Would Steve Jobs Have Allowed A Protruding Camera?

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by Kurso, Sep 9, 2014.

  1. Kurso macrumors 6502

    Sep 10, 2013
    I was really excited about the iPhone 6 announcement until they actually showed the phone. I'm happy with the iPhone 5s but I love gadgets so I would have picked up the iPhone 6 just because its the newer model. In fact I'm in the minority that thinks the iPhone 5s is the perfect size for a phone. Knowing the iPhone 6 was going to be bigger was not a selling point to me but I mentally accepted it before today.

    I have never placed a case on any of my previous iPhones because I like the slim uniform feel and the beauty of the product. With the protruding camera a case become all but required to provide surface uniformity. I can't imagine that a protruding camera would have been acceptable to Steve Jobs and it's disappointing that Tim Cook and team have allowed this in the iPhone 6 design.

    If the iPhone 5s can support Apple Pay via the Apple Watch I think I'll skip the iPhone 6 because of the camera.
  2. jk4lebron23 macrumors 65816


    Apr 6, 2010
    If he wanted a phone this thin i think he would have allowed it.
    it doesn't bother me at all because it keeps the back slightly raised when you set it down going naked :D
  3. sr1329 macrumors member

    Apr 1, 2009
    I don't know about that a 0.2mm protrusion on a tiny part of the device will not even be perceptible in a pocket.
  4. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god


    Oct 20, 2011
    Austin, TX
    It doesn't matter what Steve Jobs thinks, thought, or would have thought. Sadly, he passed away in 2011.
  5. macs4nw macrumors 601


    Steve was an ultra-perfectionist, while Tim appears to be a few shades more pragmatic. The three devices introduced today are imho all visually striking, and at this point I'm not going to lose any sleep over what Steve might or might not have done. Let the man rest in peace.
  6. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6


    Aug 17, 2007
    Agreed, people need to stop this nonsense. Steve is dead, time to move on people.
  7. Technarchy macrumors 604


    May 21, 2012
    Steve is no longer with us, so we will never know what he would have "allowed"
  8. Sonisk macrumors member

    Apr 17, 2011
    I've been thinking all along too, that Steve probably never would let that happen. You indeed need a cover to make it flush, why the even make it that much thinner, when the end user has to add bulk anyways? Come on Apple, you can do much much better than that imo.
  9. nnacrumors macrumors 6502

    Jun 12, 2014
    I really wish Steve could come back and kick everyone in the nuts who asks a "would steve have allowed this?" type question :D
  10. StuddedLeather macrumors 6502a

    Apr 20, 2009
    Brooklyn, NYC
    : Deep sigh :

    I admired Steve and his vision as well as everything he's done for Apple. I even call him one of my biggest inspirations and motivators still to this day. With that being said we HAVE to stop thinking/questioning "Well what would Steve do", It's irrelevant.

    Like Tim said Steve's DNA will always be the foundation of Apple & I truly believe that. His legacy will go on for many decades and hopefully centuries untarnished. But asking "Would he approve" in every single thread (not just you) is pointless and won't bring him back to us.

    You won't like every product. You won't like every design. It's fine. We all have a choice. But sadly we can never bring Steve back. . .

    And I truly hate saying that.
  11. cynics macrumors G4

    Jan 8, 2012
    Would Steve Jobs Have Allowed A Protruding Camera?

    Why wasn't a protruding camera a problem for the iPod touch a device rarely kept in a case?

    I do think it's funny Apples measurements weren't from the widest part (camera) when measuring thinness though. How many times have you measured how thick something is by measuring the thinnest part?
  12. lordofthereef macrumors G5


    Nov 29, 2011
    Boston, MA
    I personally think he would have had bigger issue with the enormous screen(s) than the protruding camera.
  13. moldy lunchbox macrumors 6502a

    moldy lunchbox

    Sep 9, 2010
    Raleigh, NC
    Can MacRumors make a rule of no "Would Steve Jobs allowed this" threads? Maybe like a warning or two then ban. These threads are really annoying.
  14. ltb7 macrumors 6502


    Nov 5, 2010
    the beach
    it makes me sad to see all the posts about what would steve jobs do, just shows what an amazing + great impact he has had on so many people! he knew his time was ending and i am sure that he passed on his wealth of knowledge to the best of his ability, he was an iconic genius and will be in history books - as grumpy as he was he loved apple! good and bad things in life happen for reasons, a lot of times we just don't know why - we will never know what he would have done with apple, nor were we meant to know - celebrate his legacy.....
  15. terraphantm macrumors 68040

    Jun 27, 2009
    My gut feeling is that this is one thing Steve really wouldn't have allowed. He'd have either made the whole phone slightly thicker or put on a crappier lens (sadly, I think the latter would have been the result since Steve seemed pretty obsessed with unnecessary thinness)

    I also suspect we'd be stuck with 3.5" phones if Steve were still around.
  16. blueflower macrumors 6502

    Sep 26, 2006
    I doubt he would have and similarly I doubt he would have approved these designs.
  17. maflynn Moderator


    Staff Member

    May 3, 2009
    We really can't answer that, but I'd conjecture that he wouldn't. I think there comes a point where thin is too thin, and that boundary was reached on the iPhone 5 and broached with the 6. Clearly with protruding camera it alters the clean lines.
  18. phillytim macrumors 65816


    Aug 12, 2011
    Philadelphia, PA
    Being such a thin phone, a TWiT commentator yesterday was saying that it's not unexpected to have a little protrusion because of the new optical stabilization element of the camera.

    So I'm going with that.

    However it's to the point where I'd rather have the form factor thickness of my iPhone 5S remain to have the afforded elongated battery life that a phone the size of iPhone 6/Plus + its more efficient processor energy use. Perhaps having iPhone 5S thickness would have alleviated the need for protrusion, however.

    I'm not an engineer so I could only hypothesize that point.
  19. Olivia23 macrumors 6502a


    Jul 26, 2008
    Like others have said when phones get so thin that's what happens. Of course they probably could have kept it flush with the back and sacrificed camera performance.
  20. FrozenInferno macrumors regular

    Oct 27, 2013
    I don't think Steve would have settled for a protruding camera.

    Apple's obsession with thin-ness is getting so bad they can barely get the parts to fit anymore.

    Time to start accepting the current thin profile and using the space gained to improve battery life and put better parts (like these high quality cameras) in without things sticking out of the shell.
  21. Macalway macrumors 68020

    Aug 7, 2013
    Don't most people use cases?

    I use them now for the trade-in, which seems to be often :D
  22. dgreene196 macrumors member

    Jun 10, 2011
    It's a common practice in other commercial electronics, particularly cameras. The dimensions given don't include protrusions (like the viewfinder or, in rare cases, the handgrip). This may have improved in the past couple of years, but Sony was particularly bad about this with their early mirrorless cameras not too long ago. Compared to that practice, discounting 0.2 mm that cover a very small portion of the total surface area of the body.
  23. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6


    Aug 17, 2007
    Amen, brother!

  24. barkomatic macrumors 68040

    Aug 8, 2008
    Not only would he have not allowed it, he would have had a meltdown at even the suggestion of a protruding camera. He would then go on to insult that person's mother followed by termination. :D
  25. sixxmum macrumors 6502a


    Aug 15, 2010
    We didn't "know" Steve Jobs of 2014. He was a real person, not an icon. His views would have evolved in ways we can't anticipate over another 3 years. It's time to let the people running the show now do it without living up to speculation over what someone the public only knew from his public face would have "thought" or "allowed."

Share This Page