax cylinders (including modern digitizations of the same) will not at all be bothered by the sound quality.

I grew up listing to the Met Opera’s live Saturday matinee radio broadcasts … often on AM … in a ’68 VW Camper, going down the freeway, with the windows down. Or, similarly, in the back seat of a ’55 Bug with the factory-original radio — and don’t forget where the engine is in those cars. Wouldn’t have missed it for the world.

Personally … the ideal for me would be a true seamless experience where any nearby device I’m signed into with iCloud, including the Watch as well as any Bluetooth-connected audio device, is a speaker choice from any other device. As in, yes, I should be able to stream from my MacBook Air to my Watch, or from my iPhone to my iPad. Regardless of how silly it might seem to do so. For example, I might be listening to a live broadcast on the Air, not have my hearing aids in, the phone is charging in another room, and I want to take the garbage out; I should be able to, one-click, hand off the audio to the Watch and not miss a beat.

I’ll also admit that this is a rather low priority for me. I manage to live just fine with the way things are.

b&
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aston441
Let me argue the other side of the coin. While I’m all for accurate sound reproduction when listening to music … as, yes, a classical musician with an university degree in performance, there are all sorts of cases where a pair of tin cans with string gives you all the sound quality you need. Anybody who would seek out, for example, recordings of Caruso originally sold on wax cylinders (including modern digitizations of the same) will not at all be bothered by the sound quality.

I see your point, but most users are going to listen to music that is not that narrow of a niche and expect similar quality to what they get from otehr devices; even If that expectation is unrealistic for a watch. A sa result, the music palyback would be panned and viewed as a negative, and not as one more feature that meets some users' nneeds.

I grew up listing to the Met Opera’s live Saturday matinee radio broadcasts … often on AM … in a ’68 VW Camper, going down the freeway, with the windows down. Or, similarly, in the back seat of a ’55 Bug with the factory-original radio — and don’t forget where the engine is in those cars. Wouldn’t have missed it for the world.

I remember WOWO late at night when they cranked up the power...

Personally … the ideal for me would be a true seamless experience where any nearby device I’m signed into with iCloud, including the Watch as well as any Bluetooth-connected audio device, is a speaker choice from any other device. As in, yes, I should be able to stream from my MacBook Air to my Watch, or from my iPhone to my iPad. Regardless of how silly it might seem to do so. For example, I might be listening to a live broadcast on the Air, not have my hearing aids in, the phone is charging in another room, and I want to take the garbage out; I should be able to, one-click, hand off the audio to the Watch and not miss a beat.

That would be cool, at least Mac-iPhone-iPad-ATV; provided there was a way to prevent it from swapping when you still were near the main device.
 
I would not try that if the iPhone is under a pillow/blanket too long it could superheat and melt down.
If music playback lets the iPhone melt there's something wrong. It's not like you are playing a graphically intense game while charging. My concern would be that the sound quality would be no fun. Just like music on the Watch is no fun. Even HomePod mini should be fine for going-to-sleep music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
One less than ideal method, is the WatchTube app. You can watch any YouTube video and it plays the audio on on the built-in speaker. Used the other day to listen to a lecture. Audio was clear with ample volume. Watch did not overheat. :)
 
Ugh. I really hate responses like this on forums and the like. The original post wasn’t asking how to listen to any media through their Apple Watch, I’m sure they’re not stupid and are perfectly aware you can pair listening devices with it. They specifically asked about listening through the Apple Watch speaker.

And yes, I do realize how ridiculous it is to take the time to post such long thoughts about your 3yo response. But I see this sh*t all the time all over social media and forums, people that just want to pop off some smart*ss reply without taking time to actually consider what the original question was asking. Straw that broke the camels back ya know?

Thaaaanks have a nice day 🙃
Most humans contribute nothing, and actively hinder the ones who do.
 
Amazing people here argue Apple cares about sound quality, when Apple singlehandedly destroyed the wonderful, beautiful quality of sound, that everyone could enjoy, from the early 1970s, until the iPod wiped out all high quality consumer grade sound reproduction equipment practically overnight in the 2000s. And Apple continues to do it! I want my graphic EQ back!
 
BTW, the iPhone and Apple Watch automatically shut down when they get too hot or too cold, I believe.
 
Streamlets is amazing. Just tried it out. I haven't used my AW in years. Streamlets is a reason to start using AW again.

Sounds fantastic on a Series 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G35flyer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.