Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have Chrome, but won't give it a serious dedicated test drive until 1Password and Xmarks works with it.

I do like what I've seen so far, though.

I may still end up with Safari, as I really value some of the little features, like Snap Back.

Minutes until it becomes usable. I am considering more ram, but a browser shouldn't use that much.

Are you starting up in Top Sites, by any chance?

If so, depending on your Internet connection speed and how many Top Sites you're showing, that could be the problem. Safari has to go out and get data from a lot of different sites.
 
Hey what's that app?

iStat Menus

Woof, Woof - Dawg
pawprint.gif
 
You all realize that Google Chrome is built on Webkit like Safari... I know there are slight differences since they both use a slightly different version of Webkit, and obviously the other aspects of the browser are different. I just saw a few posts referring to Safari as Webkit, when in fact they are both based on Webkit.
 
I love Chrome. I also love Safari. Neither is perfect.

It bothers me that Safari can't restore the group of tabs I had open before I last quit it. I know there's an option to restore all open windows from, I believe, the History menu item, but that's a manual step I'd rather not have to do every time. So I use Saft with Safari.. only with Saft does Safari even become an actual browser choice for me. This is really my biggest gripe with Safari. Otherwise I love its stability, speed, clean looks and reliability.

I love a variety of things about Chrome, but an important one certainly is speed. It launches quickly, it surfs quickly and it's got an extremely simple/uncluttered UI. It's a really easy browser to recommend to less tech savvy friends, precisely because of its simple, friendly UI (the blue and the way tabs are displayed looks great and intuitive as well) and fast performance.

The main reason I can't stick with just one of them is add-on support. I can't use Speed Download with Chrome. Or 1Password. Because of those, I'm "stuck" with Safari. It's the single reason I couldn't, say, just use Chrome for a week while ignoring Safari completely. And that's way it'll be until that changes.

Bottom line is that there is a lot to love about them both, but for reasons stated above, Safari will remain my default browser for the foreseeable future.
 
Again, something is definitely wrong here.

Yeah, tell me about it. I can open Safari damn near instantly and use it all day long on my pathetic little Macbook Air with only a measly 2 gigs of ram.

You all realize that Google Chrome is built on Webkit like Safari... I know there are slight differences since they both use a slightly different version of Webkit, and obviously the other aspects of the browser are different. I just saw a few posts referring to Safari as Webkit, when in fact they are both based on Webkit.

There is no room for facts here. Move along.
 
ClickToFlash. That's what will keep me with Safari. I can't really use my MB w/o a flash blocker.

Really disappointed with Chrome. Granted, I only have 1 gig of ram, but my fans would actually kick on while just browsing. It has never done this with Safari or Firefox. The scrolling was really choppy as well.
 
I tried the dev version of Google Chrome and I really like it. It opens on one bounce (sometimes even less), which is about the same as my Safari, so I'd give them a tie on this aspect.

Interface - I find Chrome's interface neat and perhaps even nicer than Safari's. I don't mind the tabs on top, BUT having them on top will prevent you from seeing the "title" of the website you are browsing. I don't know, perhaps I would get used to it eventually, but I like it when there is a name of whatever topic/site I'm browsing on top of the browser.

In Chrome, you gain more viewing space without the Status Bar below (yes, I know you can hide it in Safari too, but then you won't ever see what link you're about to click etc.) - kudos to Chrome on this one for popping up a little status bar info in the lower left corner whenever the site is loading, or when you hover your mouse over a link.

RAM usage - I saw some people's posts about how Chrome only uses up to 70 MB of RAM after one day's use and whatnot. Well, I had Chrome use up 171 MB of RAM just last night after about 10mins or so. What's more, there is a "Google Chrome Helper" process taking up to 50 MB RAM apparently for each open tab, too. Well, at the end of the day, Chrome is probably still a winner in terms of being less of a resource hog than Safari. We'll see.

Speed - yes, Chrome opens quickly and is also quite fast (obviously faster than Firefox), but it's still not as snappy as Safari, which I immediately noticed after browsing a couple of websites. I also ran a Peacekeeper test on both browsers to prove my point, and yes, chrome scored 3500-something, while safari got almost 3900 points. So Safari is a winner here.

Searching - you can virtually use Chrome's URL bar as Google search so whether you are looking for your bookmarked site or non-bookmarked one, it will be really easy to find it, unlike Safari, where it's difficult to find even your bookmarked sites; unless you search by URL and NOT the name of the bookmark, you won't find it. So Chrome is a definite winner here. Oh, and I like how in Chrome when you click on URL bar above, it will immediately highlight it, unlike Safari where you'd need to click on the favicon on the far left of the URL to highlight the entire URL bar.

Favicons - I like how in Chrome you can have favicons on the bookmarks bar, while in Safari you can't. Also, in Safari every now and then it will occur that certain favicons won't get displayed (despite having Glims), which gets annoying to me. Apparently, just like in Firefox, Chrome won't have a problem with that, except it for some reason won't display favicons under "History" tab; don't know why. One thing I miss in Chrome is also a site's favicon to the left of the URL bar. But still, Chrome wins again.

The buttons - I hate Safari's refresh/stop button on the far right. Chrome keeps everything on the left nice and clean. Chrome wins again.

Tabs - Safari tends to beachball every now and then. If it crashes, it will take down the entire app. Chrome, on the other hand, will only crash the problematic tab. Kudos to Chrome on this one too!

Scrolling - still slightly jerkier in Chrome, so Safari wins on this one.

