Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What is left to charge? My laptop lasts a really long time. I could never need to charge it even daily. My iPad can last days as well. My iphone 6 easily lasts through even my longest day. Charging these devices is easy and done during down time. I still need to sleep for hours every day. I can get my charging done then. It is a minor inconvenience. Though it is a daily issue still.

My older devices aren't so energy efficient. But I'm going to replace them in fairly short order.

If they can make this device and get it to work, that would be a game changer. But lots of my charging issues are falling away. Though I suspect I might soon have another charging device in the form of an Apple Watch. So that might be another issue for me. Oh well.

What is left to charge? There can never be enough charge. I can very heavily drain my late-2014 MacBook in just a few hours, and prior to that when I used my iPhone 6 as my primary device it would only last because I could charge it while driving to and fro. I even carry a constantly charged battery pack in my car for those days where I have to step away from my normal outlets.
 
#1 reason why I want wireless charging on iOS devices: So I don't have to worry about the dreaded "this accessory is uncertified" (or whatever) error that shows up even with certified accessories/cables. I'd just stick every device on one mat instead of dealing with various cables that may work.

Seriously, the Lightning cables' restrictions are about on the BS level of DRM-protected HDMI. This shouldn't even be legal.
 
Last edited:
I love how, before Apple adopts it, it's not mainstream. And as soon as Apple starts using it, it's "mainstream".

I've had wireless charging in my cellphone for over 2 years, and console's have been doing it for even longer. It's already mainstream, and most non-Apple high-end cellphones already have it as an option.

Yes....it must be anointed by The Apple before the world recognises it as mainstream !
 
I love how, before Apple adopts it, it's not mainstream. And as soon as Apple starts using it, it's "mainstream".

I've had wireless charging in my cellphone for over 2 years, and console's have been doing it for even longer. It's already mainstream, and most non-Apple high-end cellphones already have it as an option.

I don't know about this. At least the Samsung Galaxy does not.

----------

What about security, not only will you be charging your devices but both neighbours as well!

Ha, maybe they'll think of a way to "encrypt" wireless electricity.
 
I don't believe this...

then again, if someone told me I can visually talk to someone in real time on the side of the planet whenever I want in the palm of my hands for free, I would have not believed him either
 
It's at this point where an iWatch becomes practicable. Can't see the point of removing a device every night. This is the real game changer for me.
 
I work on the iOS app for http://www.chargifi.com they are installing Rezence in loads of places in 2015 across the globe.

A lot of handset manufactures use the Qi standard but Rezence is a superior technology. It will be interesting to see what Apple use in the iWatch.
 
I have a qi wireless charger for my phone now and it's great! It's on my night stand. I just put my phone on it at night and it's ready to go in the morning. No fumbling with cables that fall behind the night stand. If I want to check something I can just pick it up. No plugging and unplugging. Admittedly I kind of didn't see the point until I had one.

Exactly. After getting the Nexus 7 2013 just for fun (because of the unbeatable price) while still using my iPads as main tablets, I quickly fell in love with Qi.

Wireless charging was one of the (many) reasons I've gone for the Note 4 (with the S-View Qi flip case) instead of the much-much less capable iPhone 6. It's so much easier to just put the phone on the charger surface instead of having to plug in the cable.
 
I am yet to see the advantages of wireless charging. To wireless charge your phone you have to place it on a table (or similar)... just like normal charging with a cable. :rolleyes:

Until you can charge a phone from a distance, I don't see that technology being any better than wire charging. Actually I remember Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) complaining about Nexus 6's wireless charging because he had to place the phone at a specific position so that it could be wireless charged, otherwise it wouldn't work.

I don't think wireless charging is going to be big until it can be done at a distance, say two meters. I want to sit at my desk with my phone in my pocket and it is charging because I have a gadget sitting on my desk that is doing it at a distance. I want to be sleeping while wearing my smart watch and it's charging because I have a gadget on the nightstand. And I want my electric car in my garage to be charging because I have a gadget on the garage floor or wall.


This.
 
Last edited:
I love how, before Apple adopts it, it's not mainstream. And as soon as Apple starts using it, it's "mainstream".

I've had wireless charging in my cellphone for over 2 years, and console's have been doing it for even longer. It's already mainstream, and most non-Apple high-end cellphones already have it as an option.

Nobody said that...what console uses wireless charging?

