RE: Why do people hate the mighty mouse?
"Ergonomics"
Exactly right.
Apple hasn't offered a decent mouse _or_ keyboard since back in the "ADB days".
Rather, their typing and pointing products seem to be designed more for style than for substance.
Granted, one of Apple's prime selling points over other PC's has been Apple's attention to style in addition to function. That's ok for the CPU and/or monitor (as in the case of the all-in-one iMacs), but that design philosophy stumbles where _direct_ user input is involved (i.e., hands on mouse or keyboard). At that point, ANYthing that overrides basic ergonomic function will detract from the user experience.
How many folks remember the first iMac mouse (the round "hockey puck")? Or some of the keyboards they've offered in the last 6-7 years?
A PC-using friend just got a new iMac a few months' back. He _immediately_ had trouble trying to make the Mighty Mouse work, vis-a-vis a typical Windows 2-button mouse with scroll wheel. The flat aluminum keyboard isn't working out with him so well, either - nor does it for me. As someone who learned to type on manual typewriters in the 1960's, and then moved on to teletype terminals in the Army, I need a _real_ keyboard with contoured keys and real feedback to "feel what I'm doing". When I try to type on the Apple aluminum keyboard, my fingers "get lost" quickly.
I guess that's why I wouldn't use one. Since I moved up to a PowerMac g4 in 2004, and then to an Intel iMac in 2007, I've never used the Apple mice. And I used the iMac keyboard (the white one) as long as I could stand it, and then replaced it with a MacAlly "IceKey" which is considerably better.
These days, I use a Logitech MX-610 mouse for the g4, and a Microsoft "Blue" mouse for the iMac. The Logitech mouse in particular is miles ahead of ANY product that Apple has EVER sold.
But again, Apple has to keep proving how much "style" they can offer us. When will the folks in Cupertino finally begin to understand that - insofar as pointing and typing are concerned - style means next to nothing? And that "function" is the most important word of all?
- John