Never claimed apple released the video. Still doesn't change the fact that this device has been rumored for years and has plenty of "charging pads" that can charge multiple devices. Maybe apple will finally get theirs right and not cause it to overheat and catch fire.Nothing does quite the same thing and this video wasn’t released by Apple.
On the one hand, even the watch with the clasp doesn't sit flush with the charger so your point about the watch doesn't require a different band.I wasn’t talking about precise device placement. More that if you have a watch band that doesn’t open to allow the watch to sit flush, like, say, Loop, then Apple’s design was pretty useless. Said another way, I’m not unclasping my Loop every time I need to charge my watch. Considering that’s a daily requirement, that’s a 100% deal breaker for me.
Anyway, a quick search yields dozens of vendors that make wireless pads that charge phones, watches, and AirPods. Some offer similar builds to the all-flat design of AirPower. Some address the shortcomings of the all-flat design.
Too late for Apple. They missed the boat (wireless hover craft thingy…oh dear lame pun)
as the industry is saturated with wireless solutions.
I have the Nomad Base Station Pro. It sucks.I never fully bought the 3-coil overheating challenges that were tossed about as reasons why the device never launched (tho I’m certain those were a challenge) - especially considering several other brands cracked that nut. The issue that always stuck out to me was a basic design flaw: an uncharacteristic lack of consideration for watch bands that prevented a watch to rest flat. It mat be possible they couldn’t land on a functional design that also scratched their clean aesthetic itch.
Anyway, I agree: that ship has sailed. Plenty of other vendors making this product - which yes, I know, has never stopped Apple. If anything, I could see them adding a third panel to their current MagSafe Duo (trio?), and call it good.
Does it stay on the table when you take items off it it or something?Nothing does quite the same thing and this video wasn’t released by Apple.
What was novel about AirPower is that you could place things anywhere. Anybody can just glue three Qi chargers together and call it a day.I wasn’t talking about precise device placement.
Anyway, a quick search yields dozens of vendors that make wireless pads that charge phones, watches, and AirPods. Some offer similar builds to the all-flat design of AirPower. Some address the shortcomings of the all-flat design.
I think the idea was that it had different size coils or they were close enough together that the Apple Watch would work.I’ve always wondered how this was meant to work with Apple Watch since the only charger that works is the included puck.
Maybe this was an issue as not even the new MagSafe chargers are compatible with apple watch, maybe the redesign will solve any issues
Too little, too late apple. Plenty of other options out there that do the same thing.
You could, I assume, place your Apple charger in thisI wasn’t talking about precise device placement. More that if you have a watch band that doesn’t open to allow the watch to sit flush, like, say, Loop, then Apple’s design was pretty useless. Said another way, I’m not unclasping my Loop every time I need to charge my watch. Considering that’s a daily requirement, that’s a 100% deal breaker for me.
Anyway, a quick search yields dozens of vendors that make wireless pads that charge phones, watches, and AirPods. Some offer similar builds to the all-flat design of AirPower. Some address the shortcomings of the all-flat design.
Why would you need magnets guiding the connection if the devices can be placed anywhere? There would be no specific place to guide them to.The apparent win of AirPower is being able to place devices anywhere on the mat. But something that becomes apparent once you use these wireless chargers for a while is that you REALLY want a magnet guiding the connection.
The point is that it's solving a problem that no longer exists.Why would you need magnets guiding the connection if the devices can be placed anywhere? There would be no specific place to guide them to.
Not quite, no wireless charger can charge the Apple WatchToo little, too late apple. Plenty of other options out there that do the same thing.
A simple Google search shows you are wrong. Plenty of options out there that charge multiple devices as once. I mean literally one of the first ones that came up when I did a Google search Satechi chargerNot quite, no wireless charger can charge the Apple Watch
I really think this was a marketing fail rather than an engineering flub. I'm sure Apple hits dead ends in product development all the time - this one they simply announced FAR too prematurely.Not so much missing the boat. But choosing to not enter the market with another commodity item. Like laser printers, low-cost displays, wifi routers, etc.
Not so much missing the boat. But choosing to not enter the market with another commodity item. Like laser printers, low-cost displays, wifi routers, etc.
Err no, a quick google search would tell you that’s just an Apple Watch puck. That’s Not charging via QI charging which is what air power was to do. No other device can do that. Air power was place it anywhere and it charges which included the Apple Watch.A simple Google search shows you are wrong. Plenty of options out there that charge multiple devices as once. I mean literally one of the first ones that came up when I did a Google search Satechi charger