Not used them yet myself, just read lots of reviews.
http://gizmodo.com/5918176/google-maps-vs-apple-maps-a-side-by-side-comparison
"devoid of useful information" - I've seen hundreds of comments like this in reviews of Apple Maps.
Not that I care, I won't use them on my iPad and I have an Android phone.
The roads are there yeah, they're just missing names!!
I've been unhappy with Google's map app on iOS and for the last two years have been using MapQuest for free turn-by-turn. It's my go to map app. I only use the built in Apple/Google on for mass transit, which still isn't always accurate.
Are you sure this was all Apple's decision, give the patent lawsuits between the two companies? The drop came shortly after the verdict. Google may have declined to renew the contract, asked for an outrageous amount, or demanded cross licensing of patents to continue the contract.
I have no way of knowing, but it is suspicious.
Apple's map will be great, will improve or will be a bomb. If it's not good enough, I'll still be using MapQuest in the US and maps.google.com for mass transit, which really doesn't need constant updating anyway.
Why not also assume that apple didnt want to renew google maps contract ? Or do you think that they just said "fck it lets just make our own maps and stick it to google" ?
It's just interesting that Youtube was there until late betas which also seemed to coincide with the lawsuit.
It could have been either side, I'm just guessing the lawsuit soured relations more than people think.
It's just interesting that Youtube was there until late betas which also seemed to coincide with the lawsuit.
It could have been either side, I'm just guessing the lawsuit soured relations more than people think.
I've never used Android myself, but read lots of Android reviews on MacRumors.
"Laggy and unstable"- I've seen hundreds of comments like this in reviews of Android.
Hard to rate something that you've never used...just saying.
(Note: I am not knocking Android, just making a point about judgements made from others opinions)
It took google 3 years to perfect google maps, this is apples first few months. Give it time, and if you want a far comparison, then go look for the google maps beta and compare it with the first release of apple maps
im going to get really p1ssed if people keep giving apple the benefit of the doubt if they say "beta"
it's not beta when they release the program to the public!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----------
then apple should of waited 3 years before releasing their own map program.
it's clearly spiteful.
f u apple.
You are clearly missing the point. Why would Apple wait, Apple Maps is excellent, even in its early stages. Apple believed it could do a better job at Maps than Google (Spiteful or otherwise)... I definitely believe they can
You are clearly missing the point. Why would Apple wait, Apple Maps is excellent, even in its early stages. Apple believed it could do a better job at Maps than Google (Spiteful or otherwise)... I definitely believe they can
It took google 3 years to perfect google maps, this is apples first few months. Give it time, and if you want a far comparison, then go look for the google maps beta and compare it with the first release of apple maps
Do you have a source for this?
I'm going to say right off the bat, that I'm not a fan of Apple Maps in its current form.
The primary objective of any map should be functionality to help you understand an area & get you to a destination as easily as possible. In the case of a map, that means detailed information.
It doesn't mean minimalistic, pretty, "less cluttered" etc etc
It is a fact that, at this stage, we have lost a lot of the functionality of mapping from our devices until Google releases a stand-alone app.
Anyway, I have a slightly different point I'd like to address. I'd read previously that the 3-D vector graphics were supposed to be less processor intensive when compared to Google's street view, however, I'm finding that if I browse on 3-D for a period of time, say 10 minutes, it trashes my battery & the phone gets fairly hot.
Anyone having the same experience? I'm on a 4S, by the way and it seems obvious to me that street view is much quicker to navigate & the 3-D vector graphics on Apple Maps take longer to draw - In other words, it even looks more processor intensive visually.
On another note, I'm happy we now have free turn by turn capability, however, when I tried it for the first time recently it was lagging to the extent where, if I did not know the route, I would miss a turn. Might be a problem with my phone, rather than software, but I'll be keeping an eye on it.
Totally agree. I used the Maps App for the first time this week. I was hoping the critics were wrong but it's a total downgrade from Google Maps.
Much more laggy, not as accurate, 3D looked terrible in my opinion. Turn by turn is no substitute for what's already out there. Such as disappointment.
Confident it'll get better but knowing Apple it will take a long time.
I hate to say this but i'm hoping for that Google Maps/Navigation App for iPhone asap.
Google maps = 10 year plus development.
Give Apple a chance FFS.
Turn by Turn is absolutely brilliant and i'm coming from the TomTom app which I haven't used since installing the first beta.
The problem with Apple Maps is not that it's not 'as good as Google maps' - its that in its current state it isn't reliable.
The lack of satellite images is really poor, but you can use maps without it.
However, the vector maps are where the big problem is. They have so many errors. Now this may depend on where you live, but in the UK they have towns placed many miles away from where they should be, they have huge data issues.
The average person will type a town name into their iOS 6 device and start driving there - they will end up many miles off course.
Everyone needs to stop apologising for Apple, and saying 'oh but its new'. If it wasn't ready, then it should not have been released. They are the biggest company in the world, they have the resources.
If a new mobile OS came out that didn't let you call people, or called the wrong person, would that be ok 'because its new'? no.