Trolled? OP hasn't been back since he made this, his only, post.![]()
Trolled? OP hasn't been back since he made this, his only, post.![]()
you don't have to be lucky to realize there are people out there being unlucky, 3 is not a big enough sample number anyway. you sure are not saying 100% of satisfaction for 100% safari users, are you?These things crack me up. All browsers on OS X suck? Oh do they? Hm, seems like I can make it through the day with Safari on my Mac Mini at work, my Macbook Pro, Macbook Air, and Mac Mini at home. Crazy, my 3 systems must just be lucky that they run Safari properly![]()
I hope you ask this question to apple, I recall apple mocking MS in its infamous mac vs pc ads, basically accusing microsoft require users to update hardware of their XP machine to properly run new OS. How absurd, right?When has an OS ever run faster than a previous version on identical hardware?
I get spinning beachball way more often than BSOD on XP. This is on a mac pro!
The day I knew I'd never go back to Windows was when I showed my Dad (lifetime mac user) how to hold the power button and do a hard shut down on his PowerBook when the HD started to die. In 4 years of owning the machine, he had never had to do it (and didn't know how). How many Windows users can say the same?
I'm switching back (for desktops) because I want i7, a decent graphics card and not to be limited by hardware choices.
But I'm keeping XP. Microsoft got that right at least.
what is your definition of a troll? post only one post and then not resume discussion? is that right?
rather than guessing other's motivation, its better just lay down your facts based arguments. Troll or not, you just need to trust people can judge for themselves. your help is not needed in this regard.
Those Windows users still running Windows 98 cannot say the same - those running XP SP2 and above have not been bothering with hard resets ever since.
... About 6 months ago it felt like everything was beginning to slow down. I ended up reinstalling Leopard and everything seemed to speed up again. ...
..but there are so many little problems with the software that really detract from the experience. it might not be slower but it certainly FEELS slower than windows - the interface is never as snappy as xp. little problems pop up now and then - certain buttons dont work for a while randomly, using random features suddenly crash the software, and every browser on the mac sucks compared to firefox on xp. firefox is sluggish, opera crashes, safari crashes all the time (4.0.2). mail deletes messages randomly every now and then. these occur about 20% of the time and are a lot more annoying than they seem.
i think using a windows is like driving on a slightly bumpy road, but using a mac is driving on a newly paved, really smooth road with random speed bumps every half mile or so. its better 80% of the time, but that 20% of the time just ruins the experience.
Those Windows users still running Windows 98 cannot say the same - those running XP SP2 and above have not been bothering with hard resets ever since.
Gaah. How many times the old rhetoric keeps popping up.
Sammyboy21, why did you create an account just to tell us this?
Sammyboy21, why did you create an account just to tell us this?
Troll or not, his experience and future is shared by many.
Microsoft is about to release the best version of Windows it has ever created. In my experience (and from reading the thoughts of others) it is stable, fast and reliable. It has a great new interface where no space is wasted and where multi-tasking is encouraged and assisted.
I loved Expose when I first tried it, but Aero Peek is just so much more intuitive. It's great having the application icon, and then being able to preview the windows open in that application. I don't like how OS X forces me to bind a different key to the standard one to do this.
I hear so many people here attacking Microsoft for the problems that Vista had. I experienced them as well but what I also experienced was a similar number of problems when I installed Leopard for the first time. Both companies are clearly making up for mistakes they have made - Apple with Leopard and Microsoft with Vista.
The difference that I can see though is that Apple veered off the path it was on - Tiger was incredible and is my favourite OS to date. It had the stability, speed and reliability which I crave so much and which they threw out of the window with Leopard. When Microsoft released Vista, XP was still pretty unreliable.
In contrast, in the past couple of years Microsoft has made great improvements to both of its released OSs. You might attack the company for releasing patch after patch, but at least they fix the problems! How many times do we have to read about a security hole in OS X on Mac or iPhone before Apple even considers patching it?
Now, I haven't tried Snow Leopard, but it doesn't look like it's bringing much that will help me. They're charging money for it (I can't tell you how many times I've read fanboys ranting about "OMG Microsoft should be ashamed to charge money for Windows 7" here) and clearly they realise that it isn't going to help many people because of the low price tag.
We can sing all we want about OpenCL and GCD, but there's only so much that I can do as a user - if the application can spring open 3 seconds quicker, that's 3 seconds less for me to think about what I was going to do with it or finish doing what I was doing in another application.
Now I'm not switching back to Windows only, but that's mainly because I don't need a new computer right now. But next time, when the choice is between Snow Leopard and Windows (and all the advantages of paying extra for a Mac are wiped out) I think my purchasing decision might go a little differently to the Mac Pro I bought earlier this year.
