If you can't afford one, don't buy one, but don't whine on here. I'm tired of the cost posts... "suck it up"!
Then consider this a value rant
YMMV, but its not about the cost, but the question of if it represents a good value. They're not the same concept.
YMMV, but an iPhone doesn't rank particularly high on my personal list. Part of the reason why is because I've had a Blackberry 7100g for the past 3 years and I have seen the novelty of the smart phone features run its course.
Sure, some aspects of the BB are, admittedly, nice-to-have, but if my work stopped paying for it tomorrow, I'd probably not be willing to pay for it on my own: technolgically, I've found that it is "Interesting, but not particularly compelling", in no small part due to the relatively high cost premium that celluar Service providers are demanding. The situation reminds me of automakers who for years have insisted that you buy a useless option (remember vinyl roofs?) to get an option that you really want (today: want HID headlights? Must buy the optional leather interior + "convenience package" + etc).
What it ultimately comes down to is that no matter how much money we make, our financial resources are still finite, and thus our discretionary spending budget is finite too.
There's always a list of "wants" competing for these discretionary resources (YMMV....my personal list includes a new Mac Pro and a new underwater dSLR camera system), so the iPhone has to compete against these other items in terms of its overall personal desirability & priority, which I personally do by their "bang for the buck" value, not their mere cost.
If you wish to buy based on just cost, be my guest, but it has been my experience that this approach invariably results in lots of 'cheap' stuff, and you never get the money together to buy any of the big ticket items.
-hh