Stop assuming that your preferences are universal and it won't be so baffling.I've never understood this.
Your example is just poor decision making and ignorance but there are a number of reasons.So if you buy a $600+ device that you carry with you daily, why wouldn't you want to protect it?
For one thing, people have varying levels regarding what they're willing to insure. A $600 item isn't expensive enough for many to insure. There are those that view insurance only worthwhile for major items such as cars, homes, etc.
For another, some prefer to self insure.
Again, it's a matter of preference and you can't just assume that everyone should insure their iPhones just because you do. I actually use AppleCare+ but I don't assume that everyone else has to or else they're idiots. Each person needs to assess whether or not he/she thinks it's wanted or necessary.
Don't assume that those that don't share your preferences are idiots. An iPhone isn't an investment. It's a (rapidly) depreciating asset.My question is, u have a 650+ investment, what idiot wouldn't protect it against life?
It's not always a ripoff but like casinos, the house always wins. If it wasn't profitable it wouldn't be sold. It wouldn't be profitable it a critical mass didn't actually need it and paid for it anyway.How is insurance a rip-off?
That's a fair enough point but the OP seems only to be harping "buy insurance or you're a moran!" instead. In any case, an ignorant consumer only has his/her self to blame. Phone subsidies aren't a mysterious secret.I think the take home point is that people don't realize their $200 phone isn't actually a $200 phone.
Last edited: