Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The real problem with windows pc:s are the absolut crap displays. We use Dell at work and you have to really fork out money to get anything decent. Otherwise you're stuck with 1920x1200 regardless of size (16" 1920x1200 is a joke, the pixels are pinhead-sized). And if you're lucky, you get 400Nits. And this is on enterprise-grade Dell laptops costing substantially more than a MacBook Air.
Funniest thing I heard today at work was that this does not matter. Most PC-users only use their laptops once in a while, otherwise they stay docked to a monitor (which, btw, usually is a 24" 1920x1200 300Nits Dell) so they don't care about the screen quality.
I just kept my mouth shut, but thought to myself: yeah, or they stay docked since they have zero battery life and the screen hurts to look at so nobody wants to use them as laptops unless forced to.
Agreed. I have a Lenovo work PC, and I don’t remember the spec exactly but it is specced to be higher brightness than my Air. Yet, at my preferred location for home work, which is a pretty bright room, I can easily see what is on screen on the Air running off battery, but struggle on the Lenovo even plugged in. Don’t trust the specs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing? Also, I seriously doubt that thing will have more battery life than the Neo with an Intel chip, unless it's so underpowered you can only do 1 thing at a time.
Don't Apple say similar in terms of more hours for video playback than web browsing?

e.g. MacBook Air:
Up to 18 hours video streaming
Up to 15 hours wireless web

(But yes - there is no way I will believe battery life estimates for Windows/Intel laptops.)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-05-30 at 09.37.12.png
    Screenshot 2026-05-30 at 09.37.12.png
    147.9 KB · Views: 39
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
IT nerds are historically pathetic at understanding how normal people see computers.
This is sooo true. It's the classic early adopters > mass market thing. They typically have completely different purchasing priorities.

Even all of us here are not Apple's majority customers, they stopped being a niche a long time ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Speak to anyone who works in IT sales and they’ll tell you Acer are the least reliable PC manufacturer on the planet.

Indeed... but regardless of the usual throwing with "specs" in PC-land, all the "power" will always be obliterated with the pre-installed Windows OS - as it always was in the last +25 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ctrlos and 3Gmatt
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing? Also, I seriously doubt that thing will have more battery life than the Neo with an Intel chip, unless it's so underpowered you can only do 1 thing at a time.
I think it's right--Apple often used "iTunes video playback times" most prominently, as that test posted the best battery life. I remember the Haswell Airs that would get 13 hours of battery life--Phil Schiller bombed on stage when he said "You can watch the entire Black Knight trilogy on your flight." He meant to say, Dark Knight.
 
Whenever a PC laptop maker makes a cheap laptop, there’s always at least one thing (and often multiple things) that make the product practically unusable.

And of course, they start hobbled by Windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Say what you want about Windows, and I agree partly of your point, File Explorer is simply better than Finder tbh. And this is coming from someone who uses both macOS and Windows.
Have you use File Explorer on Windows 11 lately?
Finder does the job, there are thrid party file managers if you want something different.

i have a third party file manager on Windows.
I dumped Windows as my main Os 3 years ago when I changed to Mac and I am still glad I did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus and jonahj
True. I hadn't considered the web without content blockers.
Even if you block all ads HTML and benign scripts are surprisingly taxing on the CPU, and general computing is more power hungry than video decoding which is handled by efficient dedicated ASICs
 
Prefer to use macOS, so I would buy a Neo. But competition is very good and will result in manufactures coming up with good products.
That's one of the reasons I'm glad Apple released the Neo. Windows laptops/Chromebooks in that price range vary from decent to terrible. They have so many compromises in cheap materials, cheap components, etc. that they are sometimes painful to use (only mildly hyperbolic with that claim). Apple setting a little fire under the other companies making laptops is a good thing.
 
That's one of the reasons I'm glad Apple released the Neo. Windows laptops/Chromebooks in that price range vary from decent to terrible. They have so many compromises in cheap materials, cheap components, etc. that they are sometimes painful to use (only mildly hyperbolic with that claim). Apple setting a little fire under the other companies making laptops is a good thing.

It’s astonishing how many people don’t think like you two. I don’t use a Mac (because I use a computer predominantly to game) but I was very happy when the Neo launched, because I knew a lot of PC manufacturers would respond and it results in better quality midrange laptops for everyone.
 
Thats is a good Acer laptop but the problem is not hardware but software that runs on it. The most is windows witch is frustrating to use in last days so the experience is bad at the end.
 
The real problem with windows pc:s are the absolut crap displays. We use Dell at work and you have to really fork out money to get anything decent. Otherwise you're stuck with 1920x1200 regardless of size (16" 1920x1200 is a joke, the pixels are pinhead-sized). And if you're lucky, you get 400Nits. And this is on enterprise-grade Dell laptops costing substantially more than a MacBook Air.
Funniest thing I heard today at work was that this does not matter. Most PC-users only use their laptops once in a while, otherwise they stay docked to a monitor (which, btw, usually is a 24" 1920x1200 300Nits Dell) so they don't care about the screen quality.
I just kept my mouth shut, but thought to myself: yeah, or they stay docked since they have zero battery life and the screen hurts to look at so nobody wants to use them as laptops unless forced to.
I see lots of problems with your viewpoint. First, comparing Apple to "windows pc's" is completely unfair as there are dozen's of Windows laptop manufacturers and then there is Apple. Your work chose to buy Dell -- first mistake. They have become a complete rip-off lately. It's not hard to find an affordable laptop with a 3K 120Hz OLED panel, unless you're shopping Apple then you can't.

It sounds like you're disappointed in Dell but then blame all Windows PC's for Dell using crappy parts and overcharging for the better stuff.
 
