Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think they’ll hold prices at $999 for the base Pro, but once the 20th anniversary edition comes out they’ll raise it at that time (like with the iPhone X). Then going forward that will be the new Pro base price.
The prices of everything has gone up in the last few years and you expect Apple to keep maintaining the $999 starting price, got it.

$1099 almost comes across as $10.99 or $1.99 to the psychological consumer mind. $1199 would be pushing it. Same reason why products sale prices end in $XX.99 or from a range of $XX.95. Apple can absorb it by would their and for how long?
 
If this was so easy then Apple would have been producing other components in-house and manufacturing it as well.
I didn’t say it would be easy. But it would be easier than building an Apple Car. Costs will keep rising and eventually the prices of devices will become unaffordable. Better to start getting a handle on it now.
 
I didn’t say it would be easy. But it would be easier than building an Apple Car. Costs will keep rising and eventually the prices of devices will become unaffordable. Better to start getting a handle on it now.
To believe that initial acquisition costs to setup and run an AI data end will continue indefinite is folly. Yes, equipment upgrades happen in sections not all at once and the demand to operate said replacement may slowdown or just shrink. The future is uncertain and no point in stressing over it.
 
I don't know about existing iPhone products but, even without memory prices, Apple will raise prices on new products.
When component prices dropped in the past does Apple adjust pricing? Short answer; no. When prices go up, Apple raises it slower than anyone else in the market because it leverages these well in advance. Apple is merely taking a hit on its profit margin not bottom line, it will survive until next iPhone release.
 
How does this work for the System on a Chip that Apple uses? TSMC gets the individual unpackaged DRAM chips from another vendor and combines them with the CPU to create one device that is then attached to the system board? Why can’t TSMC just do all of that themselves for their SoC clients?
 
How does this work for the System on a Chip that Apple uses? TSMC gets the individual unpackaged DRAM chips from another vendor and combines them with the CPU to create one device that is then attached to the system board? Why can’t TSMC just do all of that themselves for their SoC clients?

Because the transistors are very different and optimized for different purposes.

It's like asking why a John Deere factory can't suddenly assemble BYD electric busses. Just because they have four wheels doesn't mean they're the same.

A DRAM (e.g. CMXT) fab is very different in terms of equipment, chemical inputs, R&D, economics, etc. compared to a logic fab (TSMC). And a NAND fab is very different from DRAM fabs.

Each of these are very different multi-billion dollar businesses. TSMC is specialized in pure-play logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MNGR and marte91
Remember ....those who think Apple will raise the price...also you all said Apple will raise the prices when everybody else did 3-4 years ago and Apple still kept the 999 starting on pro iphones prices and on macs even lower the prices
we can only hope.
 
If Apple does, will they also drop prices when the AI bubble bursts and chip prices crater?

(We all know the answer to that. Point is Apple needs to play ahead, like they used to, and not trap themselves in a corner over short/mid-term pricing.)
 


There has been a lot of discussion lately about skyrocketing memory chip prices, and how that might impact the iPhone and other Apple devices.

iPhone-17-Pro-Colors.jpg

For those who are not caught up to speed, prices for both DRAM and NAND storage chips have been surging lately due to increased demand from companies building out AI servers. Nvidia has reportedly surpassed Apple as chipmaker TSMC's biggest customer as a result of this boom, despite record-breaking iPhone sales last quarter.

The demand for memory chips for AI servers is so high right now that reports have indicated that chipmakers such as TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix cannot keep up with supply despite operating at or near full capacity. This supply-demand imbalance is allowing for chipmakers to raise prices for memory chips, with Taiwanese research firm TrendForce today estimating that conventional DRAM and NAND contract prices could rise up to 90–95% and up to 55-60% this quarter, respectively, compared to last quarter.

Apple surely still has plenty of leverage as one of the world's largest consumer electronics makers, but it is not entirely immune to the pricing situation.

