One of our Dell's has a 1920x1200 15.4" LCD display and even with my sharp eyes, that's mighty darn small text and icons.![]()
I wouldnt mind a 1680x1050 on the 15" though.
One of our Dell's has a 1920x1200 15.4" LCD display and even with my sharp eyes, that's mighty darn small text and icons.![]()
Small energy efficiency boosts are great, and I definitely prefer anything environmentally friendly (it is really the heavy metals in the CCFL and not the energy efficiency that is accelerating the change), but... that business case is just silly. Even if you keep the notebook long past its generally-accepted usable life, I find it quite unlikely that you'll save $100 in energy costs before it dies.
At a power savings of about 1 watt (generous), and the average 2007 US power costs (10.6 cents / kWh), $100 = 943 kWh = 943,000 Wh. So, if you run your Macbook continuously, with the screen constantly on, for 107 years, you'll save your $100.
Of course, $100 is also an absurd cost estimate for an LED display assembly...
Me too! I'd kill to get a hires 15", that would be close to a perfect mix for a laptop for me. The 17" is just too big and heavy for many situations.
Laptops shouldnt be used on our laps cause the heat produced is bad for our testicles, due to a known survey! So for me a 17" laptop isnt a problem of not beeing able to place it on my lap, i ll always have it on a desk, where ever i go (not interested in using it outdoors)!If it's uncomfortable on your lap then it's big by my metrics.
Laptops shouldnt be used on our laps cause the heat produced is bad for our testicles, due to a known survey! So for me a 17" laptop isnt a problem of not beeing able to place it on my lap, i ll always have it on a desk, where ever i go (not interested in using it outdoors)!
One of our Dell's has a 1920x1200 15.4" LCD display and even with my sharp eyes, that's mighty darn small text and icons.![]()
No need in pointing that out, its rather obvious!laptop = lap + top
desktop = desk + top
![]()