I'm only going to reply to points I haven't already covered in a previous reply.
You do realize that not everything is specs. You want to know why so many people want iPhones? Because they Work and work well. Probably only 5% of smartphone users care what kind of processor is under their phones hood. They dont care about 1GB RAM. What they care about is having a phone that is going to work when they need and be easy to use.
I've been using an iPhone for ages. I'm currently using a Mac and an iPad. That's a testiment that I think this way. However, disregarding all the specs, I would want a phone that is going to work when I shove an unconverted, full-HD anime episode at it, and play it without a hassle.
Say what you want about apple's closed UI but it does deliver a solid user experience that works. Androids fragmented platform leads to things like Multiple freezes and crashes daily. (I know, I tried android to see what it was all about) also there are not as many apps as android claims. since there is no regulation there can be 10 different versions of one app and non of them that work!!!!
Uhh...haven't had that on the SGS II yet. I think that's a rumor people seem to think when they've played with cheap Android handsets, assuming it's representative of the real experience.
And as for the unregulated Android Market, yeah, I do like the App Store's layout more. It does take more time to find what you want, but in the end, you can find it.
Personally, I think you are unsure about your deceision and are looking for some reassurance.
Haha, don't worry. I'm quite happy with my purchase and I still have an iPad.
But does it control an Apple TV? I see no mention of that. And isn't that the reverse-engineered program by the DVD-breaking guy? Will it keep working? How can we be sure? Isn't this likely to be broken many times in the future?
I don't own an Apple TV, so I don't quite understand what you mean by controlling it. I had the Remote app for my iPhone 4 and I used it to control iTunes. If you're expecting the same with an Apple TV, wouldn't the built-in controls for the media player while streaming the movie to the Apple TV act as the controls?
Unless you mean for stuff like Netflix and YouTube. I don't see why you can't just use that physical remote the Apple TV comes with.
And what do you sync contacts with since MobileMe won't work? Using g-mail doesn't seem to work too well, many of the fields are different between iOS and Google. Does it really sync everything between Address Book on the Mac and on the iPhone? I set it up for my father-in-law with his iPhone and it didn't seem to really be a perfect match as the fields didn't all match up.
I've actually never used MobileMe. I've always just synced my contacts by plugging the iPhone into the Mac, so in my case, when I switch to Android, nothing's really changed.
And has Android made its interface feel nicer? Does it rubber-band now? Or does Apple still sue anyone who has that? I haven't played with one recently, maybe that's changed. And what about the hardware? It doesn't bother you that the back of that phone is ugly as hell? That's not the most important thing, but it kind of matters a little bit.
lol, no. It doesn't rubber band. I mentioned before that Android will never beat iOS in terms of polish, but that's not going to stop me jumping ship to a superior piece of tech when the gap becomes too large. Sure, it has stopped me for many years but this time the SGS II's specs and usability are just too great to ignore.
I need to buy a car for going to work, occasionally passing people on the highway, maybe making some long distance trips.
I could buy a race car with 1000 horsepowers and eleventy-two turbos, plus a supercharger.
Or, I could buy a modest car with four doors, a simple 4 cylinder with direct injection for a little more oomph, and a trunk that isn't filled with nitrous bottles and large speakers.
If I'm going to live on a race track, I'm going to pick the racecar.
If I'm going to live a "normal" life, I'm going to buy the modest car.
It astounds me why people think they need 32gigawatts of power on a smartphone. Sure, it's nice to have something quick, but it's a phone. It can't play Crysis.
As far as I'm concerned, an iPhone 4 is just as fast as this new Samsung Milkyway or whatever, because in my experience, none of the apps available for the device make it "lag", yet, at least not for myself, and nobody is going to develop apps that the phone can't handle. I don't have to "wait" for Safari to open, I don't have to "wait" on my music or videos, why should I throw out my iPhone to purchase a Samsung whatever when it's already instantaneous.
I realize that more power and higher specs would result in "higher quality apps", and believe me, I don't want to step in the way of progression, I'm all for progression, but the grocery store isn't any harder to get to without a race car.
I'm not knocking your decision, by any means, I've toyed with Android a little, and I do find the OS interesting. But phones are far different from computers, where specs actually make a real difference, so they should be treated as such.
