Seems to me both are 'correct'. Apparent size difference in the first is due to different distances to the camera. Perspective!No...Photo you show I believe is wrong and the correct one is below...
Seems to me both are 'correct'. Apparent size difference in the first is due to different distances to the camera. Perspective!No...Photo you show I believe is wrong and the correct one is below...
Seems to me both are 'correct'. Apparent size difference in the first is due to different distances to the camera. Perspective!
If you do not like what Apple is going to push out next month, or October, then get something else?
They design phones based on a lot of testing and design specs, not on what we want, if this does not fit your liking, go to something else, very simple.
I love the iPhone, however I did look at the S SIII or S Galaxy Note, but all in all when I do the compare charts, I usually stick to the iPhone bc it does work that well, and a bigger screen just makes for a bigger phone and less battery life for me. 4" is better than 3.5" however if I have to sacrifice battery life or it is that much bigger of a phone, I will stick with my 4S, I just can not seem to latch onto Android, just not as polished to ME as an OS, as is with iOS.
No Matter what we say, Apple will produce what they want, and they usually do pretty well going blind at it. If you compare Android to iOS the way it should be, Apple is blowing Android away, but since you have many devices on many versions of Android, hard to compare to 2-3 devices on 1-2 iOS versions, so IMO there is no fair comparison being done here, no matter how you look at it. Everyone I know that has Android has left for an iPhone (doesn't matter which carrier) or complains about lockups, or battery life. I am for now sticking with my 4S, it does what I need very well.
Based on consistent rumors, it seems 95% sure the next iPhone will have a 4" 16:9 screen.
I see what you mean but using my trusty ruler I measure it as ~8.1% of the width of the phone and on my 4S it's ~8.5% (both measured to the outside of the silver ring). Obviously a significant margin of error here, but I'd say they're pretty much the same size.That second photo... the headphone jack looks weird for some reason. Not sure why I think this. Maybe it looks too big? Not sure.
Both are correct, but both are taken such that perspective doesn't help.No...Photo you show I believe is wrong and the correct one is below...
I see what you mean but using my trusty ruler I measure it as ~8.1% of the width of the phone and on my 4S it's ~8.5% (both measured to the outside of the silver ring). Obviously a significant margin of error here, but I'd say they're pretty much the same size.
everyone says that a good reason for elongating the iphone but not making it wider is better because existing apps will be able to be run with black bars on the top and bottom without needing to be updated.
but if they made the iphone longer AND wider, existing apps would still be able to run at the same resolution, just with black bars on all sides.
so I don't see this as a good explanation for why it's not getting wider as well. I'm keeping an open mind to what we get next but to be honest i'm a little skeptical if making it only longer is really the best choice..
Note that the 3gs is slightly wider than the iphone 4, and that was/is perfectly comfortable for the majority and sold very well. There would be room in the next iPhone to increase all dimensions slightly and eliminate the bezel too make the screen considerably wider within tried and tested (and successful) dimensions.
No, I am restating the response that I received to my question. Do you have a point? If it was sarcasm, I missed it.
They set the standards. The 16:9 display could show advantages that apple specifically has.
I am sincerely hoping the proposed iPhone 5 looks nothing like the size of whats floating around out there, that long stretched out design looks so bad. My biggest gripe is screen size on the 4S, and the successor not only needs to be taller but wider as well...