CubaTBird said:I was browsing threads at hard ocp and stumbled across this.
![]()
Jalexster said:NO! Don't do it! Don't install it! Don't ruin a beautiful Mac with a horrible Spyware infected Operating System!
Tell that to whoever had the disc. And if anyone else out there had a Windows disc that is claimed to install on a PowerPc processor, well, look at my first paragraph.
Or maybe it's saying that it can be installed on a PowerPC processor running inside an IBM computer. Actully, that is most likely.
NusuniAdmin said:nope that is definitly saying ppc computer. Meaning a regular old mac.
NusuniAdmin said:nope that is definitly saying ppc computer. Meaning a regular old mac.
Duff-Man says....I can confirm what Slughead has said....this NT version never did and never will install on a "regular mac." It was made for IBM's PowerPC computers - different beasts than Apple's PowerPC based Macintosh computers....nothing to see here folks...old stuff that someone digs out once in a blue moon....oh yeah!NusuniAdmin said:nope that is definitly saying ppc computer. Meaning a regular old mac.
Nermal said:I have one of those CDs somewhere and can confirm that it doesn't work on a Mac. Notice that it says 'Windows NT-compatible PowerPC,' not just 'PowerPC.'
Brother Michael said:Wasn't there a version of MS-DOS that ran on the Mac? I remember back about 7-8 years ago in Middle school, we had a lot of Mac's that booted up between OS 8 and DOS and I *think* Windows 3.11
Mike
NusuniAdmin said:Yes i know. THats why i said old mac. Some of the older macs came with a special card that made it compatable with this nt version![]()
Alpha is, not was, a processor line. The people who own them swear by Alpha-based computers. Many people who don't have them, want them. The problem with Alpha is not that it never took off. It took off quite nicely, thank you. My employer's enterprise computing runs on an Alpha-based cluster. The problem with Alpha has to do with corporate politics. Alpha was developed by DEC. It was primarily a mid-range processor, but not exclusively. One of my former supervisors bought several Alpha-based DEC pizza boxes running Win NT.tomf87 said:Yeah, we had an old IBM RS/5000 or RS/6000 running NT 4.0. And from what I understand the Alpha line of computers were screamingly fast compared to x86, but they never took off.
jhu said:you're probably thinking of the dos card, which would make it run the x86 version of windows nt. the ppc version ran on ibm's rs/6000 machines.
MisterMe said:Alpha is, not was, a processor line. The people who own them swear by Alpha-based computers. Many people who don't have them, want them. The problem with Alpha is not that it never took off. It took off quite nicely, thank you. .....
And this matters how? The Xbox development system's host OS is not a commercial product. It most likely does not include the embedded version of SoftWindows that allowed the PPC port of NT to run Intel binaries. There are no recent commercial PPC binaries for NT. If you are an Xbox games developer, then this is the OS for you. Otherwise, move along. There is nothing to see here.superbovine said:http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14407
The big news to us is that the XBOX 2 SDK has been seeded to developers on dual Apple Power Mac G5 systems running a custom Windows NT Kernel.
There is even a newer kernel than that![]()