Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Again funny. It’s the Android users who are elitist talking about how advanced tech users prefer Android as they can customize it and tweak their devices as they see fit.
I.. uh.. am not sure how to respond to this, other than that I don't think you quite understand what the word "elitist" means.

They claim iPhone users are just sheep who buy them because they lack the skills to of “tach savvy” Android users.
This particular thread is about certain users wanting a company to actively block interoperability between themselves and half of the other smartphone users in the world - making their own lives worse in the process - just so that they can retain some kind of artificial sense of "specialness".

This isn't even a recent phenomenon - I remember certain Mac users' reactions when Apple announced a PC version of the iPod for chrissakes. The stereotype of Apple users having a particularly strong level of.. ahem.. "brand loyalty".. has been well earned over the course of at least two decades.

As the saying goes, if the $150 designer sock fits, wear it.

Thanks for helping to make my point (along with several other posters in this thread).
My pleasure.
 
I think there is a standard for Bluetooth file transfers, it's crazy slow though. AirDrop is unique in, even if the two devices are not on the same wifi network, they will negotiate and create a temporary ad-hoc wifi network between them. I wonder if Google has replicated this part of the protocol? Or is it wifi only on the same network, bluetooth otherwise?
 
As a frequent user of AirDrop, I'm surprised they got this to work. AirDrop on Apple devices in any but the simplest of situations is prone to failure. (I have six iPhones all with different iCloud accounts.) Half the time I end up sending things via text instead of AirDrop. Apple should allow this and then make AirDrop an official standard that actually works all the time.
 
Anyone remember when Apple announced FaceTime, that they would make it an open standard?

Honestly though, the question is can they fix it without breaking backwards compatibility with older devices? How much of what AirDrop does is based on open standards and Apple has just strung them together in a unique way? If they change it, do they risk breaking how reliable/stable it is?

How much do they really care? There are apps and devices that have had AirPlay support outside of Apple's ecosystem and official licensing for years. Apple has never tried to shut that down that I know of. I can't think of a reason they would treat AirDrop any different.
 
This is a test.

If Apple blocks it, Google will sue and then the USA will begin their process to open up the iOS ecosystem just like the EU and other regions.

*it's a trap meme*
 
No, it's not. It's Google reverse engineering the standard. But it will be if Apple does something, so they might not.
It is a result of the EU... Previously, Apple used a proprietary protocol called Apple Wireless Direct Link (AWDL) for this and other continuity features. The EU required Apple to use interoperable wireless standards starting with iOS 26, and deprecate AWDL. Without the EU requiring this change, this wouldn't have been possible by Google.

The rulings required Apple to add support for the Wi-Fi Alliance’s Wi-Fi Aware standard instead of AWDL—and in fact required Apple to deprecate AWDL and to help add its features to Wi-Fi Aware so that any device could benefit from them. This wasn’t quite the imposition it sounded like; Wi-Fi Aware was developed with Apple’s help, based on the work Apple had already done on AWDL. But it meant that Apple could no longer keep other companies out of AirDrop by using a functionally similar but private communication protocol instead of the standardized version.

So to answer the title of this article... No, I don't think Apple will try to stop it since they were required to use a standard that allows for interoperability.
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: gusmula and strongy
100% agree, yet it’s hilarious that they think that iPhones are somehow elite or exclusive. You can pick up one at wal-mart for $200 out the door with no payments, or on mint, etc.
I've been working on a specific theory that anyone who thinks iPhones are exclusive or elite either aren't the most knowledgeable about wealth and what it means to be wealthy or they're out of touch and don't realize how accessible Apple products (or electronics in general) are even for people in poverty.

Every time I've seen someone complaining about iPhones or Macs on the topic of being elite it's someone who falls into those camps. So many people who assume the poor person with an iPhone must've bought the most expensive phone instead of getting food that I had to start ignoring them.

Either way, count me in on the people who want a easy built-in option for Android and iOS/Mac users to send files. Add it on Windows too, anything to make things easier when sending documents and pics between devices.
 
I have zero doubt that Google has figured out how IMessage could easily work with Google Messages as well, especially now a full year+ after the RCS interoperability.

Backed by the EU, and Apple using Google as its base for AI, Google has the upper hand now in negotiations for this sort of thing.

The AirDrop interoperability drop today is a tria balloon for bringing IMessage into the mix too.
 
Why is anyone here *against* interoperability like this? I've so often wanted to AirDrop something to my Android friends and been frustrated that it's not possible. This is a GOOD thing with zero downside to us users.
If Google is exploiting a vulnerability, then that vulnerability should be patched.

If they aren't, then there's no reason for Apple to change anything and its all good.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.