Windows 7 Ultimate Upgrade: $220
OS X Snow Leopard Upgrade: $30
Difference in cost: $190
Windows Vista Ultimate Full: $190
OS X Leopard Full: $97
Difference in cost: $93
Going from a fresh system, to Leopard, to Snow Leopard: $127
Going from a fresh system, to Vista, to 7: $410
Apple tax my @$$.
Snow Leopard is fast, it has a lot of good improvements, has Expose for individual applications, and is only $30.
You can talk about how stable Windows 7 is, blah blah blah. Yeah, you are right for the most part it is stable. But even non OS X users have seen me running Win 7 and said "Hey, [insert feature here] looks like Mac." Funny eh? Funny that even people who don't use OS X recognize that stuff.
Windows 7 Ultimate Upgrade: $220
OS X Snow Leopard Upgrade: $30
Difference in cost: $190
Windows Vista Ultimate Full: $190
OS X Leopard Full: $97
Difference in cost: $93
Going from a fresh system, to Leopard, to Snow Leopard: $127
Going from a fresh system, to Vista, to 7: $410
Apple tax my @$$.
Snow Leopard is fast, it has a lot of good improvements, has Expose for individual applications, and is only $30.
You can talk about how stable Windows 7 is, blah blah blah. Yeah, you are right for the most part it is stable. But even non OS X users have seen me running Win 7 and said "Hey, [insert feature here] looks like Mac." Funny eh? Funny that even people who don't use OS X recognize that stuff.
Windows 7 Ultimate Upgrade is $220 on amazon. Sorry, but it is very close to $220, as close as you can get.This isn't really fair. I pre-ordered my copy of Windows 7 for £44.99. Amazon isn't doing that offer any more, but they are still selling it for £64.98 - nowhere close to $220.
I know this, but to be fair I included both the full price of Leopard and the full price of Vista to even the playing fields.Additionally, most users won't consider the licensing cost of Vista or Leopard because it came with their machine. Only those who are making two jumps XP->Vista->7 or Tiger->Leopard->Snow Leopard will really notice.
I have beat this argument down 500,000 times. My Dell Inspiron E1505 was $1800. My Macbook Pro was $1800. Same price, both 15" laptops.The difference is that these Mac users probably paid more for their computer in the first place. Microsoft is a software company, so it's not surprising that they are looking to profit from their software. Apple just does the profiteering at the other end.
Media center is good, but the only good thing about it is the TV Tuner. I find the rest of Media Center to be lame and clunky. I never use Front Row either.I don't doubt that it is fast - that's all that Apple has talked about. My point is that Leopard is already fast - I don't need it to be any faster to get my work done. As for features, there aren't many and they're still bundling the awful Front Row when Windows is miles ahead with Media Center.
You are on crack. Do you want me to benchmark my Snow Leopard install vs a Windows 7 install? Snow Leopard boots to desktop, fully loaded in 30 seconds and shuts down in 3 seconds. My fresh Windows 7 takes about 45 seconds to start up and 15 seconds to shut down. Fresh.The main thing for you to realise is that I think that Windows 7 is ahead of Leopard and it's looking very doubtful that Snow Leopard is going to exceed 7 in performance or usability. Let's be positive and imagine that Windows 7 and Snow Leopard are pretty much equal - the decision most people will have to make is whether to spend hundreds of dollars extra on a case. That's the only edge which Apple's machines are going to have (but even this is in doubt thanks to new and improved machines from Dell, HP and suchlike)
Kind of unfair that you're using Windows Ultimate for the comparison. Even if it is the most feature-complete version, most people just go with premium (or maybe basic).
I have beat this argument down 500,000 times. My Dell Inspiron E1505 was $1800. My Macbook Pro was $1800. Same price, both 15" laptops.
You are on crack. Do you want me to benchmark my Snow Leopard install vs a Windows 7 install? Snow Leopard boots to desktop, fully loaded in 30 seconds and shuts down in 3 seconds. My fresh Windows 7 takes about 45 seconds to start up and 15 seconds to shut down. Fresh.
And with Dell you get tech support based in a country where you cannot understand any of the support techs, and also get cheap computers made from clunky plastic parts. Wow, sounds like a fun time to me.
ANY credibility you had, and I mean ANY is gone. Sorry, but you fail worse than anyone else here has ever failed. Why?Good for you. If 15" is the only criteria we're using here let's compare two:
HP 550 - £269.99
MacBook Pro 15" - £1360.32
I don't measure the performance of anything based on how long it takes to turn on or turn off, unless that time is obscenely long. With Windows 7, it really isn't.
I actually laughed out loud when I read this. You described exactly my experience with Apple. My white MacBook started discolouring and I called them up - I don't know what country they were in but the people I spoke to were difficult to understand.