Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seems like it has better dynamic range, warmer tones, more magenta than green (6S). Some of the images seem a little over. Just give me an exposure compensation feature. Looks like it could be dropped - 0.7 of a stop.

Difficult to tell whether dynamic range is better, certainly no reason why it should be worse, but that restaurant shot and some other low light ones I have seen would indeed be better with exposure turned down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lancastor
I haven't seen it myself. We're due to upgrade our phones together in the coming months. Will see it on the iPhone then, but I suspect Apple will push an update to alleviate any issues that people with heightened eyesight (see:Overactive) such as the OP's would have.

Look at the Note 7 pictures. Gorgeous beatiful green gras. It seems iPhone 7 cannot produce green color.

There must be an explanation why the colors in the iPhone 7 are so bad.
Hard to since they keep exploding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jk4lebron23
Assuming your reply is to me, I was a working professional photographer for twelve years.

Poor dynamic range is the achilles heel of small sensors and the overexposure of this scene draws attention to it on the iPhone 7+ more than the other pics. Blown-out highlights can never be recovered.

My comment is limited to this scene, more general use might well tell a different story.

Can those blown out highlights be corrected by editing the RAW file? Sorry if the question is dumb. I'm a novice photographer at best.
 
Can those blown out highlights be corrected by editing the RAW file? Sorry if the question is dumb. I'm a novice photographer at best.

Yes there is much better prospect of recovering blown highlights with RAW. Most RAW converters have highlight recovery tools and highlight and shadow adjustments which can be applied without changing the overall exposure. But you can also change the overall exposure more successfully with RAW.
 
Today some review videos from the iPhone 7 are released on YouTube.

In comparison the images of the iPhone 6S are much better than the iPhone 7 images.

Comparison starting at 6:00min


So my question was: Why are the colors of the newer generation camera of iPhone 7 and 7S so vibrant and colorless.

It seems that image processing of the new ISP is destroying the pictures of caused by misscinfiguration.

There is a chance that an iOS update does an better exposure control. But currently the color of the iPhone 7 photos are really awful. :(
The cameras now capture wider color gamut + the display is p3 spec wide color gamut . Everything is gonna be more vibrant and has more color into it. I love it personally .
 
  • Like
Reactions: jk4lebron23
In all fairness, Engadget isn't a photography site. I wouldn't take their recommendations seriously. Just use your own personal judgement. For me, the 6S had some shots I preferred over Samsung Galaxy 7, but for the most part, I liked Samsung especially in low light.

I actually own a s7 Edge and 6s plus. The s7 edge does do low light well, but those pictures I just saw on the one site linked in here from SI, those are SLR quality pictures. Awesome pics. The S7 can't do that well.
 
Look at the Note 7 pictures. Gorgeous beatiful green gras. It seems iPhone 7 cannot produce green color.

There must be an explanation why the colors in the iPhone 7 are so bad.
Perhaps the answer is, you are viewing a DCI-P3 photo on a non DCI-P3 display?
 
Because Apple wants it thin. Samsung made the same mistake last year with the S6/S6 edge.

Would be nice to go back to 9mm thick like the iPhone 4. No protruding camera hump and pack a bigger battery. But 5-7mm range seems to be the "in" to be thin. Before you know, our phones will be like credit cards.
 
I didn't mention any reasons....?
yes you did:
That's one more phone available for those of us who appreciate the iPhone and its capabilities

[doublepost=1473813298][/doublepost]
I actually own a s7 Edge and 6s plus. The s7 edge does do low light well, but those pictures I just saw on the one site linked in here from SI, those are SLR quality pictures. Awesome pics. The S7 can't do that well.
Good, that's reassuring; however, I do most of my shooting in low light.
 
Must have misread the title. Need my coffee. Apologies to the last post which I saw before exiting the thread. I do read my posts a few times to catch my misspellings. I misread overexposed as why is the camera lens protruding so much?

Quoting Star Wars - "Stay on target. Stay on target" ...

Wait for the Michael Fisher video review! Forget The Verge and all that. I don't even know the guy. But we both share the same taste. He loves Nokia and Motorola. Dual wielded between a Lumia and Moto. Likewise. He is quite an expert with photography. If you want a thorough camera shootout, wait for GSM Arena camera shootout.

I do agree. Samsung looks better in low light. I also like that they make their own camera modules. Samsung didn't really hit its stride with camera quality until the S5 although a nicer display can fool us into thinking it takes great photos. Post in on your computer and compare.

Samsung is surpassing Apple behind in a couple areas - camera and design. But still behind in software and ecosystem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Assuming your reply is to me, I was a working professional photographer for twelve years.

Poor dynamic range is the achilles heel of small sensors and the overexposure of this scene draws attention to it on the iPhone 7+ more than the other pics. Blown-out highlights can never be recovered.

My comment is limited to this scene, more general use might well tell a different story.

I was referring to lancastor. But anyway, would you mind sharing your work? I would like to see what a professional photographer could achieve in 12 years.
 
I retired in 2010 and took down my website and all publicity.

Thats unfortunate. Since many photographers who claim to be "professional" photographers take terrible photos.. I would have loved to be a professional photographer, but my parents didn't allow me back then when I was young, so it became a hobby.
 
Look at the Note 7 pictures. Gorgeous beatiful green gras. It seems iPhone 7 cannot produce green color.

There must be an explanation why the colors in the iPhone 7 are so bad.

So they can sell you a "7S plus" (or 8 - whatever) with an upgraded camera next round. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lancastor
Thats unfortunate. Since many photographers who claim to be "professional" photographers take terrible photos.. I would have loved to be a professional photographer, but my parents didn't allow me back then when I was young, so it became a hobby.

I was lucky enough to be able to retire early at 52 on a good pension and start up my photography business for the last years of my working life. Despite efforts on my part, googling my business name gets a lot of hits so I still get enquiries, as well as from former clients. Yes, I have seen some terrible photos taken by professional photographers, but also I think amateurs can become obsessed with tiny technical differences which aren't important to the customer. All depends on the market.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.