Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zerolight

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 6, 2006
518
104
Glasgow
I realise that everyone is in the same boat, but why does a 32GB Touch have 29.96GB Capacity? iPods have always been like this, true, but HDDs sizes are generally more fluid, with say an 80GB HDD varying from 75GB to 85GB from manufacturer to manufacturer, so itmakes sens that on such iPods, you see a deviation in actual size. But flash memory is always pretty accurate, certainly to within a few mb. The 2GB difference is pretty shocking... that's space for 10 TV shows, or 350 songs. Why wasn't it called a 30GB Touch, 15GB Touch, and 7.5GB Touch. And how on earth have they managed to lose 2GB from chips that come in multiples of 8GB? Surely impossible?

Is it something sensible, like they reserve a portion of memory as a swap file? Seems unlikely since it already has 512mb of ram. Or have they just ordered custom flash memory, perhaps in a cheaper non standard size, then rounded it up to a standard size?

I wouldn't mind so much if all models had lost the same amount - 7.3GB, 15.3GB, 31.3GB. I dunno, seems a bit off.

Is there a technical reason that Apple have chopped off the capacity? Or is it just cheapness?

thanks.
 

andybno1

Suspended
Nov 6, 2007
3,643
38
Liverpool, UK
I'm no technical whizz here but bear with me.

its not just apple that do this all hard drives advertise one size but the actual amount available is less. The missing space from what I have understood is for when you get corruption on the disk they use part of the missing data to use in its place.......... I may be wrong but that is kinda my understanding of it all
 

zerolight

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 6, 2006
518
104
Glasgow
I'm no technical whizz here but bear with me.

its not just apple that do this all hard drives advertise one size but the actual amount available is less. The missing space from what I have understood is for when you get corruption on the disk they use part of the missing data to use in its place.......... I may be wrong but that is kinda my understanding of it all

I agree, makes sense for HDDs. But the touch uses flash memory where the same rules don't apply.

I guess this kinda applies...

here is the math
8 bit = 1 byte
1 kb = 1024 byte
1 gb = 1024*1024*1024

or
19,709,083,648/(1024*1024*1024) = 18.35551452636719 GB

=
18.3 GB
 

I3eXa

macrumors 6502
Aug 24, 2004
308
0
IdaPIMP
because you need to 'format' the drive with itunes, disk utility (for hard drives) it creates a reference table if you will and that takes up space. For hard drives on top of that it needs to create a partition and such, and can suck almost 60GB from my western digital 500GB hard drive. That's why everything is listed as 'approximate.'
 

gnasher729

Suspended
Nov 25, 2005
17,980
5,565
I agree, makes sense for HDDs. But the touch uses flash memory where the same rules don't apply.

I guess this kinda applies...

here is the math
8 bit = 1 byte
1 kb = 1024 byte
1 gb = 1024*1024*1024

or
19,709,083,648/(1024*1024*1024) = 18.35551452636719 GB

=
18.3 GB

See the small print on Apple's web page. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. And of course 1 GB is not 1024 * 1024 * 1024 bytes. That is one GiB.
 

TEG

macrumors 604
Jan 21, 2002
6,621
169
Langley, Washington
Advertised Capacity is based on the premise that 1KB = 10^3, 1MB = 10^6, 1GB = 10^9 (which are based on decimal values). Formatted capacity is based on 1KB = 2^10, 1MB = 2^20, 1GB = 2^30. As a result, you still have the same capacity, it is just reported differently. The best solution is to indicate what a formatted capacity is by placing an 'i' inbetween the K/M/G/T and the B to prevent someone from using the SI definations of those letters.

So KiB, MiB, GiB, etc.

TEG
 

tacofreak

macrumors member
Feb 28, 2008
38
0
Have you ever thought about the memory being used for the apps??? Since its a touch..????????And maybe its being used for newer things like updates with apps?
 

aidanpendragon

macrumors 6502a
Jul 26, 2005
928
8
There's also an "invisible" ~300MB or so OS partition, apparently. This also comes off the top, before your "available space" stat in iTunes.

Note that the January applications, at least on Touches where they didn't come standard but were downloaded later, add ~80-100MB to the "Other" stat within available space - i.e., they aren't put into the OS partition.

If the OP or anyone else has either a 32GB model, or a 8/16GB model that came with the apps as standard, please report on your "Other" size, and your top formatted/available capacity. I'm curious if those that shipped with the apps have a bigger OS partition, or continue putting them in "Other."

For reference, my Sept/Oct 16GB Touch has 14.84GB total capacity; 18.4MB "Other" under 1.1.2; and ~105MB "Other" under 1.1.4.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.