iPhone XR Why Face ID flood illuminator working all the time?

[BugeyeSTI]

Please read my reply again if you want. I raised no concern about the FaceID. My concern was about his flawed logic.

BTW your advice is same for you. If you don’t like what I have to say you can ignore me. There is a button for that.

I don’t believe in ignoring people. Everyone has a right to be heard..,

 

[537635]

I bet you there were experts, with various degrees, that would assure you that VW cars emmissions are well within limits.

There are cases where radiation treatment machines would deliver deadly doses of radiation. Again, if you asked expert opinion they would tell you they were perfectly safe.

I am not saying that something similar is happening here. Just that you cannot use it as an argument to assert truth.

There is flawed logic and there is just lack of knowledge or just plain ignorance. I believe you fall in the former two categories.

No oncology expert would ever say that radiation treatment machines are safe. They are not. They (should) deliver just the right amount of radiation to kill the cancer and not healthy organs. You are making an argument about a topic, which is completely unrelated. Radiation machines are gamma rays, this is infrared. The logic "radiation is radiation" is simply flawed.

Again, we are talking about radiation levels so low (think about it... it runs from a small battery) that it represents a negligible amount of IR radiation absorbed during the day. I would argue that cooking breakfast on a stove (not induction) gives you a thousand times larger dose.

 

[stafil]

There is flawed logic and there is just lack of knowledge or just plain ignorance. I believe you fall in the former two categories.

No oncology expert would ever say that radiation treatment machines are safe. They are not. They (should) deliver just the right amount of radiation to kill the cancer and not healthy organs. You are making an argument about a topic, which is completely unrelated. Radiation machines are gamma rays, this is infrared. The logic "radiation is radiation" is simply flawed.

Again, we are talking about radiation levels so low (think about it... it runs from a small battery) that it represents a negligible amount of IR radiation absorbed during the day. I would argue that cooking breakfast on a stove (not induction) gives you a thousand times larger dose.

Did you really not understand a word of what I said?

You know which category you fall into? Failing basic primary school reading comprehension and high school logic.

I didn’t compare IR to radiation any more than I compared it to a car.....

You too are failing to follow simple logic predicates.

Somebody mentioned that given (A) is true, (B) must be true

I gave examples where (A) was true, but (B) wasn’t.

Hence you cannot assert that (B) is true just because (A) is true.

 

[Suckfest 9001]

You are failing to follow simple logic predicates.

Somebody mentioned that given (A) is true, (B) must be true

I gave examples where (A) was true, but (B) wasn’t.

Hence you cannot assert that (B) is true just because (A) is true.

Logic 101.

Then you throw big words “science” and “research” with no context hoping to establish what?

Finally you resort to some kind of mocking? Again not sure what you think you are doing other than proving you don’t want people to take you seriously.

- your reply had nothing to do with any of the points I made
- this isn't philosophy 1000, science and research has nothing to do with your modus ponens expertise
- science and research aren't big words for most people
- I resorted to mockery because that's all your reply was worth lmao

Good day champ