On an earnings call last week, Apple CEO Tim Cook acknowledged that the rising chip prices will have a "bit more of an impact" on the company's gross margin in the current quarter. Nevertheless, Apple forecasted that its revenue will rise 13% to 16% in the quarter on a year-over-year basis, so the company still expects growth.

Cook said Apple "will look at a range of options to deal with" the rising prices, if necessary, but he did not mention any specific plans.

While the situation is rapidly evolving, it seems unlikely for now that one of those measures would be raising iPhone prices, for a few reasons.

First, Apple forecasted that its overall gross margin will remain strong at 48% to 49% in the current quarter, so the company is managing for now.

Second, Taiwanese supply chain publication DigiTimes today reported that some suppliers expect Apple to intensify its cost-cutting demands going forward. It is unclear if this refers to DRAM and NAND chip suppliers, or if Apple will try to negotiate more favorable deals with suppliers of other components to offset the impact.

Apple has historically been extremely sensitive about passing on price increases to customers, and it is known to have excellent supply chain management.

In line with that, supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo recently said that Apple's current plan for the iPhone 18 Pro models later this year is to "avoid raising prices as much as possible." He predicted that Apple will "at least keep the starting price flat," suggesting that iPhone 18 Pro models will not cost more than iPhone 17 Pro models.

Kuo was specifically commenting on starting prices, so it remains to be seen if Apple increases the prices of its already-overpriced storage upgrade options.

Related Reading: Apple May Break a 10-Year Chip Strategy

Article Link: Will Apple Raise iPhone Prices Due to Skyrocketing Memory Chip Prices?
Are the price rises due to Bitcoin mining, Data centers, something else, or all of them?
 
If Apple does, will they also drop prices when the AI bubble bursts and chip prices crater?

(We all know the answer to that. Point is Apple needs to play ahead, like they used to, and not trap themselves in a corner over short/mid-term pricing.)
They will charge whatever the market will bear. The only lever we have to pull there is to not buy what they're selling at the price they've set for it.
 
Nobody wants all this AI garbage and yet the entire world has to suffer for it. Absolutely insane.
Many people are resistant to new things, and are resistant to AI as well, without having a reason. It will continue to become a part of people's everyday lives, including those who claim today that they don't want it.
Please note that Aleh wrote “AI garbage”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B4U
I agree but to me the 17 Pro Max I bought feels just as premium as the 11 Pro… 🤷
Really?? I have a 17 Pro on order, I hope it feels significantly better than the 15 I had, the aluminum build on that combined with the matte back felt pretty cheap, and it was tough to hold onto, sans case, without any polished surfaces
 
Nobody wants all this AI garbage and yet the entire world has to suffer for it. Absolutely insane.
When we start seeing shortages of phones, cars, appliances etc. die to the AI bubble perhaps things will turn a corner…
 
100%, I’d rather pay more and have better quality
I concur.

The natural titanium iPhone 16 Pro Max is as beautiful and premium as advertised by Apple.

Yet just one year later Apple’s hypocrisy is on display as they got cheap, downgrading the 17 Pro Max to cheap aluminum while attempting to convince buyers that it’s better than titanium. If that’s true why did they choose titanium in the first place?

However Apples marketing power and influence over their buyers causes most of them to believe and buy whatever Apple sells.
 
I just hope they dont start cheaping out on other components in the phone to offset the cost. Cheaper batteries, slower storage, lower quality display etc..

Im wanting to upgrade to the 18 pro since im still on the 14 but I'll definitely hold off to make sure there isn't something obvious that they cut corners on with the phone
The iPhone 17 and 17 Pro felt like as good as it's going to get for a while so my wife and I upgraded.

Anything can happen, obviously, but I don't see this getting better soon and I can't see Apple absorbing these price increases either. So I thought it was very likely they would either lower the cost or raise the price. Time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sleep/to/dream
One thing that is nice about the Safari browser in iOS you have the option to hide something distracting, so I always hide that AI modules that try to appear in search results. 😛
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.