$699 is more realistic and yes, it will have bigger display than 12" hopefullyIf it is not smaller than 12'' and less than 1 kg, I'll buy it even if it is much more than $599.
$699 is more realistic and yes, it will have bigger display than 12" hopefullyIf it is not smaller than 12'' and less than 1 kg, I'll buy it even if it is much more than $599.
I think a lot of people are going to be disappointed if they're expecting a $599 MSRP. However, even if somewhat more expensive, I'd strongly consider it for my kids for high school. One kid is currently using a 2015 13" Core i5 MacBook Pro, and the other kid using my old 2017 27" Core i5 iMac.
For myself though, I will continue to use my M4 iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard as my "laptop", with my old 2017 m3 12" MacBook as a backup for the few times I absolutely must use macOS.
View attachment 2570302
![]()
Apple dock could turn your iPhone into a MacBook
Apple has created a dock that could turn a future iPhone or iPad into a MacBook. The idea is explained in a patent application published on Thursday,www.cultofmac.com
In all seriousness, M1 MacBook Airs can seemingly be had for $500-600 nowadays, and they're still very capable machines for the majority of the needs of non-power users. If Apple truly wants to release a budget-level "good enough" MacBook, they could just re-release the original M1 MacBook Air with 8 GB RAM/256 GB storage using the case design of the current model.
Apple doesn't really even acknowledge the existence of the M1 MacBook Air as a retail product. It's nowhere to be found on the Apple online store.Isn't it clear by now Apple doesn't want to do that?
A18/A19 is cheaper to produce and outperforms M1. It also fixes hardware vulnerabilities because it's newer. Why would Apple stick with M1 MBA for $599 when it's cheaper and the user experience is better with A18/A19?
No. I use an iPad Pro as my main laptop but I will freely admit it is missing many features that a true MacBook has, mainly because of iPadOS, and the software written for it.I’m not understanding the purpose of releasing such a product. Wouldn’t this be similar (enough) to an iPad + Magic Keyboard Folio?
The next revsiion/generation iPad is likely to feature the A18.
The combined expense, assuming the base config iPad, is $598.
The iPad is definitely capable of word processing, presentations (i.e., Keynote), spreadsheets, Web browsing, Web apps, media consumption, collaboration (e.g., email, other messaging, video chats), and more.
Plus, there are the touchscreen and even more mobile (i.e., cellular connection) options.
Basically, in practicality, the concept is already achievable.
Okay. But what is iPadOS missing that wouldn’t allow performing the tasks I mentioned? By the way, the tasks span anything from majority of general users, students, and even business/office personnel (e.g., accountants). And this includes utilizing thumb/flash drives as well as the ability to print (for those who still have that step).No. I use an iPad Pro as my main laptop but I will freely admit it is missing many features that a true MacBook has, mainly because of iPadOS.
I edited my post before you posted yours. See above.Okay. But what is iPadOS missing that wouldn’t allow performing the tasks I mentioned? By the way, the tasks span anything from majority of general users, students, and even business/office personnel (e.g., accountants). And this includes utilizing thumb/flash drives as well as the ability to print (for those who still have that step).
I edited the post before you posted yours. See above.
The iPad does many things in theory, but for a lot of them it really is kinda half-assed. iPadOS simply isn't mature yet as a general productivity OS. However, many people don't need it to be a general productivity OS which is why it works for some people.
I’m genuinely curious. Was it a software issue/limitation (e.g., bug or incompatibility) or performance (e.g., stutters)?For example, I failed miserably trying to give a presentation through Zoom on the iPad. Works fine on my old and slow 2017 12" MacBook.
Software + OS limitation for presenter mode use. And even for regular single-screen presentation mode use, it's buggy.I’m genuinely curious. Was it a software issue/limitation (e.g., bug or incompatibility) or performance (e.g., stutters)?
I’m not understanding the purpose of releasing such a product. Wouldn’t this be similar (enough) to an iPad + Magic Keyboard Folio?
The next revsiion/generation iPad is likely to feature the A18.
The combined expense, assuming the base config iPad, is $598.
The iPad is definitely capable of word processing, presentations (i.e., Keynote), spreadsheets, Web browsing, Web apps, media consumption, collaboration (e.g., email, other messaging, video chats), and more.
Plus, there are the touchscreen and even more mobile (i.e., cellular connection) options.
Basically, in practicality, the concept is already achievable.
I don’t find this to be a real world issue for my usage style of MacBook vs iPad+Magic Keyboard.Even if the software were perfect, the challenge is physical design.
Try to balance an iPad with a keyboard on a lap or uneven surface. The viewing angles are limited by the case. It's also precarious because the product is top heavy. A notebook puts all the guts in the base of the chassis. This is why an iPad will never replace a MacBook.
I don’t find this to be a real world issue for my usage style of MacBook vs iPad+Magic Keyboard.
I have a Magic Keyboard, but I almost never use either my MacBook or my iPad with keyboard on my lap.Are you using the Magic Keyboard or Magic Keyboard Folio? The Folio has a kickstand which requires a big flat surface.
It's not that easy to install Linux on a MacBook, especially on one with a T2 chip.Yes, if I could wipe MacOS and run Linux on it.
There are certain internal components missing in MacBooks that are present in ThinkPads, which allows any version Linux to be installed.Would take a cheap macbook over the refurbished Thinkpads I normally use for this purpose.
All Apple needs to do is accept lower profits and consider consumers in a better light, rather than releasing products like the iPhone Air at higher prices and ultimately losing out as a result.Considering you can get a new MacBook M4 air 13" base model for $749 I don't see a need for a $599 model. They would have to make a lot of compromises that no one would like.