In short, I think when Chrome is fully compatible with 1Password and I'll be able to use most of the Firefox add-ons on Chrome, I'm pretty darn sure switching to Chrome. I'm willing to take the slight difference in snappiness over usability. Btw, when is it supposedly getting released officially?
 
Update: don't know if this is because I've installed AdBlock on it, but Chrome now opens on 2-3 bounces, which is quite "slow" compared to Safari's one bounce...
 
After giving Chrome a try i was amazed by its launch speed (nearly instant) and the low usage of RAM.

macrumors, gizmodo and engadget hp´s open:
Safari: 260 MB
Firefox: 200 MB
Chrome: 50 MB+50 MB (Chrome Helper)
Opera: 150 MB

But the scrolling and page rendering works the fastest with safari in my opinion. (I don´t have any extensions installed with any of the tested browsers. Opera Unite was activated though.)

For now, Safari gives me the best browsing experience, so the ressources it hogs are used well! ;-) :apple:

If I only had 2 GB of RAM I would consider Chrome though.
 
I like Chrome a lot and would love to use it more, but one thing I've noticed is that when you go back to the previous page (back button), it doesn't take you to the place you were at in the previous page; it always takes you to the top, forcing me to scroll down and find where I left off. Even on this very forum. Both Safari and Firefox put you back exactly where you were before.
 
Now that I've disabled AdBlock on Chrome, the app opens on one bounce (or even less) again.... I'm quite disappointed about how that extension slowed it down! I really hope they'll do something about it before the official release of Chrome for Mac.....
 
why does it matter how long it takes a browser to launch? i never quit mine.

anyways, you have to give the adblock extensions time to mature, it will be a while until they can hold a candle to adblock+ on firefox.
 
why does it matter how long it takes a browser to launch? i never quit mine.

anyways, you have to give the adblock extensions time to mature, it will be a while until they can hold a candle to adblock+ on firefox.

I just prefer it to launch instantaneously as opposed to taking bounces - and it's not just that - I have a feeling that having AdBlock installed does slow down the entire browser, too, and that is the main issue, not as much the start-up. It even says in AdBlock notes that the more subscriptions you have, the more it will slow your browser down..... They really need to do something about it.

Who can I contact to let them know about this issue?
 
Right now Chrome would be great if I was at all convinced that it is not a resource hog.
View attachment 210733

View attachment 210734

I second this! I ran my own little test today on FF3.6, Latest Chrome build, Latest Safari with the same 3 tabs on each open. Each browser without any addons etc and these are the results I got.

Screen+shot+2010-01-30+at+7.06.55+AM+copy.jpg

It seems that people don't look at chrome closely enough. Notice the chrome helpers... add them together and it passes safari easily. Notice the cpu usage is a lot more than safari also. Safari is just as snappy as Chrome so until Chrome stops hiding their resource hunger issues I will stick to safari :p.

Totals:
Chrome = 113.1mb memory, 1.5% cpu
Safari = 81.7mb memory, 0.9% cpu
FF = 121.5mb memory, 6.7% cpu
PS FF didn't even come into the equation.. poor guys are left in the dust big time, oh well they had their run. lol
 
From a user's view are there any differences between the dev and beta version of Chrome?

Yes. The bookmark manager works properly on the dev version. I've been using the dev versions for a long time on Windows and now on OSX and there have rarely been any real problems with them.

I like Chrome on OSX because it is a bit snappier than Firefox, supports HTML5 and is miles ahead Safari in the usability department. Chrome's extensions are slowly becoming pretty good too.

I just hope that they implement the languages options soon because I hate spellchecking.
 
I have found the Mac Beta Chrome to be far more stable and far more faster on my system then either Firefox OR Safari. I will be sticking with Chrome I think.

The only thing I haven't liked so far is that it does not warn you if you close a window with multiple tabs. Yeah, you can get them back, but I sometimes close the wrong window and getting a message like the other browsers give you would save on that. But that can be fixed later and probably will be. So I am a pretty happy camper cause the other browsers just can't keep up with all I throw at them. But so far, this one can!
 
Going to dl it now and see for myself. My problem at the moment is that after a short duration of browsing, both Firefox and Safari tend to hang. They're fast at first, but there's a problem somewhere and it's not going away.

------

Installed it at the moment, it's a actually really nice, themes are great and vibrant too. Any way to speed hack it like Firefox?
 
After giving Chrome a try i was amazed by its launch speed (nearly instant) and the low usage of RAM.

macrumors, gizmodo and engadget hp´s open:
Safari: 260 MB
Firefox: 200 MB
Chrome: 50 MB+50 MB (Chrome Helper)
Opera: 150 MB

I second this! I ran my own little test today on FF3.6, Latest Chrome build, Latest Safari with the same 3 tabs on each open.
Chrome = 113.1mb memory, 1.5% cpu
Safari = 81.7mb memory, 0.9% cpu
FF = 121.5mb memory, 6.7% cpu
test longer
 
THANK YOU! That worked like a charm, no more ads!
Have you noticed that the ads download, then display, then disappear?

Is that how adblockers work in FF and Safari?

I thought they actually stopped the ads from being downloaded?
 
i can't believe you guys are comparing CPU usages of 0-10%, is there any meaning to that at all?

find a cpu logger and the number is never constant. why arguing about variables?
 
Have you noticed that the ads download, then display, then disappear?

Is that how adblockers work in FF and Safari?

I thought they actually stopped the ads from being downloaded?

Chrome doesn't have an adblocker, they are adhiders. It is not technically possible to block content with Chrome extensions.
Firefox and Safari have real adblockers, that can block downloading of any content.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.