The amount of times I wish I could easily just AirDrop a file from my phone or MacBook to a Linux install is crazy. PLEASE let this be an industry standard.
I.. uh.. am not sure how to respond to this, other than that I don't think you quite understand what the word "elitist" means.Again funny. It’s the Android users who are elitist talking about how advanced tech users prefer Android as they can customize it and tweak their devices as they see fit.
This particular thread is about certain users wanting a company to actively block interoperability between themselves and half of the other smartphone users in the world - making their own lives worse in the process - just so that they can retain some kind of artificial sense of "specialness".They claim iPhone users are just sheep who buy them because they lack the skills to of “tach savvy” Android users.
My pleasure.Thanks for helping to make my point (along with several other posters in this thread).
Guess I'll just have to continue to be a clueless "tach savvy" Android user then...And the point goes right over your head. Goes along with your fake arguments.
and apple will happily force you to pay for it 😁Sure, and the EU will probably fine Apple by a few billions more 😁
door has always been open to get an android.Anything to keep people locked-in people, right?
Screw that.
it's apple's tech. they can do whatever they want and should do whatever they want.Why?
Maybe so, but it is beneficial for all users, with little if any downsides.Because this is hacked? Because it’s uncertain and depending on Apple to keep it alive with no formal agreements in place?
It is a result of the EU... Previously, Apple used a proprietary protocol called Apple Wireless Direct Link (AWDL) for this and other continuity features. The EU required Apple to use interoperable wireless standards starting with iOS 26, and deprecate AWDL. Without the EU requiring this change, this wouldn't have been possible by Google.No, it's not. It's Google reverse engineering the standard. But it will be if Apple does something, so they might not.
The rulings required Apple to add support for the Wi-Fi Alliance’s Wi-Fi Aware standard instead of AWDL—and in fact required Apple to deprecate AWDL and to help add its features to Wi-Fi Aware so that any device could benefit from them. This wasn’t quite the imposition it sounded like; Wi-Fi Aware was developed with Apple’s help, based on the work Apple had already done on AWDL. But it meant that Apple could no longer keep other companies out of AirDrop by using a functionally similar but private communication protocol instead of the standardized version.
arstechnica.com
The downside is it's hacked with no formal agreements, apple can change some aspect of the handshake and break it.Maybe so, but it is beneficial for all users, with little if any downsides.
I've been working on a specific theory that anyone who thinks iPhones are exclusive or elite either aren't the most knowledgeable about wealth and what it means to be wealthy or they're out of touch and don't realize how accessible Apple products (or electronics in general) are even for people in poverty.100% agree, yet it’s hilarious that they think that iPhones are somehow elite or exclusive. You can pick up one at wal-mart for $200 out the door with no payments, or on mint, etc.
I have a feeling someone at apple knew Google was about to announce this, otherwise its an insane coincidence.Next update it’s broken.
If Google is exploiting a vulnerability, then that vulnerability should be patched.Why is anyone here *against* interoperability like this? I've so often wanted to AirDrop something to my Android friends and been frustrated that it's not possible. This is a GOOD thing with zero downside to us users.
they'll lose.This is a test.
If Apple blocks it, Google will sue and then the USA will begin their process to open up the iOS ecosystem just like the EU and other regions.
*it's a trap meme*
arstechnica.com
You can use the phone (the hardware) in whatever way you want, you can break it, you can use it as door stopper if you want it to, however you don't own the OS or the rest of the ecosystem, you are granted a license to use it, this is well understood, when you buy a of copy windows or Mac os, it does not give you the right to make changes to the OS, you want that get Linux, you want to use the phone with a different OS or use it in a different way, get an android device compatible withEcosystems need to be damaged; killed even. Use what you want, on whatever system you want, for whatever reason you want.
It’s YOUR phone, not Apples.
Android has had Quick Share / Nearby Share for at least 3-4 years now. It works EXACTLY the same way AirDrop does including creating Ad-Hoc WiFi networks. Now, this is Google's own implementation. Even 3rd party apps have been able to replicate something similar although not in a clean user interface like AirDrop, but creating WiF hotspots to transfer files has been a standard for some time. No one is using Bluetooth to transfer files. It's painfully slow.I think there is a standard for Bluetooth file transfers, it's crazy slow though. AirDrop is unique in, even if the two devices are not on the same wifi network, they will negotiate and create a temporary ad-hoc wifi network between them. I wonder if Google has replicated this part of the protocol? Or is it wifi only on the same network, bluetooth otherwise?
How is it more of a security a security risk than it is between Apple devices? It can only work if both devices are set by you the user to 'receive from anyone for 10 minutes.' Another Apple user who happens to be in your contacts could send you something against your will, something another Pixel user cannot do.This absolutely needs shutting down as its both a security risk and damaging to the ecosystem Apple has invested huge sums of money in building out. You hear it all the time from people reviewing Android hardware... they miss AirDrop when they try switching to anything not an iPhone.
Shut it down. Kill it. Apple has every right to lock Android out.