Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why would someone pay $500-1000 / hour to sleep with her? :rolleyes:

Have you ever seen what a regular prostitute looks like? Compared to them she looks like a supermodel. She's comparable to what you'd find at infamous places like the Bunny Ranch.

What you see on TV or movies is nowhere close to real life. Ones that are that hot are even more expensive or work in safer and more sanitary settings such as pornography.

Apparently I'm the only male who thinks that a woman's face and personality are more important than her boobs... doesn't having a connection with someone make it more satisfying than "Face? Smile? Sense of humor? Love? Nah, brah it's bewbs. OMG I love Bewbs."

Personality isn't what men are looking for in a prostitute.
 
Last edited:
Have you ever seen what a regular prostitute looks like? Compared to them she looks like a supermodel. She's comparable to what you'd find at infamous places like the Bunny Ranch.

What you see on TV or movies is nowhere close to real life. Ones that are that hot are even more expensive or work in safer and more sanitary settings such as pornography.

You aren't going to the right places. :p
 
Apparently I'm the only male who thinks that a woman's face and personality are more important than her boobs... doesn't having a connection with someone make it more satisfying than "Face? Smile? Sense of humor? Love? Nah, brah it's bewbs. OMG I love Bewbs."

They're made of fat; they sag. It's like being attracted to Jabba the Hutt.
 
They're made of fat; they sag. It's like being attracted to Jabba the Hutt.

...and yet in the correct context - or for this discussion I should say: on the right context - they are things of beauty. Who knew fat could be attractive after all, eh?

...

Personality isn't what men are looking for in a prostitute.
This is very, very true. And, not to sound classist, elitist, or caste-supportive, this is what separates men from animals. Or more specifically, an amoral man from a moral one. The only standard is sex; no discernment, no quality, no feeling.
 
Last edited:
Holy ****. Some of the responses here are...shocking.

2014, they said, the year of social progress and equality:rolleyes:

Please explain how sleeping with 10,000 people constitutes social progress ?

Also, please explain how this pertains to EQUALITY ?

If this had been a guy, similar comments (from a different audience) would have been made.

-t
 
Please explain how sleeping with 10,000 people constitutes social progress ?

Also, please explain how this pertains to EQUALITY ?

If this had been a guy, similar comments (from a different audience) would have been made.

-t
Point being, that is exactly what WOULDN'T have happened. He would have been called a player and the rest of the people would have laughed it off. That and it wouldn't even be news...
 
I just happened to be passing through.

And my opinion on this ... is ... whatever.

Off my game I guess.

To be honest, I, too would probably have given this thread a miss were it not for the tone used by some posters when posting.

That is because the tone used here by some posters is one that goes well beyond a subliminal (and unquestioning) acceptance of the notorious double-standard whereby men are viewed as 'players' whereas women are seen in wholly negative terms. No, the tone makes it clear that what some posters feel when describing (what they may fear is rampant and uncontrolled) female sexuality is nothing other than visceral disgust.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.