Not sure what all the fuss is about...I use both FireFox and Safari almost interchangeably, and have found both to be fast and stable. I'm running the latest versions of both under Tiger on a PowerBook G4 and a PowerMac G4. No issues with either application on either machine.
I think it all comes down to which interface you prefer.

Man, I've tried to like this web browser over the past 3 weeks, really. But the app just blows when it comes to functioning as a web browser compaired to FireFox.
Crashes, load times, funcionallity, no extensions, visuals, options available, etc.
I really wanted to like Safari and keep it around, but why would anyone choose to use this over Fire Fox is beyond me.
![]()
i'm curious, why would anyone use more than one browser (in this case, Safari and FF)? i don't see the logic in it.
if you say you use Safari, then switch to FF if a page won't load in Safari....then why not just use FF 100% of the time knowing it will load any page?
if you say you use FF, then switch to Safari because you like the look (as an example), why not just use FF 100% of the time and d/load the Safari Theme for FF?
not trying to be critical of others, i just don't see the logic in using more than one browser. bottom line is, FF is just as fast as all the other browsers and even faster in some instances. plus with FF, you can customize the Theme and add Extensions. plus it'll display any web page, unlike Safari.
makes little sense really.
![]()
i'm curious, why would anyone use more than one browser (in this case, Safari and FF)? i don't see the logic in it.
Web Developers may wish to use more than one browser and many people might just like a change from time to time. And whilst you can get FF to look like Safari, it still won't support services like the Address Book and system wide spell and grammar checking. FF has a spell-checker, you say. True, but if I add a word to the dictionary in Mail I don't particularly want to have to add it again to my FF dictionary.
All browsers have their strengths and weaknesses. Some people on this thread aren't open minded enough. You say FF loads everything, which is not accurate because it won't handle ActiveX controls on the Mac.
Safari does the job Apple wants off it and does it well. Apple couldn't have chosen the Gecko engine (used by Firefox, Flock and Camino) because it is not great on mobile devices. Their choice of WebKit (KHTML) has worked, because it allows them use an advanced browser in the Touch and iPhone. Google has also gone with web kit for Android. The other choice would have been Opera mobile.
Also Safari supports some stuff which no other browser supports (as far as I know) from the CSS 3 spec AND is constantly delivering good standards support (it passed the ACID 2 test before FF, for example).

I tried to like Safari when I upgraded to Leopard, but it still blows.
I am a heavy tab window user. I usually have 6 or 7 tabs up. Safari constantly beach balls where I have to force quit. It even happens when I try to quit Safari or shut down. I send the report to Apple daily. Another annoying thing with Safari is that it opens links from the web it a new window but not tabs.
I was a Firefox guy on my Powerbook with Tiger. but I recently discovered Camino and I'm liking it so far.
Safari has NEVER crashed on my Al 24" iMac.
. . . . and it is fast.
I hear you. That is really the only issue I have with Camino. I still forget to check URLs and click on .pdf files and then the download starts. I am so desperate that I am considering attempting to write a plug-in for Camino. Given how little coding I have done in recent years it could be real painful. But a good sign of my desperation. 😀