If I want corrections in my grammar, I think I can do better than someone with "32 Giggity Giggity Gigg-i-ty" in their signature
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Would having retina display on the iPad 3 be worth the upgrade alone?
- Thread starter rovex
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
If I want corrections in my grammar, I think I can do better than someone with "32 Giggity Giggity Gigg-i-ty" in their signature
You haven't got any legs to stand on when addressing other people's failures. Time and again, you've accentuated what an intellectually inept individual you are. Latest example below.
This was never in doubt, we are speaking to somebody who hasn't got a clue.
Last edited:
If I want corrections in my grammar, I think I can do better than someone with "32 Giggity Giggity Gigg-i-ty" in their signature
corrections to my grammar
Good times.
Last edited:
corrections to my grammar
Good times.
You wouldn't of thought that after attacking someone's grammar he would then make an error himself after being reminded of the one spotted in his sig!
So you can't defend yourself when it comes to discussing this initial thread topic so you turn your attention to my signature which you still depend on someone else to (wrongly) pick flaws in.
Firstly, it's plainly obvious to anybody with a modicum of intelligence my signature addresses the fact that people often use the term "Could care less" when actually they mean "Couldn't care less". Because the exact wording of my signature is "Couldn't care less", not "Could care less" there is no error since it is merely pointing out that the two things are not the same. Capitalization is erroneous since a sentence could very well begin with either of these expressions as a response to a statement of fact or intention. I find it depressing that I must point out such basic nuance of the English language but there you go...Depressing but not surprising.
Secondly, the zeal with which you eagerly brown nose a fellow contributor on this thread tells us much about your character. For example, when faced with someone who actually calls you out on your statements of fact you attempt to weasel your way out of it and quickly seek refuge behind the comments of another poster in order to detract from your own (vast) inadequacies.
You are my little friend, truly laughable and transparent as to make crystal seem opaque by comparison. On the bright side, you are I trust, bio degradable. Until that happy day comes, try not to steal too much oxygen there's a good chap.
You wouldn't of thought that after attacking someone's grammar he would then make an error himself after being reminded of the one spotted in his sig!
Yum yum, don't you just love that brown stuff!
corrections to my grammar
Good times.
Well spotted....Enjoy those little victories, they are few and far between.
32 Giggity Giggity Gigg-i-ty - Is that even English?
So you can't defend yourself when it comes to discussing this initial thread topic so you turn your attention to my signature which you still depend on someone else to (wrongly) pick flaws in.
Firstly, it's plainly obvious to anybody with a modicum of intelligence my signature addresses the fact that people often use the term "Could care less" when actually they mean "Couldn't care less". Because the exact wording of my signature is "Couldn't care less", not "Could care less" there is no error since it is merely pointing out that the two things are not the same. Capitalization is erroneous since a sentence could very well begin with either of these expressions as a response to a statement of fact or intention. I find it depressing that I must point out such basic nuance of the English language but there you go...Depressing but not surprising.
Secondly, the zeal with which you eagerly brown nose a fellow contributor on this thread tells us much about your character. For example, when faced with someone who actually calls you out on your statements of fact you attempt to weasel your way out of it and quickly seek refuge behind the comments of another poster in order to detract from your own (vast) inadequacies.
You are my little friend, truly laughable and transparent as to make crystal seem opaque by comparison. On the bright side, you are I trust, bio degradable. Until that happy day comes, try not to steal too much oxygen there's a good chap.
The sense of desperation is clear here. I no longer see reason to reply to you extensively after showcasing to us what an imbecile of a person we are actually communicating with.
With that being said, I hope you contract an unpleasant disease sometime soon.
The sense of desperation is clear here. I no longer see reason to reply to you extensively after showcasing to us what an imbecile of a person we are actually communicating with.
With that being said, I hope you contract an unpleasant disease sometime soon.
I accept your full, unconditional surrender!
I accept your full, unconditional surrender!
Think again, I want your spanking prolonged!
You were saying about my grammar?
corrections to my grammar
Good times.
Don't throw stones in glass houses!
Last edited:
OK, ok. I had a really good but pretty unkind response to this all lined up but I'm going to keep it under wraps.
Rovex, I'm not going to argue with you anymore since this has become way too personal and I'm not proud of my part in it. I'm going to try and be the bigger man here and walk away since we're clearly not going to see eye to eye. I hope the iPad 3 comes with a retina screen and that you're really happy with it....Personally I'd prefer a file system and user profiles of some description but there you go.
I hope you live a long, happy, healthy fulfilling life and I'm sorry for the bio degradable remarks....That was beyond the pale and said in the heat of the moment.
It is a play on the character Quagmire from the tv show Family Guy. It's not meant to be taken literally.
Last edited:
i'll admit i didn't read most of the last page or two of fighting, but i do think buried beneath the internet argumentativeness is an interesting topic, which this article discusses:
http://theelaborated.net/blog/2011/4/13/consider-the-retina-display.html#fnr9-2011-04-13
for what it's worth, i'm definitely waiting at least until ipad 3 for a retina display. i've been totally spoiled by the iphone 4's display, and when i read text on the ipad 2 (which will be a primary function for my ipad when i buy one), it looks weirdly grainy to me. i'm not saying it's a bad display; i just REALLY like the ppi of the iphone 4.
if ipad 3 doesn't have that pixel density, or if ipad 3 doesn't come in the next year, i'll look at used ipad 2s and compare them to the benefits of whatever ipad 3 adds, and get my first ipad then, as at that point i'll want/need one for my career.
http://theelaborated.net/blog/2011/4/13/consider-the-retina-display.html#fnr9-2011-04-13
for what it's worth, i'm definitely waiting at least until ipad 3 for a retina display. i've been totally spoiled by the iphone 4's display, and when i read text on the ipad 2 (which will be a primary function for my ipad when i buy one), it looks weirdly grainy to me. i'm not saying it's a bad display; i just REALLY like the ppi of the iphone 4.
if ipad 3 doesn't have that pixel density, or if ipad 3 doesn't come in the next year, i'll look at used ipad 2s and compare them to the benefits of whatever ipad 3 adds, and get my first ipad then, as at that point i'll want/need one for my career.