And now the Mac Pro has officially become an expensive toy. RIP Mac Pro. No real Pro would want it now.
With as many Intel Macs as they are dumping support for... yes I think it's safe to assume that. And it really sucks, but I fully expected it.So it’s probably safe to assume macOS Sonoma will be the last to support Intel.
Visual Studio is my main workflowWhat apps do you need to run? Windows 11 ARM is good for productivity apps. Gaming not so much. ARM is making investments in notebook class processors, and Microsoft seems committed to Windows ARM this time around.
Maybe in October/November. But it can happen, that they will just silently update the 24" iMac to the basic M2.iMac event later this year? It's the only Mac stuck on M1 chip. Everything else is on M2
Possibly almost 22 years ago.Wow, when did macrumors comments become a cesspool of Apple haters?
You don't think there's enough room for that heatsink?this took that many years with zero design change? why does Mac Pro need the same giant heatsink? sounds like they messed up with a new design and just said "screw it, we'll just reuse the same old design"
Wouldn't back to school timing be most logical?iMac event later this year? It's the only Mac stuck on M1 chip. Everything else is on M2
They sold intel minis last January.The transition took 3 years (or 2.5 if you count from when they shipped the first M1 Macs). Not too bad considering everything that's gone on the last 3 years.
VNC to mac?Vision Pro if it ran Mac apps, which it doesn't.
I got massively disappointed that they didn't make the SoC modular like we see on the new NVidia Grace CPU. Do you think they will change that in the next interaction?1. i literally worked at Apple as a software engineer. have plenty of evidence to back this up if you want.
2. it doesn't take a hardware genius to see that what they did with Mac Studio shows it's obviously possible to have less of a footprint in terms of cooling architecture for the M2 Ultra in a tower case.
come again?
You misheard, or someone misstated. The 13” Air is by far Apple’s best selling laptop.I was shocked to hear that the 13” MacBook Pro is Apple’s best selling laptop. I bought one when the M2 came out because it had the TouchBar, and I like the form factor better. Even though it’s slightly heavier than the Air, it feels lighter and it looks like Jonny Ive designed it. I find it to be the sleekest of Apple’s laptops. The Airs are fine, but design wise they are merely thin. Square pancake shaped and heavy in hand. However the Midnight color really is beautiful! 😉
When Apple fell off the rails.Wow, when did macrumors comments become a cesspool of Apple haters?
You can never have too many monitors. Never.The "6 Pro XDR Displays" thing really cracks me up. Display technology is so far behind everything else. I mean really....six?! Can't you just make one display that's big enough?
So when it’s decked out at design studios, audio engineering firms, and the likes of Disney/Pixar it’s just a toy?And now the Mac Pro has officially become an expensive toy. RIP Mac Pro. No real Pro would want it now.
That would make more sense. I’ll have to listen to it again. 👍🏻You misheard, or someone misstated. The 13” Air is by far Apple’s best selling laptop.
The ability to make defect-free display panels reduces as size increases.The "6 Pro XDR Displays" thing really cracks me up. Display technology is so far behind everything else. I mean really....six?! Can't you just make one display that's big enough?
Nor does it connect to a desktop Mac to act as a virtual display.Vision Pro if it ran Mac apps, which it doesn't.
I have the same suspicion.honestly I think the silicon folks and the Mac product teams werent on the same page. I think this machine is a compromise, they didn't have to build out a new form of the M* series chips that broke out more things from the SoC/chiplet/bus designs just for the least sold machine and the product folks still got a Mac Pro with expansion slots to sell to the industries they want to keep that really need it (designers, film production, etc). This is probably neither the Mac Pro the product teams wanted nor the chip lineup the silicon teams wanted.
How? Via compressed video through Airplay?But you can use it as a display for your Mac, and make said display as large as you want.
More like the focus on everything mobile …Are you kidding? You really don't know anything about software and hardware development.
Yeah I noticed that immediately. Plus, that limited RAM is shared between GPU and CPU.The Mac Pro with an M2 Ultra is a really weird device to me. The 192GB RAM limit is much lower than the 1.5TB of the previous machine. And can you actually pop an Nvidia or AMD card into this thing? If not then what's the point? Just get the Mac Studio for $3000 less at every spec level and have a lot smaller footprint.