Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. running onenote, which has no equal in OSX
2. the rest of the ms office suite is superior in windows
3. the option to run more games at better fps
4. you can still boot into osx when you want it

Personally, I have a 2010 mbp 15" and I use windows 7 for onenote and boot back to osx as needed. Also, the build quality of macbook pros are 10x better than any pc equivalent. I am also yet to find a keyboard and trackpad on any pc that is remotely as good.
 
p417953420-5.jpg


p782244688.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have a MacBook Air, so I'm not really meant to be in this forum :)

A lot of people seem to install Windows through Parallels/VMware/etc, and I am one of them.

Some people like to look of the MBP, or maybe it's great specifications, but don't like OSX. Some just have to use Windows.

I installed Windows becuase I my productivity levels were somewhat lower, and, some apps I use just don't work well on OS X as they do in Windows.
 
Mostly games for me, I get in the mood to play some Supreme Commander or a few RPGs with no OSX port. Also I play EVE online, and essential apps for it such as EVEmon and EFT are written in .net.
 
Why do I run Windows on a Mac?

1. Visual Studio 2008 & 2010 to write cutting edge business intelligence software. (Both Web Sites & Hard Applications.)
2. SQL Server 2008 R2 (And the only thing wrong with most OSX compatible database platforms is..... everything. I have yet to see MySQL or PostgreSQL do anything Microsoft can't do better.)
3. OneNote (Agree with the above poster. We write different products, and I write on the side as well. OneNote I have every idea already written, and can wire frame a page in a few seconds with links to what pieces of code to use.)
4. Ease of development, and distribution. (Microsoft won the battle of the OS originally because of the level of support they gave developers. Do you use the built in apps of the OS, or other applications like Chrome or FireFox more? Its the developers that make the platform. Apple learned this, and is why the iOS is doing as well as it is.)
5. Games, GalCiv2 is my drug while travelling for these people.
6. Every well designed windows app like notepad++, beyond compare, TortoiseSVN, etc. (I have yet to see a OSX svn client that I didn't want to hit with a rock.)

Just buy a different laptop? Lose out on...

1. The nice trackpad.
2. MagSafe, it has saved my laptop at trade shows.
3. Slot load DVD (What I use of it, I like.)
4. Rubber gasket around the edge of screed to keep dust out.
5. Aluminum case that dissipates heat faster than plastic.
6. Backlit keyboard (Not so much an issue as this is becoming more common)
7. Fewer models > tighter control over product design/quality > more stable hardware selection.

That said, give me a way to choose the graphics card under Window, and to disable the F5, F9, F10, and F11 hotkeys (Sure there is a way, just haven't had the motivation to research it yet.), and I would be a happy camper.

I was interested by SL, but looking at Lion I just feel that OSX is making the wrong strides in the right direction. (Scrolling, Mission Control, Multi-monitor Lackluster support, searching of system directories like trash...)
 
My 15" 2010 Hi-Res Anti-glare 8GB/300GB SSD equipped MBP runs OS X, Windows 7 and Linux. It's very fast, stable, and well optimized.

Using VM's with this configuration, it's a great way to work with the platforms my work requires. I'm very happy with the performance & flexibility.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Alex; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I don't use windows on my Macmini i don't know why idiots do that I mean windows are cheaper
 
Why have two computers? I just use 1. My main OS is Lion and my work OS is Win7. Everything runs great on my MBP with bootcamp. And my reboots only takes about 18-20sec. Less than half a minute away from what I need/want to do.
 
Well, would you rather have a Mac that runs just Mac OS X, or a Mac that runs OS X and Windows 7 (if desired)?

It's just an added perk, if you need it, you got it.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Alex; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I don't use windows on my Macmini i don't know why idiots do that I mean windows are cheaper

Why would I want to substitute Windows with windows?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

I run windows xp in parallels in order to use medical record software. I run parallels in full screen in it's own "space," so to the average person who passes by me when I'm looking at old records, it looks like I'm only using windows. I just use option-arrowkey to bounce back and forth lickity split.
 
Im new to mac so i really dont know that much about it but if you guys have windows on the mac and you can run mac on windows why do you do it the expensive way. Isnt buying a cheaper windows pc an putting mac on it better then buying in expensive mac just to run windows. Alienware is expensive and awesome for gaming and handles programs very well, so why not go that route. Ive always been a pc user and im switching to mac. I still have my pc if i really need to use it for something. I dont know i just dont get it, but like i said im new to mac so maybe there is something im missing and wont know til ive used it for some time.
 
1. running onenote, which has no equal in OSX
2. the rest of the ms office suite is superior in windows
3. the option to run more games at better fps
4. you can still boot into osx when you want it

Personally, I have a 2010 mbp 15" and I use windows 7 for onenote and boot back to osx as needed. Also, the build quality of macbook pros are 10x better than any pc equivalent. I am also yet to find a keyboard and trackpad on any pc that is remotely as good.

I think this poster, and many more, didn't understand the question properly.

The OP meant to run Windows EXCLUSIVELY(which I've see people do).
 
I run windows in Vmware, many people still need to use windows to play games or apps that are not available on OSX.

Win7 is on par to Snow Leopard, in terms of usability, stability and eye candy. If a person opts to use windows exclusively on a mac, why not.
 
