pfffft light weightguess we are showing off age 🙂 - I once had a 80386(DX) computer and added a match coprocessor (80387). It was da bomb until the 486 came out some time later 🙁
I had one of those - coco. 4k of ram, made programming challenging 🙂Mine. I still have downstairs somewhere in storage. The only storage it had was tape based storage with an option cassette tape recorder that sat next to it. I have that somewhere here too.
LOL, and here I was thinking that I would never hear the word "math coprocessor" again, LOL!guess we are showing off age 🙂 - I once had a 80386(DX) computer and added a match coprocessor (80387). It was da bomb until the 486 came out some time later 🙁
HIMEM.SYSThe main thing I remember about MS-DOS was switching the expanded and extended memory around to play Command and Conquer LOL.
oh the memories that invokes trying to get wing commander to run (not just that game, but you get the point).HIMEM.SYS
EMM386.EXE
AFAIK DX meant the mathematical coprocessor was already included in the main processor, SX, in turn, denoted the version without coprocessor.LOL, and here I was thinking that I would never hear the word "math coprocessor" again, LOL!
Totally. You were ballin' here if you have over 128mb HDD.AFAIK DX meant the mathematical coprocessor was already included in the main processor, SX, in turn, denoted the version without coprocessor.
My first computer was an IBM PC AT (286). The case looked similar to maflynn's 5150, which was its ancestor (2 generations earlier). It was subsequently upgraded with the 386DX33 mainboard plus 8MB RAM (8 individual sticks). The hard drive was updated from app. 30 MB to two ones of 128 MB (Seagate) and 300 MB (Maxtor).
that begun in the 486... the 386 be it DX or SX required an external chip for math (the 387)AFAIK DX meant the mathematical coprocessor was already included in the main processor, SX, in turn, denoted the version without coprocessor.
My first computer was an IBM PC AT (286). The case looked similar to maflynn's 5150, which was its ancestor (2 generations earlier). It was subsequently upgraded with the 386DX33 mainboard plus 8MB RAM (8 individual sticks). The hard drive was updated from app. 30 MB to two ones of 128 MB (Seagate) and 300 MB (Maxtor).
FWIW, the original Compaq Deskpro 386 motherboard only supported the 80287, with the '287 clocked at 8MHz. Compaq offered a motherboard swap for those when the 80387s started shipping and these had the '387 clocked at 16MHz.that begun in the 486... the 386 be it DX or SX required an external chip for math (the 387)
DX meant 32-bit external bus, SX was 16-bit
Until very recently, Japanese businesses (I think) needed to file their tax on floppy disk.I'm pretty sure that the disk drives are no longer being made as manufacture of floppy disks ended years ago. I bought a USB 3.5" floppy drive 15 to 20 years ago that is still working - have it plugged into one of the USB-A ports on the back of my Thunderbolt display. Said display is driven by an M4 Pro Mini.
This was my first, then amiga A500, then a bunch of PCs until 2009.Since we are talking about first computers.
Mine. I still have downstairs somewhere in storage. The only storage it had was tape based storage with an option cassette tape recorder that sat next to it. I have that somewhere here too.
![]()
I'm not sure if it was tax documents, it might have been some other form of documentation that had to be filed on floppy disk. The important point was that it had to be filed on floppy disks. The scarcity of floppy disks made for a strong incentive to change that requirement.Until very recently, Japanese businesses (I think) needed to file their tax on floppy disk.
The Coco was also able to run Microware's OS-9 (not to be confused with MacOS 9), which supported multitasking in 64K. The Apple 1 was designed to use either the 6502 or the 6800, wonder how much microcomputer history would have changed if the Apple II used the 6800 and later upgrading to the 6809? Then again, another "what-if" is what would have changed if Zilog got the Z-800 sampling in late 1979, which would provided a simple upgrade path for CP/M machines.The Coco was a pretty under-rated machine. 6809 in it which was far more advanced than the much cheaper 6502 in the Apple II, C64, etc.
Yeah I remember that. I was amazed at how I could run a multitasking system on a dual floppy system with 64kThe Coco was also able to run Microware's OS-9 (not to be confused with MacOS 9), which supported multitasking in 64K.
Don't forget tape drives. We used those during the 80's when I worked as a computer tech for NCR Corp (cassette) and Wang Labs (large reel to reel) both in midrange systems and PC's. During the mid to late 80's we had switched to portable tape drives that was the faster way of updating an operating system.I'm not sure if it was tax documents, it might have been some other form of documentation that had to be filed on floppy disk. The important point was that it had to be filed on floppy disks. The scarcity of floppy disks made for a strong incentive to change that requirement.
FWIW, I've had 8", 5.25" and 3.5" floppy drives with the computers I've owned.
Updating the OS has changed a lot over the years, in the early days the update was booting off a newer OS floppy, then multiple floppies to update the OS on the hard drive, to CD/DVD-ROM's and now downloading. With the size of update packages, having gigabit internet access comes in handy.
I remember using this back in 1989-90 or thereabouts . Had a IBM PS/2 (think it was a PS/2 30) in my office with it installed . Saved me a ton of time and frustration . At that time , it seemed almost magical .Who here remembers or used Desqview ? A Dos based multitasking system - coupled with Qemm, it turned your system into a potent machine
View attachment 2618429
View attachment 2618430
In all honesty, I really wanted one of those. I was semi-tempted to pick one up on ebay a few months ago. I also wanted to do the same for an IBM PC 5150, but spending money for something that will largely just collect dust didn't make good financial sense to me.Had a IBM PS/2
A while back , I wanted to get my hands on one of the AIO PS/2 models (25 and (I think) 40). The school district I worked for bought them by the hundreds . Always thought they were a nice design . But , like you , I couldn't see putting out the cash for something that would just occupy shelf space .In all honesty, I really wanted one of those. I was semi-tempted to pick one up on ebay a few months ago. I also wanted to do the same for an IBM PC 5150, but spending money for something that will largely just collect dust didn't make good financial sense to me.