Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
NV? Nope, not a chance anytime soon, seems like Apple *really* holds grudges. AMD? outside possibility but I doubt it personally, Apple seems to want to shift to their own GPUs

That said you'll probably be able to use Asahi Linux with PCIe GPU support at some point and take advantage of the hardware that way :)
Noticed in the video that they said PCI slots “for sound and video I/O”, not “GPU”…
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
Noticed in the video that they said PCI slots “for sound and video I/O”, not “GPU”…
Yes, and MacOS isnt going to support non-Apple GPUs anymore it seems, but other OSes can. The card will still be present on the PCIe bus if you pop it in, MacOS cant do anything with it but Asahi should be able to
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
Still surprised that they updated the Studio to the M2 chips as well. Bloomberg was certain they wouldn't do it (and then they reversed themselves.)

I'm guessing the user base for the Pro towers has shrunk considerably since the heady days of the cheese grater era (which ended with the Trashcan). Back then if you were a video editor or doing "Pro" stuff it was the best bang for the buck, but now the Studio (and even a fully-specced Mini) has so much power that only a fraction of that former user base even needs a tower. Hell, I only need one PCIe card for my work so a Thunderbolt chassis is still a cheaper option.

There were a few vocal folks who insisted that Apple would find a way to incorporate user-upgradable RAM or even allow for external GPUs; it's very clear that Apple has zero interest in making the type of Mac that can be easily upgraded. They don't even provide extra SSD slots on the motherboard. The Pro seems like it's going to become increasingly niche...and eventually irrelevant?
Especially likely when they reduced the complexity & parts of the hardware but ADDED $1000 to the base price…
 
Wow, when did macrumors comments become a cesspool of Apple haters?
A handful of people are throwing legitimate criticism at Apple, instead of being mindless fanboys, and that is “a cesspool of Apple haters” to you. 🤦🏽‍♂️
 
People in general are kinda amped up lately… I blame the pandemic.
Pandemic, AND a toxic culture of hating anyone who isn’t a status quo, lowest-common-denominator “normie”, and it’s being promoted by mainstream media and elected officials.
 
You must be new here. MacRumors forums are probably the most negative against Apple. you can already see that responses to the news announcements are all but 95% negative, sarcastic, and hate filled. It's been this cesspool for several years now.
Not factual. It’s simply the case that there are fewer mindless fanboys, and less tech-geek corporate worship goes on here compared to certain other forums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dogstar
All in all, when it comes to Mac Pro: I suspect it fills the niche it is supposed to fill. People who need internal expansion will be able to move to AS.

Mac Studio is on parity with Mac Pro for performance… I wasn’t expecting this, and frankly I welcome it. Really there isnt any good reason to artificially keep them separated performancewise… Apple can’t cannibalize Mac Pro sales really, they make the money either way…


Now, does the M2 Mac Pro fall short in performance? Reviews will show. Editors should be happy. I am curious if 3d rendering will be alot better then M1 Ultra.
It’s always about the thermals, and almost nobody ever thinks about it unless they’re the small percentage of users who actually run their machines hard. The Mac Studio has worse thermals than the Mac Pro.

The question is, how much worse? Certainly not worse enough that I’m going to even consider a Mac Pro anymore, at this insane price.
 
IMO this "Mac Pro" is really disappointing, but it was predictable...

No upgradeability, just expansion.

Apple could have done something with some kind of sockets or slots for room for more SOC's that would increase the ram, cpu & gpu numbers, or at the very lease an "Extreme" chip that combined 4 of the SOC's vs the Ultra's 2.

Right now its just a Mac Studio with internal expansion. Not really impressed.
But it should have better thermals!
 
You nailed it. It's gotten negative, sarcastic, hate filled, and waaaay more conservative.
Really? The conservatism and libertarian corporate bootlicking is why I left Apple Insider.

It’s always somewhat like that in tech forums (tech geeks seem to not grow out of early life libertarianism like non-tech geeks, especially if they feel like they’re doing well in life), but Macrumors seemed to be moderately better, with less corporate butt-snorkeling and antisocial attitudes.
 
To be fair, they started the transition right when a huge supply chain causing pandemic hit. That screwed timelines everywhere. The main thing I miss with intel is bootcamp. I really really liked being able to boot into windows for those off apps I needed x86 windows for or to play games.
This is what got me back into modern gaming: the used 2017 27” 5K iMac I bought three months ago… which has been abandoned by Mac OS as of Sonoma.
 
192GB of unified memory. That's 192GB for graphics as an example...which before you only had 32GB for each MPX module?
32GB of assured memory for a GPU could be better than shared memory, if the CPU/software is also demanding a lot.
 
