Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I love my iPod Touch 5th gen. It does what I bought it for…. plays music every day. It's either docked to a Bose speaker system, or it's playing music in my car (via Bluetooth connection).

And even better…. I can use the iPod Touch any time, knowing that I don't pay monthly payments to Verizon or AT&T for using it.

A simple device. It works beautifully for its intended use. Music.

----------



Uhh, then you don't know about the iPod Touches. The Touch has all the same WiFi and Bluetooth connections as the iPhone. We don't have to use cables to synch anything (except for the first time), we have the option to use Cloud synching. We also use Wifi for iOS updates. We download our iTunes songs wirelessly from The Cloud just like an iPhone.

Right. I wouldn't know about the iPod Touches... I purchased my first iPod Touch as soon as the first generation was released. I bet I owned one long before most people. But no, I left it out of my argument because I wouldn't consider the iPod Touch to be dying as the thread states, I find this thread more aimed towards the iPod Classic, Nanos, Shuffles and all that. The iPod touch is more of an iPhone derivative rather than iPod, IMO. Although the market may be declining, it is still present, for the iPod Touch.
 
Yes, but they can't even take decent pictures with the camera they own. Owning a better camera would teach them lighting, composition, staging, and how it affects the aesthetic considerations of a photo. Unfortunately there are the people who don't even care about learning a dSLR's controls, and treat it like a glorified P&S (too many of these folks out there). Still, it's better than taking crappy shots with an iPhone camera.

You know this isn't true, if it were then owning a better car would make people better drivers, owning a better stove would make people better cooks and owning better shoes would make people better athletes.

A person that possesses a creative talent--or any talent for that matter--isn't going to be held back by limited tools. Instead, they learn everything about the tools they have and push them often past their limits to accomplish what they envision.

Don't get me wrong, having better tools makes the job easier--but it's having the lesser quality tools, combined in natural talent or vision that makes you learn how to do the job right in the first place.

As for the iPod question--it isn't dying and never was. It has simply evolved. While some people still prefer a standalone music player, most do not. They'd rather carry one device instead of two. It's as simple as that. The iPod and iPhone are not really different products, they each embody the peak of what a mobile multimedia device could be at the time they were developed.
 
Still excellent. :)

0c22d8144ef711e3a0620e39fd499eff_8.jpg

Does you lunch box play music, too?
 
I have a 160 GB Classic that holds my entire library but for me it's just easier to use my 32GB iPhone 5C. I wish they would update the Classic, but I can see why they don't.
 
True, but for those of us who do "need" (or even want) a smartphone, our music is already in our pockets; no need to carry a second device.

I imagine the decline of the iPod is directly proportional to the rise of the iPhone.

Well said. The decline of the iPod can be directly traced to Apple's premier device, iPhone. It took over the iPod because it's a mixture of a cell phone and iPod all in one. Why have separate devices?
 
OMG! Izz dat theeng still using a SCSI cable?!

lol j/k :D

Firewire rocks! at least in comparison to USB-anything.

And being able to mount your iPod as a HDD on the desktop, by default. Priceless. We have lost a lot.
 
I doubt it's because of the Zune or other competitors.

I still use and love my 1st Generation iPod 5GB everyday. Not everyone needs a smartphone, which ironically makes the user dumb.

I just don't get it. Maybe Apple needs to bring back those iPod Silhouette commercials.

Because there is a better iPod that more people are gravitating toward.

It's called an iPhone...

 
I just use my ipod nano for the gym! I dont need a huge iphone in my pocket

I own a ipod touch for movies. and I have a non smart phone old nokia and im happy

I dont need one device
 
Your previous iphone makes a good ipod since resale values are insultingly low. And it doubles as an emergency phone that can be reactivated if your current one is lost or damaged.
 
Why have separate devices?

to use it for the gym, it fits inside your pocket nicely. Plus I don't use the phone a lot.

not all of us are smartphone zombies that need to be on them 24/7 like this current generation of dumbed down people.
 
Do you guys think that Apple will swap the iPod Classic with an SSD and maybe pixel-double the screen as well so it becomes a retina display in the near future?
 
I still use my iPod classic in the car because I had my stereo upgraded, and it only works with a 30-pin connector. I also use it at College - I am far from home and it's nice to have most of my music to hand.

I use my iPhone to listen to most of my music on the go because of iTunes in the Cloud, but only where there's Wi-Fi because it eats up my data.
 
Whatever

Whatever, my daughter has an iPod Nano 3G (we bought it —used but in good condition— for her 9th. birthday, in 2012) and she loves it. She has no need for an iPhone (not yet, and not here, where they're a luxury item) and she uses her iPod a lot. She has there all her favourite Rush songs, and quite a lot more. Recently, for her 10th. birthday (we bought her a guitar) we connected some AC-powered speakers to her iPod in shuffle/random mode and her party had lotsa great music.

And that iPod's battery life is just barely an inch short of a miracle. Not only it's a sturdy little metallic warrior, but it also has a very good resolution screen, excellent sound quality (really impressive) and a fully charged battery has juice for so much time that it even feels strange.

Technology will keep on making waves after waves, but I have the feeling that years from now we'll still use that lovely sturdy metallic warrior called iPod Nano 3G.

And sorry for my english (it's not my native tongue)
 
I still use my 160GB Classic in the car. I bought a Pioneer touch screen DVD player several years ago for my car just because I could display what is playing on the screen and even play videos from the iPod on the decks screen.

I never liked using my phone as my player in the car plus even the 64GB is too small to carry everything that I want.

I own a 6th generation 16GB Nano that I rarely use and my old 30GB iPod Photo still works and holds a charge but I have rarely used it. It's always been my Classic.

I'll be sad when the iPod is no longer for sale.
 
It has been cannibalized by the iPhone.

I still had my 160GB iPod Classic back when I had an iPhone 3G that was only 8GB and couldn't hold a fraction of my library. Now that Apple has come out with iTunes Match, I have my entire 90GB library accessible from my iPhone from anywhere even though the phone itself only has 32GB of storage. Makes the iPod obsolete for me now so I sold it a few years ago.

And how does that work?
 
I have heard this same question asked on many other sites but to those who claim to want the best audio, why are you using an iPod with lossless music?
 
I have heard this same question asked on many other sites but to those who claim to want the best audio, why are you using an iPod with lossless music?
In a word, capacity. Also convenience. iPods integrate so easily with car stereos and other docking devices. At home, where I can really get the best audio, I don't use an ipod.
Do you have a suggestion?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.