I run Win 7 under VMware on my 2010 13" MBP primarily because:
(1) Office 2011 for Mac is incompatible with some Word templates I need to use at work
(2) I need certain Windows applications for remote access to work

If it were possible to overcome the Office incompatibilities, I would target 100% OS X usage. I recently moved from a EeePC to a MBP because of poor reliability on the EeePC. The benefits of OS X are a nice drag-along from the move.
 
Last edited:
Im new to mac so i really dont know that much about it but if you guys have windows on the mac and you can run mac on windows why do you do it the expensive way. Isnt buying a cheaper windows pc an putting mac on it better then buying in expensive mac just to run windows. Alienware is expensive and awesome for gaming and handles programs very well, so why not go that route. Ive always been a pc user and im switching to mac. I still have my pc if i really need to use it for something. I dont know i just dont get it, but like i said im new to mac so maybe there is something im missing and wont know til ive used it for some time.
It has nothing to do with being new to Mac it is also about how much to you know about Technology and consumers.
First there are a couple different groups who buy Macs.
Fashion victims - They no **** about technology, but think it makes them look cool
Fanboys - There are those that know they are a bit crazy and the dumb ones.
These two groups buy it first because of brand.

Next there are people who buy it for professional reasons. That is the old group who often work somewhere where Macs have always been used.
And there are also those that simply don't shy away from OSX and buy MBPs because they are in some respects better than Windows Notebooks.
There are few Windows Notebooks with a screen with decent contrast ratio, colors and brigthness. Dell XPS 15 is one and the good screen is a 200€ upgrade on a notebook that starts at 500 something. With a matte screen there is even less choice and you usually are well past 1000€ till you find one. Try getting your hands on a Notebook that is as slim and fast with Windows is not easy and they are often not that cheap. To cut it short really good Windows Notebooks aren't that much cheaper than a MBP. And since you mention Alienware, they are for kids or teenagers who lack any taste at all. You can carry a Dell Latitude or a Lenovo to a business meeting but with an Alienware you might have problems to be taken seriously (unless you work in certain industries). If you are a gamer you probably shouldn't buy a MBP in the first place. It works for some games every once in a while but you certainly pay too much for too little if you play games often.

I personally think Windows 7 is the better OS. It is faster, needs a lot less RAM to work well, supports new technology better and is also more stable if set up correctly especially considering on how many different machines it is run one really cannot compare it to OSX which manages to run on one system good. Most importantly not just Games run better, many programs are great in Windows but the OSX versions are nothing but cheap ports. The problem is the OSX GUI is in many respects better especially in combination with the touchpad and bettertouchtool. I also much prefer the Terminal and the whole Unix system for programming. It is like Linux with less battery issues.
I use Windows for gaming and any work that doesn't work well on OSX, but most of the time (95%) I use OSX.
If you read through most post you will see that they actually said they use Windows only next to OSX but still spend most time in OSX. There is a difference. For some stuff though it isn't worth the hassle to do it in OSX.
 
I have Windows 7 on this laptop to run Sony Vegas, since there is no Mac version, and I have no experience with FCP or Adobe Premiere. I know there is iMovie, but there are some tasks iMovie can't do. I also put Windows for some programs I may run in the future that are Windows-only or run better on Windows 7 than OSX.

I believe some people buy Macs to put Windows because the Mac hardware (I don't know any other computer brand that has a trackpad as good as the MacBook Pro's) and build quality is very high, and also the Apple technical support.

I love both Windows 7 and Mac OS X equally, they both have their advantages and flaws.
 
Windows 7 runs perfectly on my 2010 MBP.
In fact it seems to run better than Lion.

I LOL when I read this and then thought "You know, he's right!".

Please Apple, Lion needs some patches...


Fanbois to downgrade this post in 3...2...1...

-P
 
Here is my 2 cents:

My MBP/OS X always reminds me of some sort of exotic car that when it runs, it runs very well. However, if you have a minor problem then its a big, big deal.


Windows has improved a great deal from Windows XP (no SP) to Windows 7 (SP1). I find Windows is a lot more crash resistant than OS X. When an errant program goes awry in OS X you can have a major problems.

Lion is especially bad about this.


Let me give you some great examples of this:

Windows has the ability to endure a Control-Alt-Delete through just about anything. You then can switch to Task Manager and end the rogue program.

OS X and its puny Interrupt Keys only work about 80% of the time. The big one from me is when a core service goes bad. If the "WindowServer" has a problem the best you can hope for is to either hold down the PB or ssh into your machine.

I'm not saying OS X does this all the time but when it does happen it's very hard to recover. I would like to have a bullet proof way to bring up a task manager and kill an errant program.

However, OS X is more powerful out of the box. The fantastic set of Unix tools available to me is just splendid. I will some times for get and in Windows try to ssh or whois or something basic and those programs aren't there out of the box (though you can DL them from 3rd party sources).

I also think Finder is really far behind Windows Explorer. Things I hate about Finder:

-I actually use inverse selection in Windows and I wish Finder had this.

-I wish the whole Copy/Replace dialog boxes were much more informative. Windows will tell you a lot about the files (date, size, etc) so you can make a better decision. Finder's dialog box looks like a hack.

-Why can't I assign different views in Finder to different folders?

-Finder tends to 'forget' about window settings.

-I wish I could right click an icon and select rename. The current way is clumsy.

I could go on...


I do like OS X but Windows has caught up and is a good competitor to OS X.

-P
 
I spend 90% of my time in OSX but I definitely have a couple programs that are not made for Mac so instead of going without them I just installed Win7 in a 64GB partition under bootcamp.

Problem solved and everyone's happy. :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.