The most underwhelming product launched today IMO, apart from the PCI slots, it's no faster or more powerful than the Studio.....then again, I'm no expert and certainly not in the market for this type of product
It SHOULD have better thermals and therefore be able to run at max speed 100% of the time. Who knows if that’s actually the case.
 
And since when does a rack-mountable equipment only has a single power supply and no power management (LOM/IPMI) as the XServe itself had a few years ago?
Do they call "that" "Pro"?
I understand that by "Pro" they must be referring to "Problems". Problems to manage and maintain a "junk" stored in a cabinet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigHit
That’s Tim Cook’s Apple.

Money before design. Money before function. Money before everything.
My feelings exactly. Many of us here could spec the Mac we want and need in a few minutes but Apple will consistently fail to address most users desires. They are big enough and wealthy enough to produce the machine everyone needs but money seems to dominate their thinking. Even if it’s not as cool and efficient as a Mac Pro I will continue to build the PC I want and some elements will certainly be better than any Mac Pro as I can customise far more.
Simply put, I’m tired of waiting for Apple to do the right thing. Others will be happy but I’ve already moved on.
 
But also not worth the development effort with such low volumes. One M2 ultra is at least 16 M2s for MacBook Air or iPad Pro.
The sales volumes would be greater if they didn’t price it stupidly…
 
It’s always about the thermals, and almost nobody ever thinks about it unless they’re the small percentage of users who actually run their machines hard. The Mac Studio has worse thermals than the Mac Pro.

The question is, how much worse? Certainly not worse enough that I’m going to even consider a Mac Pro anymore, at this insane price.
Something I’ve mentioned before: this machine is targeted at corp buyers, not individuals. They arent expecting anyone except a few enthusiasts and a few super wealthy folks to buy this for home or even personal work (that said, a good example of who will: my psychiatrist went from a 6,1 to a 7,1 in 2019 for work and I’d bet will jump to this, he doesnt need it, he just enjoys having one and can afford it) this is aimed at companies buying enterprise hardware for specific types of work

It feels alien right now because it’s basically the only piece of the mac lineup totally aimed at that segment anymore

If i needed this for work IT would have no problem buying it, I spend more at work just for machines on AWS and co per month right now just on compute for me personally (not our actual core infra deployments) than the total cost of this box. If it enables, for its target market, even a small amount of productivity boost for employees companies will spring for it, as far capital costs go in a corp budget it’s cheap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AxiomaticRubric
And now the Mac Pro has officially become an expensive toy. RIP Mac Pro. No real Pro would want it now.
As someone who ACTUALLY configures and buys Mac Pro’s for professionals and companies that need them, I’m going to completely disagree with you. This is a near perfect system for the market they are aimed for, from your comment I’d say that isn’t you!!
 
My theory is the the "extreme" 4x Max chip didn't scale well.. 4x the cost.. and 2.5? x the performance of a max chip based on how poorly the M! ultra scaled. I am curious to see if the M2 Ultra scales way better than the M! ultra did. I couldn't tell from all the apple marketing speak wit they were just comparing the delta in the M2 Ultra too. The Asi Mac Pro is a huge failure.. a massive compromise to get something out the door when plan A, and possibly B failed. I would have rather seen an external GPU option for the Mac Studio than Pay see a $2000 mark up for a big empty Aluminum box to screw over Logic users.
Please remember, lots of Pro users do not need any more extra GPU or CPU performance over what the Ultra offers. Having lots of internal very fast PCIe card support is WAY more important and practical over external much slower Thunderbolt expansion chassis and cable spaghetti. For example, the last few Mac Pro systems I configured for a client had x3 four port 12G SDI cards, x1 Dante audio card, x1 NVMe Raid card and a 25GigE network card installed in addition to the Apple GPU MPX. Firstly, You simply can’t get the required performance from Thunderbolt 4 ports; secondly the mess of extra T4/T3 cables and power cables for the expansion chassis cause reliability, noise and heat issues; lastly all the extra expansion cassis use up additional rack space which is often restricted. The new Mac Pro offers a great solution to those that need it. That said, I do really hope that a future M3, M4 etc allows an ‘Extreme’ version of the family to be produced in the future
 
Yes, and MacOS isnt going to support non-Apple GPUs anymore it seems, but other OSes can. The card will still be present on the PCIe bus if you pop it in, MacOS cant do anything with it but Asahi should be able to
I'm pretty sure no other OSes can either. This isn't Apple refusing to allow it in software... it's a hardware issue with the M1/M2. Asahi Linux has been unable to support eGPUs on Apple Silicon... PCIe slots aren't going to change anything about this.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.