----------

I am yet to see the advantages of wireless charging. To wireless charge your phone you have to place it on a table (or similar)... just like normal charging with a cable. :rolleyes:

Until you can charge a phone from a distance, I don't see that technology being any better than wire charging. Actually I remember Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) complaining about Nexus 6's wireless charging because he had to place the phone at a specific position so that it could be wireless charged, otherwise it wouldn't work.




This.

For what it's worth, I've burned out Lumia batteries in less than 6 months with wireless charging - which tells me it's harder on the hardware.

----------

Exactly. After getting the Nexus 7 2013 just for fun (because of the unbeatable price) while still using my iPads as main tablets, I quickly fell in love with Qi.

Wireless charging was one of the (many) reasons I've gone for the Note 4 (with the S-View Qi flip case) instead of the much-much less capable iPhone 6. It's so much easier to just put the phone on the charger surface instead of having to plug in the cable.

One, how is the iPhone 6 "much much less capable"? What that says to me is that you've never really compared them.

Two, if your Note 4 is in a case, why not get a Qi charging case for iPhone?

----------

Yes....it must be anointed by The Apple before the world recognises it as mainstream !

No no no, it must be chastised by Android fans on Apple related forums first. Android fans who think they know more about technology than hardware developers at Apple. THEN it is recognized as mainstream
 
Wireless charging may be a problem in Asian countries where they believe the current level of EMF from cell towers, residential wifi, charging bricks, microwave oven, hifi equipments, and laptops is considered a form of pollutant
 
I don't know about this. At least the Samsung Galaxy does not.

----------


I used to charge Galaxy S4 with a NFC charger few years back along with Nokia Lumia 920...They sold a charger pad as additional accessory.
 
Great! I waiting for the moment when I can create a bunch of magnetic field around my house! Sound helthy!
 
That's an advancement to an existing technology. It's like if, when Apple announced the retina MacBooks, they did so by saying they were going to make LCD's mainstream. No, they existed for years and were in mainstream use. All they did was upgrade them. Same thing in this instance. The technology is quite impressive, but it's hardly "looking to go" mainstream. The technology is already mainstream.

Wireless charging is in its infant stage. While wireless charging is widely available, the technology discussed here goes past what we are currently using and offers more than just an upgrade to the technology. If WiTricity expanded charging distance from 15 ft to 100 ft, that would be similar to your LCD analogy. Having a transmitter push electricity to multiple devices in a room without cables is not mainstream and that's what WiTricity is going to change.
 
How many sperms does it kill per minute?


Maybe Apple is really going for this :

Nokia-Wireless-Charging-Pillow-v1a-1500x1500-jpg.jpg
 
God I hope so. Would love to see desks with built in wireless power pads so an iMac could theoretically just sit there without any wires whatsoever. That'd be neat.
 
Apple has a patent for 1m wireless charging, and a combined NFC/Wireless charging chip/system. That's what I want.
 
There are peer reviewed medical journals that show magnetic fields cause long term somatic effects. It's all risk vs benefit, I don't see the benefit of this out weighing the risk. Get back to me in 20 years after the technology has been deployed and let's see what the studies say then. :cool:

Citation needed. Let's read them then.

I'll take DOI's or direct links.
 
#1 reason why I want wireless charging on iOS devices: So I don't have to worry about the dreaded "this accessory is uncertified" (or whatever) error that shows up even with certified accessories/cables. I'd just stick every device on one mat instead of dealing with various cables that may work.

Seriously, the Lightning cables' restrictions are about on the BS level of DRM-protected HDMI. This shouldn't even be legal.

"This wireless energy doesn't seem to be certified. You can subscribe to more wireless energy with your credit card. Shutting down your devices in 10..."
 
I am yet to see the advantages of wireless charging. To wireless charge your phone you have to place it on a table (or similar)... just like normal charging with a cable. :rolleyes:

Until you can charge a phone from a distance, I don't see that technology being any better than wire charging. Actually I remember Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) complaining about Nexus 6's wireless charging because he had to place the phone at a specific position so that it could be wireless charged, otherwise it wouldn't work.




This.

That is because you are looking at wireless charging as it exists now, which is slower and requires specific placement. Think about having your desk in the future where the entire surface can be used for charging. You place your watch, laptop, phone, wireless headphones, iPad, etc. on the table and they all charge simultaneously.

Now think about traveling with all those devices (For business, for example.) You don't have to bring a magsafe, mini-USB, lightning, and other cables for every device, the hotel just has a charging desk in your room.

Obviously this is still pretty far off, but wireless charging has to start somewhere.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.