The main problem with pc laptops is windows, is Microsoft has been unforgivably lazy at bringing windows into the 21st century.

From a ux pov there are gobs of older ui still hanging around from previous versions of windows.

Copy files in windows explorer and you’ll get a (non dark mode) windows 8 era ui spring up.

Control panel is still hanging around despite there being a settings app since windows 10.

Much of the ui is in a web view - even the start menu - instead of the faster native ui.

Outlook app is a wrapper for the outlook web app. Microsoft can’t even be bothered to make and maintain a native consumer and pro outlook any more.

The list goes on.

It’s the sheer uncaring sloppiness ‘oh this will do’ attitude that Microsoft seems to have that pervades windows 11.

It should not take too much effort for Microsoft to polish windows 11 and make it a product that that can be proud of and users would enjoy using.

Belatedly with their k2 modernisation project they seem to be trying to turn things around. But only because even windows advocates are down on what Microsoft has done - or more has not done - to windows.

We rightly criticise Apple over its misguided changes to macOS - Liquid Glass - but let’s all be thankful that things are not nearly as bad as they are for win 11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huge_apple_fangirl
I see lots of problems with your viewpoint. First, comparing Apple to "windows pc's" is completely unfair as there are dozen's of Windows laptop manufacturers and then there is Apple. Your work chose to buy Dell -- first mistake. They have become a complete rip-off lately. It's not hard to find an affordable laptop with a 3K 120Hz OLED panel, unless you're shopping Apple then you can't.

It sounds like you're disappointed in Dell but then blame all Windows PC's for Dell using crappy parts and overcharging for the better stuff.
Sorry, but this is just wrong.
It is NOT easy to find enterprise grade laptops with 3K 120Hz OLED. That is a very, very expensive option on very select workstation grade laptops, if you can even get it.

When purchasing for large organisations, there are lots of other stuff on the list of requirements: 3 year on-site warranty, "keep your hard drive", longer model lifecycles, precofigurable BIOS and loads of other stuff.
What is offered on consumer-grade gaming laptops does not in any way or form compare with enterprise-grade laptops.

4K screen is offered on Dell Pro Precision 16". The only 3K screen is on the old Latitude 7350.
HP offers 2.8K on the pricey EliteBook X, Ultra G1 and ZBook Ultra G1.
Lenovo offeres 3K on Thinkpad T1g, P14s and P16
None of these laptops starts below $3K and I don't think any of them have OLED.
 
Sorry, but this is just wrong.
It is NOT easy to find enterprise grade laptops with 3K 120Hz OLED. That is a very, very expensive option on very select workstation grade laptops, if you can even get it.

When purchasing for large organisations, there are lots of other stuff on the list of requirements: 3 year on-site warranty, "keep your hard drive", longer model lifecycles, precofigurable BIOS and loads of other stuff.
What is offered on consumer-grade gaming laptops does not in any way or form compare with enterprise-grade laptops.

4K screen is offered on Dell Pro Precision 16". The only 3K screen is on the old Latitude 7350.
HP offers 2.8K on the pricey EliteBook X, Ultra G1 and ZBook Ultra G1.
Lenovo offeres 3K on Thinkpad T1g, P14s and P16
None of these laptops starts below $3K and I don't think any of them have OLED.
oh, sorry...I thought we were talking about your comment regarding the Neo and Windows PC's...is the Neo now an Enterprise MacBook?

You brought up buying Dell at work and I agreed with you that their stuff lately is not a value proposition and everything has huge profit margins on them.

But talking about Windows PC vs the Neo (this article), which is what I believe you were talking about with your comment "windows pc:s are the absolut crap displays", then look around -- tons of deals for people to get a 3K 120Hz OLED on a ASUS, Acer, Lenovo, etc. While there are some "crap displays" there are also lots of top-of-the-line displays (better than MacBook and definitely better than Neo) on many, many Windows laptops.
 
I’ve got a MacBook Air M2, and a 2013 MacBook Pro, and never had a beachball. If you’re “regularly” having beachballs on an M5, then you should send your computer back, it’s got problems.
There’s nothing wrong with the hardware, Finder just sucks, and the search function reminds me of Windows 95 in how bad it is.
 
oh, sorry...I thought we were talking about your comment regarding the Neo and Windows PC's...is the Neo now an Enterprise MacBook?

You brought up buying Dell at work and I agreed with you that their stuff lately is not a value proposition and everything has huge profit margins on them.

But talking about Windows PC vs the Neo (this article), which is what I believe you were talking about with your comment "windows pc:s are the absolut crap displays", then look around -- tons of deals for people to get a 3K 120Hz OLED on a ASUS, Acer, Lenovo, etc. While there are some "crap displays" there are also lots of top-of-the-line displays (better than MacBook and definitely better than Neo) on many, many Windows laptops.
MacBook Neo is included in ACE, why would it not be a enterprise choise? Never mind the Neo, the Air is way better than the vast majority of enterprise PCs, at a lower price. You'll be hard pressed to find an enterprise PC from any manufacturer with a better screen than a Neo or Air both in resolution and brightness at that price point (not mentioning battery life and performance).

Like I stated quite clearly: an enterprise windows PC is _not_ just any windows PC. The manufacturers that we (15000 employees) consider up to standards are Dell, HP and maybe Lenovo (and Apple!). ASUS and Acer are off the table.
 
This laptop will:

A) have a screen that wobbles for 30 seconds after you touch the keyboard
B) be able to heat your bedroom in the winter
C) Sound like a jet taking off
D) have such bad speakers that you’ll need subtitles on all your videos
E) all of the above
So you have one. Tell us in detail about it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.