Good response. I wouldn't toss out my iPhone 4 either if I didn't need spend hours every day watching anime on the bus.
The iPhone will ALWAYS be superior over any Android device. This will never change. Why? Because the company, being Apple... Is just amazing. And I'm talking customer service wise. Something happens to your iPhone, you just bring it to Apple and the majority of the time you walk out saying "Wow I can't believe they gave me a brand new iPhone." Or "I can't believe they were such great help."
I remember when I had a problem with my iPod and it had to be shipped in for repairs. I called them and explained the problem and a day later I received a box in the mail from Apple that had the prepaid shipping fees and all the protection in the box to protect my iPod. I didn't even ask for it, nor did they mention it. Little things like that make the difference.
People don't just buy the iPhone because of the phone, they buy the product because of the company. If Google released an iPad 2 (Identical to Apple's iPad) I bet it still wouldn't sell as many units as the iPad 2 would from an Apple store.
I use to own an Android device and I had a major problem with my phone and it just stopped working. I'd get it to turn on sometimes, and other times it just would freeze up and do nothing. I called the company and I got no answer. I left a message to ask them to call back... a week goes by, still no call. I call again... I get an answer, and then I'm put on hold for an hour with STILL no one picking up on the other side. That was the last time I'll ever buy an Android phone. Their phones aren't bad, but their customer service is just garbage. And not to mention, once you buy the phone, you're stuck with it like that. Every year you're able to upgrade your iPhone to the latest iOS. (As long as the phone is eligible for the upgraded iOS.) Which makes your phone seem brand new almost every year. That's another thing I love.
Oh and not to mention, when you buy an Android phone, it's obsolete in a month.
Apple is just a better company, and that's why they are so successful. They don't need to release a phone every two weeks to 'stay in the game'.
Well, since my iPhone 4 was jailbroken, I've never actually walked into a Genius bar to get help. Whenever it encountered any problems, I had to take care of it myself. Apple's customer service is something I've experienced before with my Macs, and I do know it's great. However, since the iPhone has to be jailbroken to be functional, it's something I've never experienced and having no customer service means nothing to me. Also, the SGS II ships with a 2 year warranty.
As for Android phones being obsolete in a month, that argument used to work until Google announced that all released Android handsets must be able to receive the latest firmware for 18 months after release. That matches iOS devices in terms of longevity.
Because it works for them.
Quite a few of us tech-savvy individuals have parlayed our knowledge into a living, in which we're paid to produce results and solve problems for other people. If I'm too busy solving my own problems, or deciding which Android kernel I want to compile to take full advantage of the blistering specs that I've supposedly spent so much time drooling over, then that's less time I have for helping others... and earning money.
Or.... I can just use what works elegantly with a minimum of fuss.
Additionally, OS X (and iOS) has be pretty good about making the most of the hardware. The hardware doesn't need to be blindingly fast or cutting edge to make the software function well. And so, there's less of a need to ditch phones every month for the latest and greatest for the sake of having it...
unless you happen to be the type that likes to boast about how your phone has the fastest clock speed.
Personally, I have better things to do than sit in a basement all day and boast about my cell phone's clock speed. Like, communicate with other people ON my phone to arrange to meet up with them and you know, be social. But, that's just me.
Also, I think having a Mac and an iPad (as I do and apparently you as well), it would make LESS sense to then ditch the iPhone for an android device. Sure those hardware specs are great, but now I have two mobile ecosystems to deal with, and two sets of apps to manage. No thanks.
Ha, you're absolutely right there. Why did I have a 3GS for a whole year instead of jumping ship to the HTC Droid Incredible? For the same reason as you, of course. iOS doesn't need a lot of specs to function incredibly well, and that's something I've always applauded Apple for.
I'm jumping to the SGS II this time because of a practical need I have of requiring it to play high definition video files. I know this isn't possible unless you have hardware acceleration. When I saw the iPad 2 couldn't do it (due to iOS's restrictions), I lost hope that iPhone 5 will be able to, so I couldn't help but switch. It's not a matter of whether iOS can run well without much specs - it's how it's restrictive to developers that they can't even make a media player that takes advantage of the A5 chip.