No, iTunes doesn't have ads – I said "iTunes is a vessel used to advertise for the Store". This is the very reason I am back at iTunes 7.7.1 and not 8.x.x.
iTunes interface itself have become bloated, slow and Store-centric. I really don't like it for those reasons anymore. But again, I assume your "come back" will be something along the line of "Most people like it".
Slow, what are you running, a G3 Powerbook? Give me a break, I've used the newest version of iTunes with music and video libraries well over 80gb and it was just as fast as any other program on the market.
I don't care that the reason iDVD and garage band are that large is because of many loops. As I said: "The libraries" are huge, and since I have no use for such an app (I use proper audio apps, thank you), I consider them nothing but bloat.
Thats great, I'm glad you use proper audio apps, but stating that a program, which is fully functional and quite productive, is bloat, is nonsense.
I'd really like to know a) howcome you consider antivirus to be bloat, and b) what gave you the idea that I talked on behalf of "the majority"?
Spoken like someone that has never run Norton. You think iMovie is bloat? Does iMovie slow your computer down? Does it take minutes for your internet browser to open with iLife installed? No? Well try running Norton on a moderate PC, then you'll know what bloat is.
Ah, yes – yet another plea to popularity. How about the user simply was given a choice when he/she opens the computer the first time? You know, the very lack of choice you guys bitched about. But as usual, double standards: It sucks when it's windows, but excellent when the same thing happens on a Mac.
I'd be fine with a box being there, in fact it would be an excellent addition but who cares when the programs are easy to get rid of and don't affect the performance of your computer? Thats the difference. It seems like you've never opened a Sony Viao thats supposed to run at about the same speed as the Macbook and had it take minutes to boot and lag like mad when trying to open the simple applications. Thats bloat, those programs, the ones that Sony, Compaq, et al, put on that have extremely little function and slow your machine down extremely. Thats bloat. iLife doesn't slow your machine down, doesn't automatically open at startup (doesn't increase your boot time), and can actually be used to accomplish a task or provide entertainment; thats a pretty big difference from most of the crap pre-installed on a PC.
I have no problem with Windows, I run it via bootcamp, the problem, as has been mentioned before, is with the manufacturers. Windows itself, if I recall correctly, came with only one or two trials at the time of purchase, similar to newer OS X machines, with the iWork and Office trials.
What's the difference between this situation where you are all apologetic and the bitching done by the OP about having to remove a simple plugin? See above for the reason.
Yeah, all he complained about was removing some plugin, not that the IE automatically forced him to install it when he logged into the browser. Ever seen Safari force you to install something on startup? Doesn't happen. And he didn't mention a thing about that POS Norton being installed on his computer, nope, just apologetic bitching about uninstalling a plugin.
There is a huge difference, is iLife negatively affecting the performance of your computer when you open the box? No. Is Norton negatively affecting the performance of your computer when you open the box? Almost guaranteed. Is Safari forcing you to install plugins at startup? No. But for the OP, IE clearly did. You should never be forced to install anything on a machine, especially utter crap like the Windows Live Toolbar.
I would hardly care what was prepackaged with my PC if it didn't affect the machines performance. When I bought one of my Compaq's, oh, 6 or so years ago, the only thing pre-installed was MSN Messenger and MSN Browser or something of the sort, guess what, I didn't have anything to complain about because my computer still booted properly and wasn't slowed down by the programs. Same thing with iLife, my computer isn't slow to boot or run because of those programs, so I don't complain. The Vaios and HPs I've bought recently, however, are a far different story. Slow to boot out of the box is ridiculous.
, you must be doing something wrong.
Yeah, having had PCs and Apples in my since I was old enough to sit in a chair and see them, I have no clue how to properly uninstall programs on either one.
Nothing like painting a pretty picture is there?
I only paint it how I see it and the way Apple packages and ships the software on their machines is very pretty in comparison to the majority of PC makers.
I think we have quite different definitions of bloat. Bloat to you is anything that takes up HD space and you don't regularly use or like, thats more of an Apple definition of bloat. Bloat to me is something that slows your machine down and makes it run poorly, thats bloat on the PC side. Whatever, to each their own, there are certain things I dislike about iLife, having used "proper" music and photo programs, but iLife is perfectly fine for my every day needs and many of the problems have easy workarounds, so I'll deal with my 3GB Garageband and iDVD library and continue using the programs.